Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Maybe people already said this above, but Mojave is stable and great. I have a 2017 MBP, which isn’t terribly new, and I LOVE the combination.

I can’t think of any good reason to “upgrade” to Catalina, let alone anything that comes after. I hear of almost nothing but misery and requisite software upgrades.

Shouldn’t I just keep sitting here, very happy with Mojave? I’m not a power user (or I’d have a newer computer; this one should get me through 2023 or so...).

Yeah im staying on Mojave for sure. Both iOS and macOS do not interest me. More emojis? yawn. Widgets? Id get an android if I cared. Discover trending gifs? I don't give a damn. new Siri features? zzzzz it was fun when it came out in 2011 though.
 
Be interesting on how well Big Sur will run on the MacBook 12" 2015-2017 , I have personally got a 2017 8/256Gb version and Catalina is sometimes a bit sluggish.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tekguy0
Yeah it's absurd. I have the 2.6GHz Quad Core 2012 Mac Mini (the top spec CPU), with 16GB RAM and an SSD. It destroys the 2014 Mac Mini, which they still support. It destroys the 2013 MacBook Air, which they still support.
So a 2012 rMBP with a quad core i7 and a GT 650M is not good enough, but a 1.1ghz dual core Intel core M and Intel graphics in a MacBook is fine.
I have a Late-2013 iMac, 27 inch.

Upgraded it with 32GB of RAM and 1TB SSD. It's still lightning-fast. No way in hell this is unsupported at the same time the 2012 model is unsupported!

All in all, this machine cost me 3000 CAD. Seven years later, buying the same specs from Apple would cost me 3500 CAD. Apple definitely has increased prices throughout the years, and used the Retina Displays as an excuse.

Why do people always think software support is tied to performance only? That's not (usually) how it works. In most cases it's some incompatibility that has little to do with raw power. Otherwise, why aren't you demanding Big Sur still support, say, the 2008 Mac Pro since it's more powerful than a 2019 MacBook Air?

Btw, increased prices? You know Inflation is a thing?

My guess is on the Nvidia card. It seems that they have giving up on doing Nvidia drivers altogether.
That can't be the reason, since the late 2013 and mid 2014 15" MBP with Nvidia 750M are still supported, while the late 2013 iMac with the same GPU isn't. There must be something else.

Yes it's due to the WiFi card installed the earlier 12/13 iMacs have the BCM94331 while the 14/15 iMacs all have the BCM94360 I'm sure an unsupported Mac OS installer will fix this issue for you.
Also can't be the (only) reason, since late 2013 iMacs too have the 4360 and are not supported.

Oh no my iMac just got old!

Oh hey, we have the exact same model/configuration! Sad to see such a capable machine unsupported by Big Sur, but then again 8 years is a good run, 10 years if you count security patches..

I'd just like to understand how this rather peculiar pattern of supported Macs comes into being. Can't (only) be GPU architecture or WiFi chip, since iMacs and MBPs from late 2013 don't differ in that.

On the other hand I'm surprised to see iPad Air 2 and even iPad mini 4 still supported on iOS 14. Would rather have it the other way round, but I'm not complaining.
 
RIP best Mac Mini ever, the 2012 model.
RIP 2012 Mac Mini - the best Mini that ever existed.
Certainly been the best value Mac I have ever owned. Got it as a refurb in 2013, when Apple prices were very low and the exchange rate was at its best in many years. Added 16GB RAM and later an external 1TB SSD. It has been running 24/7 from day one, and is still going strong. Outlived a mid-range Dell monitor and a Logitech speaker set all bought new at the same time. :)

Might try to string it out until the 2nd gen ARMs, and then make it a music station. Coz too much value is never enough.

What’s the best macOS for the 2012 Mac mini to live forever on ?
Maybe people already said this above, but Mojave is stable and great.
I am on Mojave and very happy with it.
 
Btw, increased prices? You know Inflation is a thing?
You know technology advances are a thing?
It has nothing to do with inflation. Apple is being cheaper and cheaper since just about the appearance of Retina Displays. Macs had way more value/performance back then. The turnaround happened at about 2013/2014.

32GB of RAM from Apple is close to being the same price as it was 7 years ago. Just look at the most high-end 27-in iMac. It comes with 8 GB of RAM, in exchange of a tremendous amount of 3 080 CAD. Incredible.
 
I have taken apart/worked on enough of these iMac's to know the slight differences lol. You can see the different wireless cards for sale on eBay, they are also used alot in the Hackintosh scene.

2012 Macbooks/Minis also used the BCM94331. My larger concern is Ivy-Bridge CPUs dropped and how that can affect enabling Sandy bridge CPUs again. I do alot of theCatalina support on the 2009-2011 iMac's.

That's seriously awesome! Do you have any resources that you've successfully used for for figuring out which parts can be Frankensteined into which older Macs to give them the ability to run newer OSes?
 
Darn. My late 2013 didn't make the cut. Maybe the new iMac's will be among the first transitioned over to the new Apple chip, otherwise I'll have to try to stretch it's life for 1-2 more years. 10 years out of a computer is pretty darn good though. This machine still feels zippy at some things, but noticeably slow at others.
 
You know technology advances are a thing?
It has nothing to do with inflation. Apple is being cheaper and cheaper since just about the appearance of Retina Displays. Macs had way more value/performance back then. The turnaround happened at about 2013/2014.

32GB of RAM from Apple is close to being the same price as it was 7 years ago. Just look at the most high-end 27-in iMac. It comes with 8 GB of RAM, in exchange of a tremendous amount of 3 080 CAD. Incredible.

Assuming an inflation of 2 % annually, 3000 correspond to about 3500 after 7 years and that's probably not that far off, so "nothing to do with inflation" is quite a stretch.
But even more important is the exchange rate CAD-USD; down from about 1:1 in 2012, today one CAD is worth just 0.73 USD so that alone would make for a price increase from 3000 to 4100 CAD, inflation completely aside..

Regarding your RAM example, you might want to consider how even on the "free market" 32 GB of DDR4-2666 today isn't magnitudes cheaper than the same amount of DDR3-1600 was in 2012.
 
Last edited:
Is there a way to keep my late 2012 "safe"? It's running great but now I'd be concerned doing anything sensitive on it like banking or shopping.
 
But what monitor? If Apple sold a display that didn’t cost $7K, I might consider that combination myself. As much as I loved my iMac 27”, I learned that having a Mac built into the inside of a beautiful display has made me sacrifice performance from regular upgrades because why throw out a perfectly good display to upgrade the Mac part of it? I would’ve upgraded a Mac Mini every few years.

I don’t need a $7k display. I think my use at home will be fine with another display <$1000. In the short term, I have a spare 24” 1920x1080 monitor that I can use for home duties (such as bill payments) until I need more screen real estate or more color accuracy.
 
Is there a way to keep my late 2012 "safe"? It's running great but now I'd be concerned doing anything sensitive on it like banking or shopping.

Apple generally provides security patches and the latest Safari version also for the previous two releases of macOS so you'll (we'll) be safe until late 2022.

After 2022, if you're doing sensitive things like banking I'd recommend switching to Firefox as your main browser which will probably continue to support Catalina for some more years than Safari will.
 
Last edited:
Honest question....is there anything that is going to stop working for those of you that cannot upgrade to Big Sur? I find it puzzling that people using 8+ year old devices are peeved that they have to use a 1+ year old OS. I assume I'm missing something, so I'm actually curious.
I still see people running Windows 7 or even XP sometimes for their day jobs, which is ridiculous, but for them, what's not broke...

People with 8+ year old devices are cool. For example I don't expect my 2011 iMac, purchased eight years ago in mid-2012, to run Big Sur (although Mojave would have been nice). The problem is the Late 2013 iMac was still sold new less than five years ago and a lot of people were expecting to run the newest version of MacOS for at least 5 years after purchase.
 
My 2012 Mini runs Low Sierra and will "go no further".
My 2018 Mini runs Mojave and will "go no further". (I already have Big Sur and will try installing it on an external drive later today)
My 2015 MacBook Pro runs El Cap and I'm -thinking- about "upgrading"... to Low Sierra. Maybe, maybe not... ;)
 
Apple generally provides security patches and the latest Safari version also for the previous two releases of macOS so you'll (we'll) be safe until late 2022.

After 2022, if you're doing sensitive things like banking I'd recommend switching to Firefox as your main browser which will probably continue to support Catalina for some more years than Safari will.
Thanks for that. Man, if I get 10 years I’ll be happy to buy new.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrUNIMOG
I have a 16" MBP with i9 and 32 GB memory with the 5500 Radeon. I also have a 2012 retina MBP (with upgraded network card that allows watch to unlock). The 2012 has 768 GB SSD 16 MB RAM. Both are running Catalina 10.5.5

On daily non graphic intensive use the 2012 performs as well as the 2019. Boots faster. I do not need intensive graphic work, but have some large excel files I use on both.

It is a pity Big Sur won't be available for the 2012 - truly the best MAC I owned. Hopefully there will be hack. I suspect the hardware on the 2012 (was the highest configuration at the time) can run it well.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.