Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
They don't want to mess with a formula that has been continuously working well for them. This could bite them big time in the near future as Google and Microsoft continue to improve their wares.


Agreed. The products were mostly nice upgrades, but not really exciting IMO.

So now that it's over - what did "it's been way too long" actually refer to???


I'm asking the same thing.
 
LOL
He'll appear on your new 5k display, larger than life!! :p

Or did Bono run off with the iPod Touch 6, the 4th gen Apple TV and that extra GB of ram that was supposed to go into iPad Air 2?

For all we know the iPad Air 2 could have 2GB of RAM. It was never deconfirmed.
 
I'm wondering this as well.

Even Sony's getting into the game with the little PlayStation TVs that pair back to the PS4 for remote play, access downloadable PSOne/PSP/Vita game, and cloud services for PS3 games. Basically the three core functions we've been asking out of the AppleTV for a while now. The AppleTV will kinda do the former with AirPlay mirroring, but you still have have the controls trough the primary device.

The Chromecast is out and does the only real function of the AppleTV for less (device mirroring) provided it can run some flavor of Chrome.

The Microsoft Miracast exits, for what that's worth.

SteamOS with desktop sharing and various flavors of SteamBoxes are rolling along kinda sub rosa.

Apple's kinda leaving it a bit too long, and really starting to bloat out the AppleTV's screen with "partner channels". Yes, bloatware. The only thing the AppleTV has going for it, that other devices aren't allowed to do is use the AirPlay protocol. Everything else other companies are doing, and arguably doing far better.

I've been tasked with getting my parents updated from a nearly decade and half-old CRT to a new "digital" setup and am shopping for middle-man boxes between their older entertainment cabinet and the new TV. They are a very Mac heavy household, but I can't justify the AppleTV as it exists. The lack of HDMI pass-through kills it almost immediately, without even looking at other missing functions.

HBO just announced they will be selling access to HBO WITHOUT having to go through your TV cable provider. I suspect Apple is behind this decision. It would mean being able to select the services we subscribe to instead of being fed giant packages with only a few desired channels like Comcast does to us now!


I think this is probably a difficult task and taking a long time to do. Just like iTunes when Apple had to coerce the music industry to accept selling online at reasonable prices.

But imagine setting up your own cable box with only what you like to watch and doing it with the ease of use and beauty that Apple provides on all it's devices. I think it is worth the wait!!

I can't wait to tell Comcast to take their $175.00/month and shove it.
 
I really wanted a Gold MacBook Air or 12" iPad or hybrid :-(

The last man sitting with an iPad seemed to have a larger device and all the last Tim said with new products and that they made it all posible because they made the hardware and software, I didn't expect it to end :-O

I expected a MacBook Air/ iPad hybrid ;-)
 
Big mistake not upgrading the new iPad mini to match all of the specs of the Air 2. At least it makes me happy that I can stick with my 2nd gen retina mini for another year. What fool is going to spend that much more only for Touch ID, minor camera improvements and a gold finish when the mini 2 is still on sale?

So funny how the first thing about iPads they touted was the mini's 100% satisfaction rate and then they do this.

Well at least they had the sense during the presentation to hide it away like the runt of a litter.

I really hope nobody at Apple thinks the rMini is in any way competitive with other tablets in that size range. That would be even more pathetic.

My year old $230 Nexus 7 has a superior display to Apple's brand new $400 tablet. What a joke. :rolleyes: Guell I'll just load Lollipop and enjoy it.
 
The problem with this is that Apple is trying to please shareholders and get the highest dollar value possible. iPhones used to launch in June, that changed. iPads in March, that changed.

So now Apple has like a year to work on iOS 9. But they only have until June to get a fairly decent version working. Then they have 3 months to fix all the bugs. I can see where things go wrong.

I'm pretty sure they have had a team working on 9 for at least 6 mo this if not longer. Any good tech company (and Apple is a good tech company) will be working on upcoming releases in staggering timeframes. Thye may even have a smaller team working on features they know they won't relase until 10.

As I have posted before, I would prefer smaller releases during the year. One or two features at a time. Having worked in software development for many years I know this results in more stable releases. But Apple loves their 'hype' generated with new OS coming out at the same time as their hardware. And while that's fun for consumers, it really doesn't help with stable OS releases.
 
Big mistake not upgrading the new iPad mini to match all of the specs of the Air 2. At least it makes me happy that I can stick with my 2nd gen retina mini for another year. What fool is going to spend that much more only for Touch ID, minor camera improvements and a gold finish when the mini 2 is still on sale?

So funny how the first thing about iPads they touted was the mini's 100% satisfaction rate and then they do this.

I'm glad that I stuck with my first gen iPad mini, which still makes this a viable upgrade. I get everything I was looking for, even with a technicality: Touch ID, more storage, and a more capable processor (albeit A7 instead of A8 or A8X.)

But, I agree about those who already have the mini 2: unless they need/want Touch ID or gold, it really is not worth it to upgrade their mini this year
 
My stream never stuttered. Looked great for the entire keynote.

Mine stuttered a number of times in the first 20 minutes maybe. This was via the app on Appletv. But after that it cleared up and was fine for the rest of the presentation.
 
Well,
Don't get the Event's message "it's been too long"

AppleTV = no update
TD displays = no update
MacMini = small update

Two of three of Apple products that have not had a major update in long time still as they are. :confused:

Actually, the mini can now handle a 4K display (according to Intel and the Iris chip). That is actually a big improvement.
 
Vote with your wallet. Buy the iPad Mini 2 if Touch ID isn't worth $100 to you.

I may just vote with my wallet and buy a Nexus 9. This rMini has me so steamed that I may also cancel my 6+ order and get the Nexus 6 to make it a 69.
 
Mac mini change means Firewire officially retired?

With the next Mac mini does that mean Firewire is officially retired for Apple products? Ethernet ports are still clinging to life.
 
I can predict the future!

It appears I was correct:

2s84vuc.jpg


I can predict the future – with the help of MacRumors and Photoshop.:cool:
 
Well at least they had the sense during the presentation to hide it away like the runt of a litter.

I really hope nobody at Apple thinks the rMini is in any way competitive with other tablets in that size range. That would be even more pathetic.

My year old $230 Nexus 7 has a superior display to Apple's brand new $400 tablet. What a joke. :rolleyes: Guell I'll just load Lollipop and enjoy it.

I don't know what you're on, but the display on my mini is far greater than either of the Nexus 7s.
 
I like the new iPad.

I would be tempted to get a iMac if it had a 42"-47" screen that could double as a 4K TV... The 27" 5K screen is great, but just not the right size for my room.
 
I'm glad that I stuck with my first gen iPad mini, which still makes this a viable upgrade. I get everything I was looking for, even with a technicality: Touch ID, more storage, and a more capable processor (albeit A7 instead of A8 or A8X.)

But, I agree about those who already have the mini 2: unless they need/want Touch ID or gold, it really is not worth it to upgrade their mini this year

There's plenty of insanely great upgrades for Mini 2 owners this year, the problem is that none of them run iOS. ;)

----------

I don't know what you're on, but the display on my mini is far greater than either of the Nexus 7s.

Wrong.
 
Great Christmas Gift For The Kids!

At just $250, the iPad Mini [http://www.apple.com/ipad-mini/specs/] is a remarkable value for the kids.
I see no "wow" factor with a Retina Display on a Mini.
I don't even see any difference.

It's got cameras, FaceTime, stereo speakers, instant access to free games, Pixar movies ...
It's the perfect inexpensive-yet-quite-powerful toy for a kid.

Add to that it does everything an iPad Mini 3 does and is thinner & lighter!

If you can forego TouchID - and really, does a kid need that? - at just $250, the iPad Mini is the perfect kid's tablet!
 
Last edited:
No Air 2 for me

I am a iPad 3 owner. After the A8X leak, I was hoping for a Retina HD x3 display(3072x2304). So now I am waiting for the iPad Pro/Maxi/Air Plus. At 12.9" x3, that would be 4096x3072.

iMac Retina is nice. But I would never buy it(2 PC & 1 Mac Pro 2010 on 1 display).It puts pressure on Dell and other manufactures to lower the price of HiDPI displays. A 30" 16:10 5120x3200 or better 7680x4800 display with 3 or more DP 1.3 inputs would be my dream.:D
 
Not so sure about some of these moves...

If I were apple, I would have retired the old Ipad Mini 2, and released the Ipad Mini 3, with the Iphone 6's A8/M8 and touch ID. It's in apple's interest that as many people as possible adopt Touch ID, as this helps ApplePay.


I think the Ipad Mini 2 hanging around clouds the portfolio, there should be the low cost option, the Ipad Mini standard, and the "best-of-the-best' Ipad Mini Retina that should have the latest specs that Apple offers, not two devices with nearly the same specs and just some minor feature differences.


As for the 5K Imac, it's not priced badly compared to the other Imacs, only about $500 more than the standard 27" Imac,

TO spec out a similar PC with a 5K display... well you can't really as there aren't many 5K displays available yet (though the 27" Dell looks like it will cost nearly as much as this computer)

However to spec out a name-brand 4K PC, it is in the $1500-$1900 range for similar specs to the Imac. and these aren't All-in-ones either.

so you are paying $600-$1000 more for a 5K display (instead of a 4K), for the niceness of an all-in-one, and for the fact that it's a Mac...

In my opinion, the whole Imac line could be shook up across the board to be a little more competitive. But, Apple seems to have no problem selling them, so maybe not.


My vision for the Imac -

I would spec them out like this:

21.5" 1.4Ghz, Same internals as Macbook Air. Including SSD - $999
The SSD will go a long way to making this device snappy, $999 is a nice price-barrier to be under.

ALL the rest of the models, Keep pricing the same, but add Fusion Drive.
The Fusion Drive is something special to Apple, and should be used more.
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.