3sec video is the best feature....damn like that cant be done on the iphone 1
Your lack of imagination is just showing.
3sec video is the best feature....damn like that cant be done on the iphone 1
I do actually, but it makes me feel better to know there are people more stupid than me.
Or at least equally stupid.
Part of the reason for the hate is cause when Apple copies, the media applauds Apple for the best thing since sliced bread. But when Android phones have slide to unlock, Apple starts a thermonuclear war.
Part of the reason for the hate is cause when Apple copies, the media applauds Apple for the best thing since sliced bread. But when Android phones have slide to unlock, Apple starts a thermonuclear war.
Well, if Apple could, take a picture in 4K resolution, And, let their "live" part of photo can also be taken in 4K resolution, and process it in real time, could this be much better than using 960*640?I mean, capturing =! displaying...
"I think its amazing my laptop can play 4K feature films, but can't edit and render them"
I'm not implying Live photos is as complex, but it might be something trivial that's preventing them to implement it well enough to bother...
Yeah, that's a classic Apple move -- take something Android or whoever has been doing badly for a while and do it much, much better. See also: Touch ID.
Well, HTC can start thermonuclear on this too. Who prohibited them?
What bobbins, zoe didn't fail as you say.. It was very simple as you seem not to say.. The number of units htc sold is irrelevant as to the success of a feature.. The app worked flawlessly in an incredibly simple way..The simplicity of the way that Live Photos will work as opposed to these other two products will be the main reason why it succeeds relative to them.
Simplicity is simple, by it's very definition. But creating simplicity is incredibly complicated. And for some reason Apple's competitors cannot seem to find the path to doing so.
10 year old "new feature"...
I guess the real news is the memory compression here?
now let's hope it'll be more open than the thunderbolt standards Apple designed a few years ago
edit: Nokia introduced it 1y 1/2 ago, I thought someone else did earlier but can't find any info, so I was wrong on 10years
http://lumiaconversations.microsoft...hose-moving-moments-with-nokia-living-images/
Well, HTC can start thermonuclear on this too. Who prohibited them?
You could combine a 12MP jpg file with a 720P video? From what I can tell, the Galaxy S4 had a similar feature, but only created low-resolution GIF files.Well, I could do it on my old Galaxy S4...
Well, if Apple could, take a picture in 4K resolution, And, let their "live" part of photo can also be taken in 4K resolution, and process it in real time, could this be much better than using 960*640?
But hey, iPhone 6s Plus still remain 1080P? and iOS still down scale everything on screen to lower resolution? Oh, no thanks. I need something more "innovative" and intuitive.
So a bully punches someone and your answer is no one is prohibiting the victim from fighting back?
I'd prefer to live in a world were things like slide to unlock or rounded corners are not given government protection.
Best feature? Nah mate, that's the A9.
It is literally not a gif. Cinemagraphs (ala Nokia, the iOS app) are literally gifs. Do I need to teach you the meaning of the word "literally" or are you literally that daft?
Yep, it is the Apple effect in full force. It is funny though; similar features have been available on other platforms but never been called more than useless gimmicks in most reviews.
A couple of examples are 'Animated photo' and 'Sound and shot' which both debuted on the Samsung Galaxy S4 and Note 4 in 2013. Not very different from Live Photos, but no one saw the point of moving pictures - or pictures with sound - when you could just as well use the movie feature...
HTC zoe.. They even put it up on the play store for other devices to have as well..
So when you look at this photo you believe the water is just suspended there like that? Can you not extrapolate what is happening? If that's the case, I think it's pretty unusual. Most people don't need to see 3 seconds of video to infer that something is happening when they look at an action photo...
![]()
Well, if Apple could, take a picture in 4K resolution, And, let their "live" part of photo can also be taken in 4K resolution, and process it in real time, could this be much better than using 960*640?
But hey, iPhone 6s Plus still remain 1080P? and iOS still down scale everything on screen to lower resolution? Oh, no thanks. I need something more "innovative" and intuitive.
you can make it by doing no more than simply taking a picture. So extra softwares, no hoops to jump over. It's as easy as pushing a button. Its convenient. its easy.how is this different from a gif?
Let me guess, you get some perverse sense of pride when you see mega iPhone sales numbers vesus other manufacturers. Would it make you happy for them all to go out of business, so there's at just one company on the block. Have you forgotten the 1984 advert.. If you think iPhone upgrades are lame now as all they are doing is stealing ideas from everyone else, can you imagine what it would be like if they had to think for themselves, make their own chips, make their own screens etc.. Steve is gone, the magic is gone..Imagine the ratio of HTC phones with the similar Live Photos vs Apple iPhone 6s and 6s plus soon to be released. Apple sales will crush it like a bug. .
This isn't anything new either, Edison stole **** from Tesla all the time![]()