So what happens if you try to send a Live Photo to someone who is on Android or upload it to Facebook?
It sends just the JPG portion
So what happens if you try to send a Live Photo to someone who is on Android or upload it to Facebook?
They'll get a jpeg and a mov file.So what happens if you try to send a Live Photo to someone who is on Android or upload it to Facebook?
Yep, it is the Apple effect in full force. It is funny though; similar features have been available on other platforms but never been called more than useless gimmicks in most reviews.
A couple of examples are 'Animated photo' and 'Sound and shot' which both debuted on the Samsung Galaxy S4 and Note 4 in 2013. Not very different from Live Photos, but no one saw the point of moving pictures - or pictures with sound - when you could just as well use the movie feature...
I don't see Touch ID or Force Touch as gimmicks. Both are hardware-based features which took a lot of time to develop, and make using the device quicker/easier.
Live Photos, however, is more on the software side, and I don't see it having as much of an impact as the two hardware features mentioned above. Simply a short video with a photo thumbnail, presented in a stylish manor.
Nah. They'll just know it works on Apple devices with motion and that the motion won't show on Androids, PCs, etc. It's pretty simple.
They'll get a jpeg and a mov file.
Yeah, that's a classic Apple move -- take something Android or whoever has been doing badly for a while and do it much, much better. See also: Touch ID.
Right. Also not stored in GIF format, and without the color palette limitations of GIFs.Gif animations that come with a still image that has a resolution that is 17x higher than the gif/video resolution. Plus audio, as others have already mentioned.
yep, sunds like a fun thing. I hope it gets wide adoption so that you can mail and text it to everyone, not just iPhones, Apple computers and Facebook...I think this is a cool feature. I don't know who did it first. Not sure I care. Interested to try out this implementation of it. Looks like fun.
I hope that iMovie supports this format for slideshow videos. For example, the high-res images could be in motion during the cross-fade or other transition, then freeze (optionally with ken burns effect) for three or four seconds, then the movement starts again for the transition to the next image. A really cool effect, with almost no effort.
Does the MOV file also get sent? I thought it was just the JPG.
I hope it's the latter, the MOV portion by itself would be pretty janky ...
How are live photos played on a normal iPhone 6 ? Can they be set as a wallpaper?
Clearly you don't understand. It's not some magical 'Apple Effect' that is causing people to notice the technology, it's that Apple did it right.
For example, the HTC One could only display the living photos on the camera, but if you put them on a PC, 2 separate files were created, a JPG and a MOV. You had to look at those independently. This is NOT the same thing as the whole process working seamlessly when you copy pictures from the iPhone into iPhoto. It's a HUGE deal, simplifying the process, something that you don't understand is the MOST important thing to compel people to use it. Similar with Apple Pay.
But I assume HTC's implementation was completely okay... because it's not AppleTurn that key and throw it away. Just another locked feature.
now let's hope it'll be more open than the thunderbolt standards Apple designed a few years ago