This makes me wonder if Logic X is further off than I had hoped.
That was my first thought too
This makes me wonder if Logic X is further off than I had hoped.
Just like pros read for content, especially about improved performance. To be perfectly honest I actually do think some pros look at the box to determine if it is a pro level machine. For the most part I don't think pros have a grasp of the underlying technology to even evaluate a machine. The mentality is bigger must be better.
You have nothing to base that statement on. Apples till sells its profitable pro hardware and software. Just because a few FCP users grossly over reacted doesn't mean the app is any less of a Pro app. I'm not sure what these clowns where even expecting, Apple had to completely rewrite the app and eventually had to ship something. Now the have a new code base to build upon.
You know I really tire of this ignorance. Just because an app borrows features from another does not imply that it is suddenly less of a pro app. The only proper way to evaluate any changes that might happen to Logic is to use it. Not for one day either but rather for several weeks to overcome muscle memory related to the old app.
I've seen this again an again with all sorts of users when an upgrade comes in. Something changes and the blame the app. That makes no sense at all in the first hour of the first day of use. A classic example is scrolling in Lion, break the muscle memory and adapt to the new method and find out that it does indeed work well.
This doesn't mean all design alterations are right for everybody. What it does mean is that knee jerk reactions are not always the right answer and in fact seldom are.
I'm away from my Mac at the moment. Can anyone tell me if the Jam Packs are included for this price? Or are they separate purchases?
NAMM is coming up in about 6 weeks; would be a great time to announce Logic Pro X.
Well, logic express was on my christmas list.... can anyone advise on what I should do?!
Who's got the time to download 19 gigs of additional content???
Poor showing, Apple. Really poor.
... I just wish [Apple] would not keep stringing everyone along and cashing in on the 'Pro' name they invested so heavily in.
...Here are a couple of ways Apple could address the mass of data problem.
- ICloud. It would be extremely easy for Apple to give users instant access via iCloud.
The 3,75 gig Lion-download is completed in less than 25 minutes for me, thus 19 gigs is about 3 hours of downloading (for me).
Nice for you - obviously you're Apple's target market.
Sucks for the rest of the world, though.
So the rest of the world isn't in Apple's target market? Makes you wonder how Apple became the most successful company in the world.![]()
How do you define "most successful"? It would have to be pretty narrowly defined for "Apple" to be the winner.
And how many Itoys need 20 GiB downloads to be useful? The topic is the size of the App Store download, after all.
...just trying to keep the goalposts in one place.
Anyone know what this means? Apple is turning to online downloads, which means no need for the optical disk drive in the MBP's..
This move is logical based on what happened with Final Cut X.
So the rest of the world isn't in Apple's target market? Makes you wonder how Apple became the most successful company in the world.![]()
Targeting people with deep pockets only. Insanely high margins that no one else could get away with.
App store only stuff is always going to be confusing to me. Ableton, Pro Tools, Cubase etc.. all have disks still and will for quite a while, as well as offering DL's.
Pro Tools will probably continue to be sold as a boxed product for some time to come, if only because of the iLok requirements that come as part-and-parcel of most PT packages (also, does Cubase still require the use of a dongle?). If you can't run the software without very specific hardware, then there aren't too many advantages for them to move their software model to a web-only implementation as far as I can tell.
I'm not sure that true pros are using the Jam Pack content. When I reinstalled Logic on my Mac Pro last year, I didn't even load the Jam Packs and such since I never use them.
I have extensive sample libraries, synthesizers and effects that far surpass most of what is included in Logic Studio and I'm haven't been doing this professionally for some time now.
Yes, ALL Jam Packs and additional content is included with the price, I'm downloading them as I type this. So for $199.99 you get everything included in the boxed version.
Well, logic express was on my christmas list.... can anyone advise on what I should do?!
Who's got the time to download 19 gigs of additional content???
19GB of additional in-app download so there is no way all of the Jampacks are included.
Yes, ALL Jam Packs and additional content is included with the price, I'm downloading them as I type this. So for $199.99 you get everything included in the boxed version.
1) Call me old-fashioned, but I'll miss the paper manuals.
Targeting people with deep pockets only. Insanely high margins that no one else could get away with.
I dunno, Avid seem to do fairly well in the Pro Audio field, and their premiums are pretty astronomical, so it's not like Apple are the only people who charge a premium for their goods.
Pro Tools will probably continue to be sold as a boxed product for some time to come, if only because of the iLok requirements that come as part-and-parcel of most PT packages (also, does Cubase still require the use of a dongle?). If you can't run the software without very specific hardware, then there aren't too many advantages for them to move their software model to a web-only implementation as far as I can tell.
PT has also been available as a download version for at least a year or two.
Logic has had pdf manuals only for years, the boxed version of L9 didn't have paper manuals either.
If anything, Apple is forcing an issue (trying to be trail blazers) and ignoring what some people want.
There's nothing wrong w/ offering a stripped down version of Logic as a DDL for those who want it....but why not keep a boxed version for those who wish to pay more, have extra content etc.
Some in this case is very possibly a small minority compared to those that would want it.
You do realize that that extra content you speak of is actually available in the digital copies. Yes it's a second download but it is free.
And even a Pro is going to be thrilled to get the same software and loops etc for half the price.
Now if you want to complain about how they didn't include Waveburner or the loops and such are still lossy and there's no lossless option even at a price, then there's something to gripe about.
I'm well aware of that, I'm talking about inlcuding the whole kitten kaboodle in a boxed set for those that wish to pay more for it. I'm hardly against DDLs, some people prefer more is all, some just want the bare bones. Why not include Waveburner and the loops as a download? I'm sure they have their reason but at least offer it as an option. Is Soundtrack Pro still included? I'm hardly complaining, just raising the question is all...and thinking ahead to what the next version of Logic might look like.