Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Hardly surprising as it sounded like a poorly excecuted product. There must be a window somewhere for a product that combines Apple TV's ability to stream iTunes content with the ability to access all the services like iPlayer, 4OD, Hulu etc on your TV rather than your computer. But the broadcasters and the studios have it all tied up for now.

uh, Roku?
 
The Apple TV in it's stock form sucks. It doesn't do anything but play Netflix and iTunes content. The only thing that makes Apple TV worth a crap is jailbreaking it and installing XBMC.

I'm sure it's the same for this Logitech unit as well. It probably has the potential to be huge like the Apple TV has the potential to be huge, but it's a market not understood by anyone yet so it's lacking features people want.

i have the appletv2, but badly want to get the new Roku and sell the ATV. Roku does so everything AppleTV does and MORE.
 
My father-in-law has a TV with Google TV in it.

Like most Google products they simply crammed too many features in. It's a TV, not a computer, and people don't want their TV to feel like a computer.

People say the Apple TV doesn't do enough. Well yeah, that's why Apple keeps selling them.
 
This thing must have really badly implemented software on it. Seriously, how did it get that unpopular?
It's not just the poor interface, but even more importantly, the lack of content.

Many networks started blocking Google TV units from streaming their content.
 
What...
 

Attachments

  • Capture.PNG
    Capture.PNG
    204.4 KB · Views: 291
The best solution for Apple is to join the rest of the world and release iTunes so that it can be added as a service alongside Pandora, Vudu, Netflix, Amazon VOD, Spotify, Blockbuster, YouTube, Hulu, Qriosity, HBOGO, iPlayer, etc. etc. on every device that people are buying. Because while ATV just sits there, alone, the rest of the world is being given more and better choices that make ATV more and more unnecessary.

You are missing the trump card of the AppleTV 2 which is AirPlay. With AirPlay, you have access to all of those services (except for those that explicitly disable it - but that goes back to the Content issue again - not Apple). Seriously - an AppleTV is WAY better than a box with all those services on it because it instantly solves the problem of the remote control that every other device struggles with.
 
Jobs: "The TV will lose until--"

Until there are things worth watching on TV and a way to organize those programs to duck around commercials. Face it: if you get crap on the cable, crap thru air, crap through iTunes, why would anyone pay extra money for a little box to get crap for more money? The one brilliant thing ATV does is integrate the home computer to the screen so you can store lots of music and movies on a computer and watch on a better system/bigger screen as an event.

The TV market is a puzzle to be unlocked, and Apple is doing it, but they can't force it because it is too big and too muddled a situation with all the entertainment companies and manufacturers, etc.

I'm pretty sure in 5 years, maybe more or less, there will be TVs with Apple-TV-type devices imbedded and Tivo-type data recorders inside. The TV, most of them, is still essentially a TV on the same functioning level as they were for half a century: get signal in, display signal for viewers. The industry will begin to change and make TVs more integrated to information and internet and home computers to give their sets an edge.
 
The lack of success in the TV space is not the fault of the technology companies. They have been trying many interesting ideas, but always stumble at the same point: Content. These devices will remain a niche so long as the content owners continue to deny premium content at reasonable pricing.

While that's certainly true I think there's two additional points that need to be mentioned:

1) Geek's view of reasonable pricing tends to be somewhat unrealistic. Look at the fuss recently over Netflix raising prices, you'd think they were demanding you gave your kids college fund over rather than $6 a month. Now the content owners tend to go in the other direction but as much as I hate to say this (being a consumer and wanting the lowest prices possible) but I have a suspicion the content owners are closer to the balancing point than the geeks at this point.

2) Google didn't bother even talking to the content providers and that's a systematic problem with their various projects. Put simply Google has a long history of ignoring copyright and content ownership and in this case it came back to bite their customers hard.

Ultimately whatever the future of TV / Internet Video it's only going to happen when the various parties sit down and work out a deal that's acceptable to consumers AND allows content producers to make a profit.
 
It's not just the poor interface, but even more importantly, the lack of content.

Many networks started blocking Google TV units from streaming their content.

Makes sense. You can easily hack past it but I guess the average customer shouldn't have to...

On the topic of Google TV being built into TVs: IMO it's always better to buy a dumb screen and plug a box with all your streaming stuff into it. That way, when the computery part becomes obsolete, you simply plug in a new box instead of having to upgrade the whole TV.
 
GoogleTV was doomed because of the lack of content. This doesn't infer that the AppleTV is any better.
 
I dunno about an AppleTV based television set, but I do think Apple are missing some opportunities with the AppleTV. I would buy up a more expensive version in an instant if it had a hard-drive that I could record onto, as it would allow me to simplify my current set-up.

This way would get the best of being able to record local TV channels, and get access to iTunes content or other video on my computer.

A blu-ray drive would be icing on the cake, but I doubt they're ever going to do that now.
 
First Nintendo misses wide on 3DS sales and slashes prices, and now Logitech is dumping stock below cost to make up for negative sales. I don't think that will be the last of Apple's new-found competitors to feel the pinch.
 
The Apple TV in it's stock form sucks. It doesn't do anything but play Netflix and iTunes content. The only thing that makes Apple TV worth a crap is jailbreaking it and installing XBMC.

I'm sure it's the same for this Logitech unit as well. It probably has the potential to be huge like the Apple TV has the potential to be huge, but it's a market not understood by anyone yet so it's lacking features people want.

You forgot airplay. I use it often to play music through my theater speakers. Also use it to browse photos when the grandparents are visiting.
 
Google Buzz, Google Wave, Nexus One, Google TV all failed... Waiting to see what happens to Google +!
 
The Google TV by Logitech was way too expensive.

ATV is at a great price point. I love mine and all we do is stream Netflix and some Podcasts with it. Airplay is a nice little add on that my kids enjoy. they'll run into the room and want to share something they found on Youtube.
I am optimistic regarding the future ATV with iOS5, but I'm not going to hold my breath.
 
The AppleTV2 was cheap enough that I was willing to give it a chance. The GoogleTV box was just way too expensive to try out.

Prior to the ATV2, I had used Linux, XBMC, and others to stream my media library to my TV and wasn't satisfied with the interface and control. ATV2 is much better - but far from perfect. At $99, I am happy.
 
love the quote by SJ foreseeing google.

i wonder if ppl are still doubting flash b/c it's the same type of prediction.
 
Google Buzz, Google Wave, Nexus One, Google TV all failed... Waiting to see what happens to Google +!

Im guessing the same fate will happen to Google Wallet. Infact I hope it does, They want your phone to replace your wallet by 2015 or something. That is something that would scare me.
 
I dunno about an AppleTV based television set, but I do think Apple are missing some opportunities with the AppleTV. I would buy up a more expensive version in an instant if it had a hard-drive that I could record onto, as it would allow me to simplify my current set-up.

This way would get the best of being able to record local TV channels, and get access to iTunes content or other video on my computer.

A blu-ray drive would be icing on the cake, but I doubt they're ever going to do that now.

This would be a great idea if the cable card technology was up to snuff. Browsing FIOS channels with a smooth apple interface would be awesome. Browsing FIOS on-demand lineup with apple on-demand interface. DVR done the apple way. Streaming to iDevices automatically. The key is to get it working nicely with your cable/dish provider. Currently I'm stuck waiting for FIOS to update to their buggy new 1.9 interface.
 
Does anyone really think that Apple has to team up with a television service? I think that if they just teamed up with Tivo, that would be a good enough match that people would purchase. I on the other hand think that if Hulu was able to strike some serious deals to get discovery and all the networks that my wife watches, I would drop my cable and just use them and hopefully do so on my :apple:TV. No need for them to partner with Direct TV or any service like that...
 
The Apple TV in it's stock form sucks. It doesn't do anything but play Netflix and iTunes content.

So they took features away from ATV2? Because my ATV1 also gives me access to YouTube, Flickr photos, tons of podcasts, and any Internet radio that can stream through iTunes.

And that was before I hacked it and installed Boxee. Now I can stream Pandora too :)
 
Google Buzz, Google Wave, Nexus One, Google TV all failed... Waiting to see what happens to Google +!

Google TV is still in its infancy, you cannot say the whole platform is a failure yet.

The Nexus One didn't fail either. It was highly successful in its target market, which was Android hackers. Same with the Nexus S.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.