Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I think that’s exactly the case. The M1 is a champ and that includes running DisplayLink near-flawlessly.

Also I forgot to mention this is over Rosetta 2. Can’t wait for native support.

Here were the resolutions I used in the video:

2 x 4K @ 60Hz
1 x 2560x1440 @ 75Hz
1 x 1920x1200 @ 75 Hz
2 x 1080p @ 60Hz
Awesome video @ruslan120 - I'm very impressed by your ergonomic monitor setup.
 
  • Love
Reactions: ruslan120
You'd be surprised. I am currently using a Mac mini M1 with my Apple XDR display and it works great. I am sure some people will scuff at the idea of running a $6000 display with a $1000 computer but with the M1 it works amazingly well. Similarly, not everyone will benefit from a multi display setup but it is nice that the capability is there.



View attachment 1678548
Holt crap, you exist.

Did you just have $6k burning a hole in your pocket?
 
I’ve been using displaylink on my 2015 13“ MBP, up to Mojave.
While performance was ok for Text, it rendered ‚unlock with Apple watch‘ inoperative because of some AirPlay shenanigans that are needed to make it work.

does unlocking with the watch work under Big Sur/M1?
 
There is a considerable difference between the 16” and 13” MBP, yet they are both labeled as “pro”. I certainly would not just jump on any Apple product called “pro” without finding out what it can do. I don’t mean to be argumentative, but to me these first run M1 Macs are entry (“base models” if you prefer) level devices. The first gen Mac Pro will certainly have true “pro” features...
Differrence maybe for "graphics professionals", not much for the other ones.
 
The M1 chips have replaced Intel chips in Apple's _low end_ devices. It's quite normal that low end devices don't support more monitors.
Show me a low-end notebook then not supporting dual external displays in the price range of the Air. Apple not selling cheap laptops doesn't mean they can get away with missing functionality with the cover of calling it entry level.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jido
No. The Air is an ultrabook, not entry level.
Wrong. It couldn’t be any more entry level.

In fact, despite how incredibly powerful it is, it’s Apple’s bottom of the line notebook!

Isn’t it amazing to see these three entry-level machines Apple just introduced offer so much performance? It is mind-blowing to call them entry level, I get it... but they are!
 
Last edited:
I had tried to use 1 external monitor before with my intel MBP. It was very flaky. It seemed like when the machine would go into sleep mode, and upon waking it, the external display wouldn't come on and I'd have to reconnect it to get it to work again. Is this another weird Apple bug that is an ongoing issue?
 
Tempted to pick one up to hold me over until the more powerful macs get released. Just wanted to be able to run dual 4k monitors.
You can easily run two 4k monitors from the Mac mini without any trickery. From the Mac mini Technical Specifications page on the Apple web site... "One display with up to 6K resolution at 60Hz connected via Thunderbolt and one display with up to 4K resolution at 60Hz connected via HDMI 2.0"
 
That would be the ones who think they're pros but don't actually do any pro work. Gaming does not count as Pro work BTW.
Actually, the M1 Mini would do very nicely for what I do, and I would classify myself as a pro, as I do work that I get paid for - 3D modelling, illustration, some light animation and video work. If my 2008 3.1 Mac Pro died today instead of 5 weeks ago, I'd definitely have one.
When did 'pro user' became the synonym of working with graphics at any level?

Wrong. It couldn’t be anymore entry level.

In fact, despite how incredibly powerful it is, it’s Apple’s bottom of the line notebook!

Isn’t it amazing to see these three entry-level machines Apple just introduced offer so much performance? It is mind-blowing to call them entry level, I get it... but they are!
Honestly I'd pick half the performance with twice the monitor support. And even the Intel ones weren't low-end.
 
Last edited:
Funny, I feel the same about all the people wanting to edit their lame family videos in 4k and complaining about throttling.
Why is that a problem for you? iPhones shoot 4K video... so it’s not unreasonable for people to want to be able to edit them in their Mac without stuttering? Thankfully any of the M1 Macs have no issues doing so without any hint of stuttering.
 
I had tried to use 1 external monitor before with my intel MBP. It was very flaky. It seemed like when the machine would go into sleep mode, and upon waking it, the external display wouldn't come on and I'd have to reconnect it to get it to work again. Is this another weird Apple bug that is an ongoing issue?
I have two 27" monitors - only 1080p plugged into display port and my 2013 MBP runs them all day, but I've stuck at El Cap - not sure if that makes a difference
 
But it can't support 1920x1200 in 270° rotation. Anybody else have that issue? Should i report/submit the issue myself?
I have a 1920x1200 portrait monitor waiting for the Mac Mini. Could you share more details on the problem?
 
Honestly I'd pick half the performance with twice the monitor support.
User needs differ, no doubt.

You’d probably be floored to know the huge percentage of notebook owners who have never even connected one external monitor to their MacBook, let alone two or three. 60%? 70%? More?

Apple obviously knew the current M1 didn’t satisfy the needs of more demanding pros, because they left the higher-end Intel MBP and Intel mini configs on sale.
 
Eh, DisplayLink is old and has always been glitchy and undesirable. Have to be careful buying USB-C docks to make sure they don't require DisplayLink. If you _really_ want the 6 displays, I guess go ahead, no other choice.
 
User needs differ, no doubt.

You’d probably be floored to know the huge percentage of notebook owners who have never even connected one external monitor to their MacBook, let alone two or three. 60%? 70%? More?
The same probably goes for 4K/8K videos, yet most of you seem to be obsessed with it.
 
Traders like to have many windows open to follow market movements and prices.
Or programmers. I use 3-4 displays at all my computers. One for coding, one for logs, one for whatever I am developing and one for docs/google. I usually also have the ipad open with a todo list and/or google chat.

this is great news. Second to the fact that my m1 mbp delivery date was just shifted from Dec 14 to Nov 27!
 
When I used to work in the office (yea, I'm that old), we had 4 displays (1 for email and skype, 2 for coding, 1 for reference). I could have certainly used more monitors for more references, instructions, 6 compilers. I think I can utilize up to 6 monitors for productivity. More than that, it won't really benefit my productivity.
Now I'm home, I use two ultra-wide monitors (34 and 35inches) and one standard 27inch. That's equivalent to 5 monitors for me.
Compilers?

Push and let the build server handle compiling, running tests, etc... it seems infrequent that I want to compile locally - certainly no reason to run six compiles at the same time locally...
 
  • Like
Reactions: bklement
Eh, DisplayLink is old and has always been glitchy and undesirable. Have to be careful buying USB-C docks to make sure they don't require DisplayLink. If you _really_ want the 6 displays, I guess go ahead, no other choice.
This Big Sur version is different as the Framebuffer driver code is written and supported by Apple. Display Link doesn't install a kernel driver anymore but merely drives the FB from non-kernel memory. It's very stable.
 
Comparing on price, the MacBook Air is not an entry level device. I would put it more in the start of the high end.

As far as in the Apple ecosystem, Apple’s entry level computing device is the iPad at $300 followed by the IPad Air. After that you have a choice between the MacBooks and iPad pros depending on your needs.

I went and got the the base MacBook Air M1 since I didn’t feel like paying the Apple tax for memory or a fan. I testing it out to see if it will fit my workflow.

As far as displays, I was and still am worried about missing a display.

My display setup before was the LG 5K and an LG 27 inch 4K. I still have two displays if you count the built in display of the Air.

I actually prefer the smaller Air display over the bigger one because it is a Retina display and looks way better.

Now, when I get my second LG 5K display, that is when I would be mad about only one display support. Hopefully by then Apple has released the 16 inch version with support for more displays.
 
  • Like
Reactions: torncanvas
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.