Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Hey,

I tried to connect both screens to the Caldigit via DisplayPort and it failed.

I tested another setups:

I bought a USB-C to HDMI adapter and connected one screen via HDMI and the other one with a HDMI cable using this adapter. The native HDMI screen works perfect at 3840 x 1080 but the other one is detected and works at that resolution too but the colors are fade, I can't make it working properly. The adapter is ok because it works well if I use it with a 2640 x 1080 34" more little screen. Why I can't get the right color for the 49" screen?

Finally, I was able to connect these three screens at the same time:
  • One 49" at 3840x1080 via HDMI
  • Another 49" at 3840x1080 via the Caldigit dual DisplayPort dock
  • The 34" 2560x1080 screen using Plugable 4K DisplayLink adapter via USB
I wouldn't need the Caldigit dock if I could get the right color via the Mac mini USB-C port. Could that be a software issue?

Thanks

Just to clarify you’re using DisplayLink via the Pluggable and not DisplayPort right? (Over thunderbolt only one screen can be natively connected)

It would be helpful if we could see a diagram of how things are connected to understand

I haven’t personally experienced issues with colors so aside from generic advice like checking cables (sometimes newer HDMI cables are needed for full display quality) and settings (could be a bad adapter) not sure how much help I can be

has anyone else experienced color issues?
 
Just to clarify you’re using DisplayLink via the Pluggable and not DisplayPort right? (Over thunderbolt only one screen can be natively connected)

It would be helpful if we could see a diagram of how things are connected to understand

I haven’t personally experienced issues with colors so aside from generic advice like checking cables (sometimes newer HDMI cables are needed for full display quality) and settings (could be a bad adapter) not sure how much help I can be

has anyone else experienced color issues?
Yes, I'm using DisplayLink only via Pluggable adapter. The setup is this:

  • One 49" at 3840x1080 via HDMI
  • Another 49" at 3840x1080 via the Caldigit dual DisplayPort dock
  • The 34" 2560x1080 screen using Plugable 4K DisplayLink adapter via USB
I tried three different HDMI cables, none worked. The USB-C to HDMI adapter works perfectly with the 34" screen. It must be some type of problem with connecting two exactly equal monitors or with the resolution, but I'm under the 4K and 6K limits that the ports support...

Thanks
 
Yes, I'm using DisplayLink only via Pluggable adapter. The setup is this:

  • One 49" at 3840x1080 via HDMI
  • Another 49" at 3840x1080 via the Caldigit dual DisplayPort dock
  • The 34" 2560x1080 screen using Plugable 4K DisplayLink adapter via USB
I tried three different HDMI cables, none worked. The USB-C to HDMI adapter works perfectly with the 34" screen. It must be some type of problem with connecting two exactly equal monitors or with the resolution, but I'm under the 4K and 6K limits that the ports support...

Thanks
I now understand - you’re using one of the two displayPorts on the dual DisplayPort CalDigit adapter. Ty for the info (again)... something to do with Mondays and reading comprehension on my part (lol)

Have you used the 49” with a Mac before? Does it have other connections and can you swap the connections and adapters around (are the colors off using different connections?) Can you test the 49” with another Mac? Another PC?

mainly wondering if it could be the display itself + using it with a Mac (might require calibration) or whether it’s an adapter
 
I now understand - you’re using one of the two displayPorts on the dual DisplayPort CalDigit adapter. Ty for the info (again)... something to do with Mondays and reading comprehension on my part (lol)

Have you used the 49” with a Mac before? Does it have other connections and can you swap the connections and adapters around (are the colors off using different connections?) Can you test the 49” with another Mac? Another PC?

mainly wondering if it could be the display itself + using it with a Mac (might require calibration) or whether it’s an adapter
I tried the two HDMI ports of the 49", same problem. Different HDMI cables, same problem. If I disconnect the other 49" screen from the HDMI port and I connect the other via HDMI, it works like a charm. Problem only occurs when both 49" are connected at the same time...

Thanks for your time and help!
 
Me wondering what would someone do with 5-6 external displays...
5-6 might be too much. But my MacBook Pro 15'' 2018 will make noise louder than the music when connect to 2*4K + 1*1080P monitors, which, is terrible. Can't believe that M1 Mac mini can do it in silence.
 
As far as I can tell, there isn't one with >1440 vertical pixels. It's the same space as two *pre-4k* monitors. I'm not inclined to spend that much money for something that isn't an upgrade.
There are a few 5120x2160 monitors which are wider than a 3840x2160 display but not as wide as two UHD displays of course. Still provides a little extra horizontal space if one really needs it vs using two monitors.
 
I can't imagine there's any appreciable performance without proper acceleration support. He's just showing desktop wallpaper. Unless all you need a bunch of static displays (minus the HDMI port monitor) it's probably useless for anything with motion.
Turns out most of the people who want lots of monitors DO in fact mostly want to display text on them to which they can easily refer as necessary. They are basically used as essentially static displays.

The market for people playing six video games simultaneously is surprisingly small...
 
  • Like
Reactions: MacUser2525
Interesting.

I have been considering an M1 but I have not taken the plunge due to the limited displays. I would need to drive 2 Dell U3818DW monitors.

I'm wondering if this will work?

I am kind of bummed about the 8GB/16GB memory limitation too.
 
Can anyone help me out? It seems super confusing the product you're supposed to buy...Is there really no single dongle/adapter that supports the displaylink driver from USB C that supports USB C power and dual HDMI?
 
Can anyone help me out? It seems super confusing the product you're supposed to buy...Is there really no single dongle/adapter that supports the displaylink driver from USB C that supports USB C power and dual HDMI?

Simply put, there is no way to reliably output to more than 1 external monitor on an M1 MacBook. And certainly not with full features. Check the DisplayLink forum to see what you're up against.
 
Simply put, there is no way to reliably output to more than 1 external monitor on an M1 MacBook. And certainly not with full features. Check the DisplayLink forum to see what you're up against.
But apparently there is a way with DisplayLink but there isn't a USB C to 2 HDMI out option?
 
this is so sad. Cheaper entry level laptops support 2 external monitors. But with apple®™ think different™. And apple sheep here praise that some 3rd party display emulator that works everywhere works here when it's NOT a solution. It baffles me that some apple engineer though "doi OnE EXtErnAl MonItoR OughT to Be enoUGH FOR aNyboDy". I would love to talk to that dude and ask him wtf were they thinking when they proposed that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MacUser2525
Obviously everybody would love infinite disk space, infinite RAM, infinite I/O, etc. But there are always trade-offs of cost, time, manufacturing capacity, and so on. And since there will always be improvements down the road, you have to cut it off somewhere.

Since these are entry-level products with a first-generation (for Mac) SoC, they decided to get something basic out as quickly as possible as a proof-of-concept that could be used to port Intel applications over and get some real-world testing and use. So rather than dedicating time to designing a desktop SoC from scratch, they repurposed a mobile design which, for obvious reasons, never supported multiple external displays.

For most casual end-users, they'll connect to one external display at most. Many will not use even one. So this provides a good test-bed for maturing the requirements, design, and engineering for future beefier products. I know it's frustrating. But if these initial offerings don't meet your needs, just hold on for a bit. It won't be very long at all before fully mature products are available.
 
  • Like
Reactions: name99
Obviously everybody would love infinite disk space, infinite RAM, infinite I/O, etc. But there are always trade-offs of cost, time, manufacturing capacity, and so on. And since there will always be improvements down the road, you have to cut it off somewhere.

Since these are entry-level products with a first-generation (for Mac) SoC, they decided to get something basic out as quickly as possible as a proof-of-concept that could be used to port Intel applications over and get some real-world testing and use. So rather than dedicating time to designing a desktop SoC from scratch, they repurposed a mobile design which, for obvious reasons, never supported multiple external displays.

For most casual end-users, they'll connect to one external display at most. Many will not use even one. So this provides a good test-bed for maturing the requirements, design, and engineering for future beefier products. I know it's frustrating. But if these initial offerings don't meet your needs, just hold on for a bit. It won't be very long at all before fully mature products are available.
They're entry level Macs that are faster than most of the Intel Macs in the product line, so everyone is trying to find ways to make them into Pro machines...myself included. We just need to be more patient.
 
had 3x4k. Love the setup
Testing if one is enough for me 1...(see screenshot)
guess what's the machine ?
just don't say...
Hey there! Are you driving this display using an M1? I notice it is 8k and have yet to see anyone with an 8k machine that works.
 
Me wondering what would someone do with 5-6 external displays...
Finally get a glimpse what's it like in the matrix! ;)

12800 px total horizontal and 2880 px vertical total resolutions

 

Attachments

  • IMG_4868.jpg
    IMG_4868.jpg
    212.7 KB · Views: 144
This great news. Lots of people are in the market for a $700 Mac mini to drive $6,000 worth of 4K monitors, along with a $1,000 eGPU.
I'm just trying to drive 3 old displays, two 2K and one 1920x1080, with my $700 Mac mini. My bad for misreading the specs, but it's weird that this isn't properly supported. My 2009 Mac Pro this is replacing drove 4 natively with the RX580.
 
Last edited:
I'm just trying to drive 3 old displays, two 2K and one 1920x1080, with my $700 Mac mini. My bad for misreading the specs, but it's weird that this isn't properly supported. My 2009 Mac Pro this is replacing drove 4 natively with the RX580.
I have got six screens for six months and I now I use only two. Three screens is a maximum configuration for me. When more then I am starting being lost where is what
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.