Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I can see the 15” MacBook Air having a M2 Pro chip available for $300 more, but my guess is that pricing would put it within $100-$200 of the comparable 14” MacBook Pro—if not $2,000 for a 16GB/512GB M2 Pro 15” MacBook Air based on current Air pricing.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: DeepIn2U
Just a note on True Tone…. While it’s great for print work. It really does suck for video work and generating feedback from clients who don’t know it’s on 😅
 
No one will debate this. Existence of fans does not a pro machine make.

Then again, remember the aluminum MacBook? The version that existed shortly before it was replaced by the basically same aluminum renamed MacBook Pro? Apple is basically doing the same thing here.
It's so unclear why the 13" Macbook Pro exists in its current form...
 
It's so unclear why the 13" Macbook Pro exists in its current form...
Probably because they have inventory of the chassis and because it ended up selling slightly better than expected. It also fills a price gap that they usually have available ($1200-1400).
 
But not everything happens for a 'technical' reason :)

They're likely keeping it in the lineup because their amortized BOM for the 13" is dirt cheap (compared to the Air), they can probably ramp supply easily, and maybe they make someone a good deal on them for an enterprise/education customer deployment.
That’s what I suspect too. Likely still around for their corporate/education customers.
 
Probably because they have inventory of the chassis and because it ended up selling slightly better than expected. It also fills a price gap that they usually have available ($1200-1400).
They call it a Pro but yet it doesn't have a 'Pro' chip they could just have a non-pro Macbook line with a fan, that slots in between the Air and the 14 inch. Or just eliminate the 13" Pro line altogether. It is the only model that isn't logical like the others. The others have the new chassis and design, yet that one has the old design. Seems out of place.
 
  • Like
Reactions: izzy0242mr
No idea! This 13” model should not have been released to the market. Why does it exist?

Yeah it’s amazing to me that the conclusion to this article actually recommended buying it. I suppose they make a compelling argument on paper but really the only true reason is if you want the Touch Bar, which seems vestigial at this point. It’s only worth it at a steep discount.
 
Probably because they have inventory of the chassis and because it ended up selling slightly better than expected. It also fills a price gap that they usually have available ($1200-1400).
Apple can always have Hon-Hai, aka Foxconn, recycle inventory and use THIS as the new MacBook, no pro chips. But for a plain MacBook it should start at $899 base configuration wiht a $250 jump for RAM 8-12GB or for 256 to 512GB storage.
 
  • Like
Reactions: izzy0242mr
Just a note on True Tone…. While it’s great for print work. It really does suck for video work and generating feedback from clients who don’t know it’s on 😅
Apple builds in factory-calibrated presets that make it a real Pro laptop.
 
But the Air can drive a 6K external display. Just for info.
Not in HiDPI, though. The Air and 13" Pro are limited to 3008x1269. That's the main reason I got rid of the Air and got a 14" Pro. On my 34" 5120 x 2160 display, it looks like a Playskool toy. And at native resolution, it's not HiDPI, and everything is too tiny.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.