Back in the day, we had FrontRow.Preferably the ability to have a tvOS like GUI and run tvOS apps in macOS so that it "looked" like an AppleTV would be welcome.
Back in the day, we had FrontRow.Preferably the ability to have a tvOS like GUI and run tvOS apps in macOS so that it "looked" like an AppleTV would be welcome.
This is my fear too. They'll hobble it with fewer ports and iffy thermals to push the "pros" to the studio, pros being people who were just fine with the mini before, including me.I suspect the whole point of the redesign might be to deter people from buying it, forcing them towards a Studio, or a MacBook. I fear they feel it wasn't sufficiently gimped in its current form.![]()
That's your response? My 2012 model has it and you're completely missing the point about a trend towards a version no one asked for or wants. Small is for laptops.One again, the current Mac mini does NOT have an SD card slot. I doubt Apple will ADD one to this updated M4 Mac mini when the current M1/M2/M2Pro Mac minis don’t have one
For only $299!If it's small enough Apple should have their own mounting bracket for the back of a monitor
Yep. Does anyone not think consumers are going to get shortchanged for whatever hobbled mini-mini they give us?For only $299!
Weird. I'm using two on my iMac and they still seem to be right where I put them. I'll try to not look away though. Seriously, though, you can just buy new cables, if you're bothered by adapters.They're more compact until you have to stick a dongle (or three) on them and waste money on external adapters that seem to disappear when you're not looking.
Not my experience. The ones I'm using cost me very little and seem to work just fine.All USB ports are inferior, they started out as a cheaply made, universal adapters, and all its subsequent iterations are still cheaply made, though not cheap to purchase.
The school where I handle support moved to minis in 2 labs from iMacs. Not because of price but because Apple stopped making 27” iMacs. We didn’t go with Apple’s monitors though. The cost would have been ridiculous with a pure Apple solution.Yep. Does anyone not think consumers are going to get shortchanged for whatever hobbled mini-mini they give us?
The school next to my home switched from iMacs to MacMinis this year... next time they buy new hardware it probably won't be Apple at this rate.
I used iTunes in the past, not as a player but to transcode files. My previous MP3 players did not support AAC.
Apple has killed iTunes deader than dead.
It is very unfortunate to me for optical media to fade away. Apple is always first in line to kill something off.
I believe it is all about profit. Apple makes no money from iTunes if used to burn CDs.
As they say on Turner Classic Movies, "Everything old is new again."
LP records are still around and are a novelty, especially at the price.
Flip phones, the dumb kind, are growing in popularity and I have one.
I couldn't disagree more with the idea of being stuck in the past.
Better than being addicted to the current style.
My Internet goes down soon for repair. It won't be pretty. Yes, I'm addicted just not to a phone.
Some of you young people don't know any different.
The world is not a better place because of the iPhone. Social media is making a big mess.
Yeah, disagree all you want. I'm old enough to know when things were simple and better.
Just because something is new does not automatically make it better.Or be that guy that complains about everything new because the 'old way' was better. Choice is yours.
that is correct but if one does things well then it usually is better. Otherwise what would be the point to change something if not to make it better.Just because something is new does not automatically make it better.
So small you can use a VESA mount to mount it to the back of your overpriced Apple Studio Display. Oh wait, Apple does not support industry standard VESA mounts. You have to spend $1600 for an Apple VESA mount. Not sure what is worse, the wheels for the cheese grater Mac Pro or the VESA mount
![]()
Hear hear! Also with Apple: smaller = more expensive
Is an Apple TV sized Mac Mini better than the current size for the Mini?that is correct but if one does things well then it usually is better. Otherwise what would be the point to change something if not to make it better.
Seems like you are unhappy about changes that happened in 2020 or earlier. Don’t really see your point TODAY about changes in a new Mac as compared to 2012 Mac mini and Power Mac series. That ship has already sailed. While I can understand your issues, it is the same issue that are a decade old. You could have posted the same complaints many years ago.That's your response? My 2012 model has it and you're completely missing the point about a trend towards a version no one asked for or wants. Small is for laptops.
It's clear the Mini was hurting vastly more profitable Studio sales in their eyes, but that's because they don't know how to make a actual desktop computer like the old PowerMac series, one of the best cases ever designed.
The Mac Pro is another abomination with nearly useless expansion slots in an insanely overpriced POS.
All that progress towards external graphics cards, game compatibility and useful features was tossed into the fire by greed monger Tim.
you could call it an iMac !Maybe they could build it inside a monitor! Imagine that!!!!!
Is an Apple TV sized Mac Mini better than the current size for the Mini?
What does this mean?It depends what Apple does but if they manage to do what is needed then yeah it is.
Seems like you are unhappy about changes that happened in 2020 or earlier. Don’t really see your point TODAY about changes in a new Mac as compared to 2012 Mac mini and Power Mac series. That ship has already sailed. While I can understand your issues, it is the same issue that are a decade old. You could have posted the same complaints many years ago.
With the whole SD card in a mini discussion, was you seem to unhappy that Apple didn’t reverse design decisions that have been made years ago on previous models. And while I can be empathetic your feelings about those previous design choices. Expecting today’s Apple to reverse design choices made years ago does not seem rational.
If you were trying to illustrate that Apple is continuing along a business path that is against what is optimal for consumers. I find that message was lost in how you expressed minor issue with a perceived new design as compared to a current model, when the issues are actually with respect to on going concerns (e.g., user accessible RAM/SSD, lack of external GPU, outrageous upgrade costs, etc.) that are neither new or unique to this specific update.