Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Even another day of thinking didn't help you come up with any gain aside from a few extra centimetres of desk, huh?
How is that even a question? Space savings is a massive benefit on all levels. Not just for a consumer but for everyone.

I really don't understand why you want to keep things big for no reason. There is tons of room inside so it gets smaller.

Remember the mobile phones from 90s? Most things (if not all) benefit from scaling down when/if tech allows it and this is one of those cases.
Smaller mini is win, if you don't see it then I can't help you here
 
  • Like
Reactions: _Mitchan1999
How is that even a question? Space savings is a massive benefit on all levels. Not just for a consumer but for everyone.

I really don't understand why you want to keep things big for no reason. There is tons of room inside so it gets smaller.

Remember the mobile phones from 90s? Most things (if not all) benefit from scaling down when/if tech allows it and this is one of those cases.
Smaller mini is win, if you don't see it then I can't help you here
A benefit on ALL levels, yet you cannot specify anything? Why take a passionate stand on something you're unable (or unwilling) to support with any examples? It's embarrassing you compared a desktop computer to a mobile device of any kind- it obviously goes without saying there are benefits to shrinking items you carry. Who is likely to carry a Mac Mini in their pocket?
 
- less space taken on the desk
- easier to move around (taking with you)
- less material needed
- more units transported
-as more unit transported, less CO2 produced
-less packaging
-possibly cheaper if Apple passes the savings onto customers
-more creative ways to fit it into desks, walls etc.


A benefit on ALL levels, yet you cannot specify anything? Why take a passionate stand on something you're unable (or unwilling) to support with any examples? It's embarrassing you compared a desktop computer to a mobile device of any kind- it obviously goes without saying there are benefits to shrinking items you carry. Who is likely to carry a Mac Mini in their pocket?
 
How is that even a question? Space savings is a massive benefit on all levels. Not just for a consumer but for everyone.

I really don't understand why you want to keep things big for no reason. There is tons of room inside so it gets smaller.

Remember the mobile phones from 90s? Most things (if not all) benefit from scaling down when/if tech allows it and this is one of those cases.
Smaller mini is win, if you don't see it then I can't help you here
There are a sizeable minority of Mini users that require the current form factor for server racks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TMax
There are a sizeable minority of Mini users that require the current form factor for server racks.
If you are getting multiple Mac mini, the addition of an update rack kit is probably not a big deal. But there’s probably a few caveats with that:
1) Horizontal installation fits in a 1U space, if the height grows too much. This could be an issue.
2) size and I/O of an external power Brick could be a concern.
3) Elimination of a physical GB ethernet port could be an issue
 
- less space taken on the desk
- easier to move around (taking with you)
- less material needed
- more units transported
-as more unit transported, less CO2 produced
-less packaging
-possibly cheaper if Apple passes the savings onto customers
-more creative ways to fit it into desks, walls etc.

Many of those advantages are dependent on if there is external power brick and how big that power brick-It is just an unknown, it could be a nothing it could be a big deal. But for basic desktop installations, a power brick hidden under the desk is a non-issue in my opinion.

Apple pass on cost savings to their Customers?!? I would consider that extremely unlikely, but it would be a pleasant surprise. More likely is if Apple realizes cost savings, there would not be a price increase for the basic unit.
 
Looking forward to replacing my 8/256GB M1 Mac mini with the upcoming M4 Mac mini. Not because mine is too old or slow, rather I just want one with more RAM so I can more comfortably play DOOM and QUAKE on Windows. That is, clunky Windows needs the additional RAM not macOS As for the rumored smaller size, I say YES PLEASE!!!
 
  • Love
Reactions: Cape Dave
I used iTunes in the past, not as a player but to transcode files. My previous MP3 players did not support AAC.
Apple has killed iTunes deader than dead.
Agree with everything you said. I too miss iTunes proper, but Apple Music [I do not subscribe to it - talking about the Mac app] does let you import CDs and encode them as AAC or MP3

Two links:


Unsure what macOS 15 allows, but with macOS 14, you can still rip CDs, thankfully.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TMax and jimimac71
That is just fine but my iMac is from 2007.
I’ve been a Windows person since 2010.
Once again, Apple ONLY!
I bash Apple as they deserve it.
 
The Mac Mini Blade - a 1 foot long bar of aluminum with speakers, ports on the back and front, and a camera. Perfect for placing under your monitor or pack 24 of them a 1U rack.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chuckeee
The Mac Mini Blade - a 1 foot long bar of aluminum with speakers, ports on the back and front, and a camera. Perfect for placing under your monitor or pack 24 of them a 1U rack.
A camera at ground level is like those Windows laptops where the camera popped up from keyboard level - it would be staring up your nose...

Good thinking but hardly smaller than the current mini though :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: _Mitchan1999
Many would love to have a portable/luggable desktop (and silent) computer that is not a laptop. But not at the cost of losing too much performance and too many I/O ports. It would be better if it was introduced as a separate product, e.g. Mac Tiny (lol) or even make it the next Apple TV. I always believed that Apple do not offer enough options to people and I am not talking about colours.

In an ideal world we would have a Mac Mini/Studio compact desktop that is still user-upgradable like in the old days (or even better, like the incredible G4 Cube) and an even smaller™ portable computer that you can carry in your bag, at work, at University, when switching jobs/cities every few months or years, when you go for long vacations, etc. Or fill a few needs at home (small server, retro game machine, AV media player, etc. As much as I like SBCs, there are too many times that they do not get the job done.
All of Apple's computers are Single-Board Computers (SBC) since they moved out of Intel.
 
I agree. I don't understand why you downvoted my post saying consumers aren't gaining anything from this miniaturisation, (aside from a few centimetres of bonus desk space.)
Sorry that was a mistake, I am on a lot of Morphine for for my disability and I should not have done that. I get fuzzy headed sometimes.
 
It requires less aluminum and other materials to make it smaller. Apple saves on the cost of building them and maybe even more on the cost of shipping them from China. Being thinner saves money for Apple.
Spot on. Exactly the point I was going to make. There are lots of benefits of miniaturisation ... for Apple. Smaller case = less aluminium = reduced production costs. Smaller case = smaller packaging = reduced production costs. Smaller packaging = more units per shipping container/pallet (either air, sea or at a distribution depot) = reduced transport and inventory storage costs per unit.

I'm a bit surprised Apple didn't do a case shrink earlier given all the benefits it can derive from doing that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: _Mitchan1999
Spot on. Exactly the point I was going to make. There are lots of benefits of miniaturisation ... for Apple. Smaller case = less aluminium = reduced production costs. Smaller case = smaller packaging = reduced production costs. Smaller packaging = more units per shipping container/pallet (either air, sea or at a distribution depot) = reduced transport and inventory storage costs per unit.

I'm a bit surprised Apple didn't do a case shrink earlier given all the benefits it can derive from doing that.
The gains are pretty limited to be fair- barely even worth involving the design teams and disrupting the established supply chains for case and internals. Also, in terms of cost and weight and CO2 emission savings, an plastic case would be a much more significant gain... but then that's a depressingly non-premium material.
 
  • Like
Reactions: _Mitchan1999
They can cool an M2 Pro in a laptop. Thus I would expect them to be able to cool an M4 Pro in a Mac super mini.
I tend to agree. The fans in the MBP with M2/M3 Pro are not that big and not positioned over the SoC, instead using the "heat pipes" to remove hot air. I would think that a "mini Mac-Studio" type design that is somewhere between the Apple TV and the current Mac Mini in size should be easily able to cool an M4 Pro to prevent throttling.

My concerns would be:

(a) That they don't offer an M4 Pro option at all, forcing buyers to the Mac Studio, or
(b) They reduce or remove ports, e.g. removing 1/10Gb Ethernet, SD card reader, or cutting down to 3 x USB-C/Thunderbolt ports.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.