Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
It's still hard for me to get what's better between M6 and M5 Pro.
M5 Pro is twice as expensive, but I believe the race is closer than we think, and M6 most likely beats it at AI.
This is really the most interesting question to me. I imagine we will see some comparative benchmarks soon enough.
 
Wait a minute. This doesn’t gel with what we were hearing before about new MacBook Airs coming with M6 and new MacBook Pros coming with M6 Pro and M6 Max chips. Now they’re talking M7 which wasn’t due until late 2027 at the earliest.
Tell us you haven’t been following this story for a while without telling us you haven’t been following this story for a while.
 
It's still hard for me to get what's better between M6 and M5 Pro.
M5 Pro is twice as expensive, but I believe the race is closer than we think, and M6 most likely beats it at AI.
It is hard to tell on a desktop. We need to see the benchmarks and the battery life in a laptop, especially the MBA. If the M6 can deliver the claimed performance at a lower power consumption then it has a purpose.

As someone else pointed out, what are we supposed to do with all this compute anyway? Clearly the industry is rooting for AI to catch on so all existing PCs are obsolete. I can occasionally load down my M1 MBA especially in the summer due to thermal throttling, the Ryzen 4600G in my desktop has a fan and never throttles. It's about the same performance as an M1.
 
Just a random thought, when Apple gets to version 10, will they called it the MX? If so, the should bring back the Fusion branding from the A10.
 
I would settle for higher efficiency, ie same throughput using less power, but then again it may not matter to you
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.