fraggle said:
Go with the mini. The 20" stand-alone display is reported to be much better than the one included with the iMac. Of course the iMac is a bit faster now. But as you can keep everything besides the actual mini box you will probably get a faster mini after MWSF '06. With the iMac you are "stuck" performance wise for its lifetime...
Buying a Mini and getting a $500 upgrade every couple years is indeed an interesting strategy that makes it worth looking at even if you CAN afford an iMac. You'll start out slower but end up faster! Food for thought as I advise my friends. Also: the Mac Mini can be transported easily to give presentations, or to set up at someone else's screen while on a trip. SOME of a laptop's benefits.
Platform said:
Now that we know all the fact about the new Mac mini
1. How would a
...
Do performance wise and what can it be used for
2. Since it comes with the 9200 with 32MB VRAM, and apple has said that the lowest card supported for core image is the gfx5200, will this be able to run Tiger with core image(apple will make some sort of a tweak to enable the 9200 for core image)
3. I have a Pentium 4 2.8Ghz
...
Could the Mac mini replace/be on the same level of computing as it(OK slower cpu

but less ram so would it compensate for that, and it would offcourse run OS X and i really hope Tiger too

)
1. What can it be used for? Anything. I do high-end graphics and sound editing on my 1.25 Ghz G4, and play UT2004. The performance of the Radeon 9200 is a mystery to me, though--people say it's quite good for a PC in this price range, but I can't compare it to what you're used to. Try a game in a store before you buy?
2. Will it run Tiger? Absolutely, in all its glory. Specific Core Image features of high-end video apps are just that: high-end, for high-end machines. You probably won't get those, and won't ever want them either. Tiger supports high-end hardware--but it does not require it. It even runs on a G3 last I heard!
3. It's a different machine from your PC on every level from CPU to OS. So so some things will be--or feel--faster, while others will be slower. And each Mhz on a Mac is faster than each MHz on a PC--because a PowerPC processor gets more DONE in each cycle. Plus the G4 has Velocity Engine (excellent vector processor) which really speeds up certain things. But regardless, you're in for a treat--the OS gets our of your way and lets you do your thing. The learning curve is short, and the rewards are great! And it will get along well with your old PC, so hang onto that for a while and have the best of both worlds: the familiar and the new. One of which will be virus-free
BillHarrison said:
Excellent solution: A 149$ XBOX plays Halo, as well as Halo 2 Very well, no dropped frames. Surround sound, HDTV output. Bigscreen capable.
A console's a great option, and one I respect. But there's a flipside. I like gaming on TV from my PowerBook (which the Mac Mini can also do), but I could never have a console as my main game machine. A console has low pixel detail and a blurry picture--that's the nature of a TV. I'm spoiled by LCD sharpness, and that's what I want most of the time. And a console doesn't let you download thousands of free maps, mods, demos, and entire games--something I demand. I've downloaded so much great stuff for UT2004, I've gotten 10 times more than I paid for! All free and legal. And I like having multiplayer on my regular Internet connection. Lastly and most importantly... trying to aim in Halo on X-Box was absolutely maddening. You can learn to do it, but aiming with a MOUSE is SO much easier. And a keyboard may not look "cool" but it has a LOT more buttons for weapons and things. So mouse+keyboard--or mouse+left-hand-pad (there are some cool ones) is the only way I would enjoy a 3D game. Few console titles allow mice. Halo does not!
That doesn't mean a console doesn't have its place--not everyone wants what I want--but that's the flipside.
Also, one reason consoles can play faster is that they run at low-res (640x480) to a TV. TV blurriness hides the defects of a lower-quality image. You can do the same trick with a Mac! Run your Mac Mini or laptop (or iMac, or eMac...) to TV at 640x480! Once you get past the blurriness of a TV, it looks really good! You can "get away" with 640x480, and get higher framerates that way.
So I do enjoy playing UT04 on TV sometimes.