The teardown doesn't tell us whether we could swap processors. If yes, that would be a great option to order the base Mac Mini with i5 now and upgrade to i7 when the prices drop.
You didn't get the point. Apple is in business to make money. they are not going to offer a cheaper Mac that will cannibalize sales of higher profit machines. I was merely stating their goal of being in business and making money is being achieved. and no I do not think making money means total success. and Apple is not 'stupid' because they chose not to cannibalize their Mac lines. ugh.
That is on the 799$ model and double the cost of the Mini. lol
here user can buy another cheap ssd and stick it in
...but a 2010 case with optical drive and some 2011 upgrades would meet most of my needs.
So far, so good.
- The Mac mini Server includes OS X Lion Server on top of OS X Lion. To buy Lion Server from the App Store is $50. Remaining price difference: $350.
You're drinking the apple kool-aid. Any idiot with 5 minutes and the sense to visit newegg.com can get 4GB for $35, not even on sale. The bottom SCREWS OFF without any tools and won't void your warranty. This upgrade is worth $35, max. Our new premium is now still $315.
- 4 GB RAM standard ($100 extra on the base model - so that drops it to a $250 premium.)
500GB 7200RPM drives are about $65. multiply by two and add an iFixit second hard drive kit ($70) and you hit $200. This is a tougher DIY project, and the cost we come to is the same. But $200 from $315 is now $115, not $50. EVEN SO, why not DIY upgrade the hard drive to a 7200RPM ($65, not too difficult) and buy a decent 2TB external drive for about $90? Over double the storage for $155, PLUS you have an extra 500GB hard drive to stick in an enclosure and use for whatever. That's $155, bringing our extra expense to $160.
- dual 7200 RPM 500 GB drives on the Server vs. a single 5400 RPM 500 GB drive on the base. We can't do a direct comparison......convoluted math......so Apple considers the 'upgrade' from single 5400 RPM 500 GB drive to dual 7200 RPM 500 GB drives to be worth $200. Remaining price difference: $50. (Sorry for the convoluted math needed.)
- Quad-core i7 2630QM processor on the server - 2.0 GHz 'base', turbos of 2.9/2.8/2.6 GHz (for 1/2/4 active cores) vs. the dual-core i5 2410M processor on the base - 2.3 GHz 'base', turbos up to 2.9/2.6 GHz (for 1/2 active cores,) ...[for other oems] price difference appears to be in the $100-$130 range. That means we're getting a >$100 value for $50.
The mini Server edition costs $400 more than the base model, and has three hardware upgrades over the base model, plus one software difference:
- The Mac mini Server includes OS X Lion Server on top of OS X Lion. To buy Lion Server from the App Store is $50. Remaining price difference: $350.
- 4 GB RAM standard ($100 extra on the base model - so that drops it to a $250 premium.)
- dual 7200 RPM 500 GB drives on the Server vs. a single 5400 RPM 500 GB drive on the base. We can't do a direct comparison, since it's impossible to configure the base model the same as the server model for storage. But we *CAN* do some funky three-way comparing. The price to upgrade the 'high end' non-server model to a 7200 RPM 750 GB hard drive is the same as on the base model: $150. The high end model also includes the ability to upgrade from 5400 RPM 500 GB to the pair of 750 GB 7200 RPM plus 256 GB SSD. The Server model also offers this same upgrade from its dual-500 GB drives. The cost for the non-server model is $750, while the cost for the server model is $550. So Apple considers the 'upgrade' from single 5400 RPM 500 GB drive to dual 7200 RPM 500 GB drives to be worth $200. Remaining price difference: $50. (Sorry for the convoluted math needed.)
- Quad-core i7 2630QM processor on the server - 2.0 GHz 'base', turbos of 2.9/2.8/2.6 GHz (for 1/2/4 active cores) vs. the dual-core i5 2410M processor on the base - 2.3 GHz 'base', turbos up to 2.9/2.6 GHz (for 1/2 active cores,) so assuming the mini isn't thermally-constrained often, the server has an equal-or-better for any number of threads processor. (As fast with one core active, 200 MHz faster with two cores active, and as-fast at four cores as the base model is at two cores active.) If the mini *IS* thermally constrained, then the base model would be slightly faster with single-threaded workloads. Unfortunately, these two CPUs are both OEM-only, so I can't find the list price for them - but a few other OEMs offer the choice on the same model, and the price difference appears to be in the $100-$130 range. That means we're getting a >$100 value for $50.
The Server model of the mini has always been worth more than the price increase. Heck, for the previous-generation model, you COULD upgrade the base model to be even with the Server model, with the only hardware difference being that the base model included a DVD writer while the server model included a second hard drive - and the server model had OS X Server. When you configured them 'equally', the server model was $50 cheaper! (So you had to pay a $50 premium to *DOWNGRADE* the OS, and swap a hard drive for an optical drive.) If you didn't need the optical drive, the server model was a steal if you were going to upgrade anything.
Good analysis. And I like the logic. I have tended to be a laptop person but with iOS 5 on a number of iOS devices in our household (particularly with photo stream), I feel it's time to have a desk top to handle the ever increasing amount of data stored on the hard drive. For neatness and form factor, I am going towards mac mini and with your analysis I am drawn towards the server model.
The last remaining question I have is if it would be possible when SSD prices drop, to replace one of the hard drives with an SSD? Can anyone answer that please?
An SSD is far more practical and beneficial on your main system that you use directly.
I *do* plan on using it as my main machine and take my MBA off the photo stream to preserve the measly 128GB storage I have on that.
I'm drawn to the mac mini server for the quad core processor which I hope will speed up photo and video editing I do. However basic it is, I find that even on a MBP (c.2007), it takes too long for video editing in particular.
And the ability to change one of the hard drives to SSD, would in my simplistic way of thinking reduce the number of moving parts which can go wrong with these machines and also help with 'firing up' speed and shutting down. But only if prices of SSD drop significantly from where they are now. So that I can do the operation DIY
In that case I say get an SSD then.
That's great, plan to get the OWC SSDs. The question that I had though was whether it was physically possible to take out one of the hard drives and just drop in an SSD? Are there any 'heating' or other physical fit issues that I need to consider?
The teardowns are quite useful for people who install hard drives.
The mini looks huge, but it is tiny compared to the average PC.
Still, after 6 years, and no one really sells a PC equivalent.