Apple wanted to demo the new graphics engine which now uses the gpu instead of the cpu.
Non sequitur.
Actually the os is bsd has been since NeXtStep days..... they just add new frameworks, kernel adjustments and an interface. This is how they are able to sell the os as being mature.
The OS is Mac OS X 10.5, i.e., Leopard. It's based on BSD but Apple has made a ton of additions and modifications. Each version of OS X builds on the previous ones. Tiger was completely mature when it was replaced by Leopard, which is only now reaching maturity.
Very clear as in what they want the investors to know. You have to read between the lines.
And reading between the lines, it was clear that Jobs' decison not to participate was partly based on his health, and additionally on Apple's desire to downplay tradeshows.
Jobs initially said his health was none of any ones business. If it was not for the investors the general public would have never known. Furthermore, investors have a legal right to inquire as to the health of a business (Mngt). If something went wrong then Apple could have been liable for a fair chunk of change.
Very debatable statements. In fact there's been a ton of debate here already if you look through some of the recent threads.
Well they don't have a monopoly on the media, just look at the news feeds.
The point was that Apple has a monopoly on news coverage during MWSF.
I asked Apple that question a few years ago when they had a product that allowed the apple binaries to load up in Windows NT. A killer product at the time but they would not release it due to the market ability to retain a message. At that time it was Apple is profitable..... that is all they cared about at the time.
This has what to do with anything?
I am sure you have read past employees experiences of working at Apple. They are the R&D for the computer world.
Excuse me? I believe there is R&D going on elsewhere as well.
They have lots of things they could release..... but they don't want to do it on someone else schedule or have to deal with the groan and moans of the investors shorting the stock post MacWorld.
The way I see it or another way to look at this is to think about having a party. You get to have all your friends over or you could invite all these people who don't really know you but it would be very good to know. Apple can always go back and book a booth at MacWorld, everyone adores them.
Finally.... it is all about optics and strategic planning, not the mini I want to buy but the positioning of Apple in respect to everything else.
I'm afraid I'm not grasping the relevance of any of these statements.
Also, you should learn how to use the quote button.