That's extreme level bullđź’© that certainly should be criticised more regularly. That's the kind of crap the EU should legislate against.Soldered in SSDs? Well that behaviour is a little harder to defend.
That's extreme level bullđź’© that certainly should be criticised more regularly. That's the kind of crap the EU should legislate against.Soldered in SSDs? Well that behaviour is a little harder to defend.
If true, 5 ports would be great. I would need to purchase one USB-C hub to replace an old USB-A hub. No big deal at all.
I really hate this. Nothing extends the life of an older machine more than storage upgrades.That's extreme level bullđź’© that certainly should be criticised more regularly. That's the kind of crap the EU should legislate against.
Agreed 100%, but it would make a difference for those vendors that tend to partner with Mac more often. LG, Lacie, and many others. It may entice them to include USB-C more (most of which already do). Apple doesn’t care about the rest of the accessories IMO.Desktop Macs form a very very niche market. This isn't changing anything.
The iMac isn't available with the Pro chips which consume more power. Hence why I specifically said M4 Pro. For the regular M4, I do believe USB-C power delivery could suffice just fine. Whether an Apple display which only outputs 96W could successfully power it is another matter though.The iMac ships with a 143 W power supply (15.9 V at upto 9 A), so a Mac Mini with no screen, speakers or webcam should presumably use less power (a display typically uses 50-60 W).
Genuine Apple iMac 24″ M1 power adapter Purple A2290 143W | MacBlowouts
genuine apple product! Used. Mint Condition Power cable to the wall Included! actual photos! fast shipping! ships same business day! iMac 24 in M1 power adapter Mint A2290macblowouts.com
Apple needs the courage to remove all but one USB-C port.
Haha, imagine, a desktop without a single port
Show me the Logitech type C Bolt dongle. I’ll wait. Bluetooth is not encrypted.
Who is the demographic for the mini? It’s supposed to be the cheapest option if you need a Mac. Now out the box it requires a bunch of adapters to even hook up a keyboard and mouse.
Just about any wireless mouse and a keyboard will work fine. That's what I use on my Mac Studio. I recharge them around every two months or so. Bluetooth range for my keyboard and mouse is intentionally limited via being low power. Most people just need 2 to 3 feet of BT range.
The huge bonus is I don't have to deal with wires on my desk going to my keyboard and mouse. That's a huge plus.
Say wha?Good. There’s no excuse for USB A ports in modern computers.
" It only had one disc drive when every other PCs back in the day, came with two."Apple has dongles in its DNA.
Way back when the Mac was released. It only had one disc drive when every other PCs back in the day, came with two.
The first thing you had to buy was an external disc drive or it was basically unusable.
preach 🙌🏻" It only had one disc drive when every other PCs back in the day, came with two."
And those PC makers are gone, in the dust bin of technology. Apple is the only original generation PC maker still in business.
Well, I guess what I want more is USB consortium raises the floor of USB-C cable and port Quality so that at least customer can have a feeling that USB-C is better, and not just because of a unified port shape. It doesn’t have to support 40Gbps for all cables, maybe let’s say they have to support USB3 speed Minimum For data transfer And a few of mandatory features? The way I see it, current USB-C standard is so messy customers are having an even harder time than before to pick the right cable for their use, especially those who want those extra features USB-C can provide but considered optional in the standard.On the other hand, this is what actually allows the migration away from USB-A, without cables and ports all having to become more expensive. For example, this makes it possible to still have a low-cost monitor with built-in USB hub for keyboard and mouse, without that hub having to support 40 Gbps.
They could have come up with a better color/marking scheme though, like the blue for USB 3.
USB-C is better than USB-A. It’s supports far more and is more versatile.We should not be accepting this on a desktop computer!
What are we doin' here!?
It’s the same mess for USB-AThe way I see it, current USB-C standard is so messy customers are having an even harder time than before to pick the right cable for their use, especially those who want those extra features USB-C can provide but considered optional in the standard.
Then don’t buy it. If you’re plugging a million devices into the thing you probably aren’t the target market anyway. Buy a Mac Studio or *Gasp* a windows machine
Really?Yes, why exactly aren't all the "get rid of the USB-A ports" folks advocating for only USB-C/TB ports?
Dongle$ for EVERYTHING!
![]()
I would rather have more USB-C ports than old USB-A ports because I do not use USB-A ports at all.
It's a rather different type of mess. A simple visual inspection can differentiate between a USB 2.0 cable and a USB 3.0 cable - pretty much any USB 2.0 cable can handle any kind of USB 1.x and USB 2. I just bought an 8' USB-C cable for charging things for $15, but it in no way would be suitable for a Thunderbolt connection. The Apple Thunderbolt cable is much more expensive due to what's involved in supporting a 20 or 40 Gbps data transfer.It’s the same mess for USB-A
How is it getting reduced to 2-4 ports? The M4 Mac mini will only lose 1 port in total."Up to 4-6 devices" is a LOT less than "a million devices."
But let's praise reducing 4-6 ports to 2-4 ports as if there is some victory for us consumers... or better, let's DEFEND it like there is some prize for us.
You don’t have to get Apples TB cable, there are other that are just as good for much cheaper.The Apple Thunderbolt cable is much more expensive due to what's involved in supporting a 20 or 40 Gbps data transfer.
These are desktop computers
There is no need to be removing a port that is still highly useful
Why are we trying to even further "shrink" and "port constrain" a desktop computer?
What's that accomplishing?