also, why is everyone saying snow leopard has a smaller memory footprint? on the spec pages, leopard needed 512 mb ram, and snow leopard needs 1 GB of ram.
No one is saying that. It has a smaller disk space footprint.
also, why is everyone saying snow leopard has a smaller memory footprint? on the spec pages, leopard needed 512 mb ram, and snow leopard needs 1 GB of ram.
I didn't realise, those of us who bought the recently upgraded macbooks, or anything after June 8 this year can upgrade for just £7.99 when Snow Leopard comes out.
http://www.apple.com/uk/macosx/specs.html
That's pretty cool.
A shame that iChat doesn't get support for other IM clients. No one I know uses AIM, they use MSN instead. But I hate the client from Microsoft, and don't like the other clients either.
I didn't realise, those of us who bought the recently upgraded macbooks, or anything after June 8 this year can upgrade for just £7.99 when Snow Leopard comes out.
http://www.apple.com/uk/macosx/specs.html
That's pretty cool.
They optimized so I could recover 6Gb even though most people probaby have 500gb+ of storage. Its an entirely different mindset... Its great.
Since a clean Vista install is about 7 GB, there's hardly room to trim 6 GB from that....
Windows 7 does knock about 1.8 GB off though...
Which is better?
- Apple putting 6 GB of fat in the system, then removing it
- Microsoft leaving the fat off from the beginning
Since a clean Vista install is about 7 GB, there's hardly room to trim 6 GB from that....
Windows 7 does knock about 1.8 GB off though...
Which is better?
- Apple putting 6 GB of fat in the system, then removing it
- Microsoft leaving the fat off from the beginning
Ehm, Vista doesn't have to support PowerPC too, does it?
Additionally, Microsoft has saved disk space by REMOVING applications, Apple hasn't.
AND, I'm sure that the Ultimate version (the only version even worth considering) would take more disk space.
Ehm, Vista doesn't have to support PowerPC too, does it?
Fewer files does make for faster imaging, cloning, and installation.why is disc space even mentioned in this topic? its pointless.
Fewer files does make for faster imaging, cloning, and installation.
There isn't a problem with the lack of hard drive space today though. Maybe if it was Tiger or Panther on an ancient machine.
Cloning does happen more often than you think given how relatively easy it is.installation is a good point, i can see where the smaller OS would come in handy for that - especially now since MBP's and MBs are only SATAI(i know it doesnt REALLY effect them but SSds will see a noticable change maybe).
for the majority of people though i seriously dont think they will be cloning that often, so it doesn't really matter that much (i doubt apple has this up in their to do list)...
Cloning does happen more often than you think given how relatively easy it is.
I mention imaging here and people think I'm the crazy one.
can anyone tell if apple has fixed a minor, yet annoying bug in the SL builds?
when the "show item info" option is enabled, and one has a large hard drive, the amount of free space is cut off... SO annoying. yes, I can Get Info the drive, but it'd be nice...
I had filed a bug report a long time ago, and I contacted Apple the other day, and they said they had no new info on it.
I manged to get mine like this in Leopard:
Icon size: 96x96, widest grid spacing setting.
just wondering which is the best external hard drives out there such as brands, and over all look! i was checking out iomega and some of there hard drives look pretty nice and feedback would be great!!!!
I like OWC drives.
umm yea i dont think that i will be trying that.... nice find though!
Wow your desktop is very Windowsish.