Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Mac Pro GeekBench-Whats your score?

My MacPro 1,1 (8-core x5355) currently gets between 10,320 to 10,410 depending which way the wind is blowing and whether or not it's hanging to the right or to the left. :p
 
Last edited:
Tesselator said:
My MacPro 1,1 (8-core x5355) currently gets between 13,200 to 14,100 depending which way the wind is blowing and whether or not it's hanging to the right or to the left. :p
Click to expand...
How do you get those scores with those processors? I get about 10,200
 
Mac Pro (5.1)
Original score - Xeon 2.8GHz (W3530) - 1066MHz ram : 8889
Upgraded - Xeon 3.46GHz (W3690) - 1333MHz ram : 14163

My other / previous Macs comparison:
Powerbook G4 (2005) - G4 1.67GHz - PC2700 ram : 940
iMac (mid-2007) - Core2Extreme 2.8GHz (X7900) - 667MHz (tuned, timings modified) ram : 3709
Mac Mini (early 2009) - Core2Duo 2.0GHz (P7350) - 1067MHz ram : 2949
iMac (late 2009) Core i7 2.8GHz (860) - 1067MHz ram : 8508
Airbook (mid-2011) i7 Mobile 1.8GHz (2677M) - 1333MHz ram : 5861
 
GEEKBENCH SCORE 19681 on my upgraded 4,1 (2.26 E5520 To 3.33 W5590)


Benchmark Summary
Section Description Score Geekbench Score
Geekbench 2.4.2 for Mac OS X x86 (64-bit)
Integer Processor integer performance 19001 19681
Floating Point Processor floating point performance 32653
Memory Memory performance 5231
Stream Memory bandwidth 5563
System Information
Mac Pro (Early 2009)
Operating System Mac OS X 10.8.3 (Build 12D78)
Model Mac Pro (Early 2009)
Model ID MacPro4,1
Motherboard Apple Inc. Mac-F221BEC8
Processor Intel Xeon W5590 @ 3.32 GHz
2 Processors, 8 Cores, 16 Threads
Processor ID GenuineIntel Family 6 Model 26 Stepping 5
L1 Instruction Cache 32.0 KB x 4
L1 Data Cache 32.0 KB x 4
L2 Cache 256 KB x 4
L3 Cache 8.00 MB
Memory 32.0 GB 1066 MHz DDR3
BIOS Apple Inc. MP41.88Z.0081.B07.0910130729
Integer Performance
Integer Score19001
 
Last edited:
Mac Pro 1,1 with 2,1 firmware flash. with the MacPro 1,1 firmware geekbench score was around 10500
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2013-04-01 at 11.05.59 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2013-04-01 at 11.05.59 PM.png
    152.1 KB · Views: 158
This is my base Mac 4,1 (W3520) (flashed to 5,1 firmware) w/32GB ram - 8260.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2013-04-02 at 6.46.05 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2013-04-02 at 6.46.05 PM.png
    87.5 KB · Views: 189
Just built a i7 3770K hacintosh for my partner for with a samsung 840Pro 256, 32GB, NZXT case/sealed radiator cooling for around $1200. Without overclocking the cpu is hitting 14,500+ on geekbench 64-bit. The chip is unlocked at 3.5Ghz and will easily push to 4.3Ghz. Haven't had time to push it yet.

My '09 MacPro with a 3.33 i7 975 hits around 11,300 (just ran it with an assortment of idle in the background)
 
I have a 4 year-old early 2009 Nehalem 4.1 W3520, with 1 processor @ 2.66 gHz, 4 cores. Running with the original 640GB HDD boot drive and with 7GB RAM installed, Geekbench gave me about 8200 yesterday

Today I added a Samsung 840 SSD boot disk and an 8GB DIMM, bringing my installed RAM to 14GB. With just these two changes, my Geekbench score rose to just over 9200. After reading many comments in this thread, I'm planning on upgrading to a 6-core W3680, which should provide a substantial boost. I'll repost when the job is done. I'm hoping for something in the 15-16K range.

Question - I haven't enabled Trim support for the 840 SSD - would doing that improve my overall score?


Note added later: I enabled trim using Trim Enabler. Now my Geekbench score is a healthy 9421. That's an improvement of almost 15% just by adding an SSD and more memory.

http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1838149
 
Last edited:
MassMacMan said:
After reading many comments in this thread, I'm planning on upgrading to a 6-core W3680, which should provide a substantial boost. I'll repost when the job is done.

Question - I haven't enabled Trim support for the 840 SSD - would doing that improve my overall score?
Click to expand...

Hi MassMacMan. Enabling the trim support may only give minimal boost in your score as far as I know though I may be wrong. Somehow, in observing Geekbench scores, they seem to be more dependent on CPU number of cores and the clock speed. If you upgrade to a 6 core 3.33ghz I think your score will increase substantially to 14000+ or higher. The increase in ram seem to have minor effect on Geekbench score.
 
handheldgames said:
Just built a i7 3770K hacintosh for my partner for with a samsung 840Pro 256, 32GB, NZXT case/sealed radiator cooling for around $1200. Without overclocking the cpu is hitting 14,500+ on geekbench 64-bit. The chip is unlocked at 3.5Ghz and will easily push to 4.3Ghz. Haven't had time to push it yet.

My '09 MacPro with a 3.33 i7 975 hits around 11,300 (just ran it with an assortment of idle in the background)
Click to expand...

Just built a similarly-specced i7 3770K hacintosh (but for myself, and with a Lian Li PC-V700 case). Moderate overclock to 4.4Ghz - runs stable and cool, geekbench score of ~16,700.
 
Virtualized mac score

Is any one else running osx virtualized ?
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2013-04-07 at 2.57.40 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2013-04-07 at 2.57.40 PM.png
    128.6 KB · Views: 160
Mission accomplished!

I posted earlier in this thread here that I had an early 2009 quad 2.66 Mac Pro that I wanted to upgrade. Today the W3680 chip and Arctic Silver kit arrived, and it took me all of 20 minutes (working carefully and slowly) to swap out the CPU chip. I had already upgraded the firmware to 5.1, added a 500GB SSD, and upped the RAM to 14GB to arrive at a Geekbench score of 9421. On my first shot at Geekbench after today's CPU swap I'm getting a score of 15317. Probably if I can find and shut down all the background tasks, the score might be a little higher, but for now color me happy.

http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1876257
 
LL


(64 bit score after firmware flash 4,1>5,1 and processor upgrade 2.66QuadN>3,33HexW)
 
Last edited:
Just ran it again with a bunch of other software running.
20181... up 108.
I thought GB was supposed to run better as the only open app.
Anybody know why it would score higher?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back