Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The retail AMD W6800 card has 6 miniDP ports. All the MPX modules have 3 Thunderbolt ports and 1 HDMI 2.0 port. One thing to note about the 6800 Duo card is that it also routes 4 DP signals internally to the other Thunderbolt ports; where the other cards only do 2.
AVkills, I'm actually really curious what your typical production work is with cards like these. Editing? Compositing?
 
The AMD version of the W6800 is 2500 at BHPhoto, Apples is 2800. I am ok with a $300 Apple tax given the additional feature of the MPX model (TB ports, silent cooling, no power cables required). It's the price of the 6900 that I can't wrap my head around.
 
The problem is, the big players like AVID take years to thoroughly address the problems in their software updates. They’re just so buggy and problematic on release. I’m not looking forward to any offices I work in switching over once the software becomes compatible with Silicon.
That’s the double edge sword of dealing with Pros. When stuff works, they don’t want to change their methods or processes. Hell, my Fox affiliate where I live is still broadcasting in 720p. In 2021?!? So, Apple pushes bounds with Apple Silicon and of course, Pros are going to complain the loudest. Whereas, MS simply bends over for the most part, Apple doesn’t, hence the wailing and gnashing of teeth in these forums. Last thing apple is going to do is let AVID, Adobe, et al. calling the shots on hardware.
 
Rounded prices are a sign that things are too expensive, like the $2800, it becomes ridiculous when prices are even more rounded, like the $5000 and $6000 cards.

I am aware that these cards are for very few (niche)professionals, I am also aware I am a consumer, doesn't affect me, so read the above comment as just an opinion, nothing more/less.
Rounded prices are a sign that Apple wants them to appear expensive. They might sell a computer with inadequate specifications in its pricepoint starting at $9,999 but if that were the Apple Watch Edition that needs to be sold to fashionista at vogue, then its “Starting at $10,000”.

Somehow this conveys that “starting at 9,999” has a smaller scope and you count up in one/tenths/houndreadths at a time, while saying “starting at 10,000” implies that the next step is “11,000” then “12,000” and maybe thats why it appears more “luxe” or stuff, idk, but surely a fun topic
 
  • Like
Reactions: amartinez1660
No worries...there are loads of wannabe pros here weighing in on what true professionals need and how Apple is screwing it up for them bigly.
I think I like to read this forum for laughs..
Sadly, I have to agree 100%. And I'm one of the people who used to fully support Apple's higher pricing for their "Pro" equipment in the past (and even bought some of it). The new Mac Pro is just stupid expensive though. If you do work on one that earns you enough money, you can obviously cost-justify it. But at some point, it just becomes a situation where it's clear they want to create artificial price barriers to keep everyone else away from it, rather than the dollar figure being truly justified by what you're receiving for it.
Apple has gone back to defining “Pro” as it should and is…people complained Apple doesn’t care and deserted them, now they are catering again and the real non-Pros will always complain..

These pricing are normal in the real professional world. This is for the high end Pros who have a business with employees and buildings, payrolls, 401ks, org-charts etc. not the one who sits in their underwear late at night surfing YouTube for ideals so their channel can have more “thumps up” when they create or post something. Great for some who make some big cash on this, but not as many as people think.

I make money off of my Apple gear, but I am way out of this league. These prices were “normal” when I worked for a firm and I don’t even blink when I hear of these prices. Just love to see the tech and say, “what if I had..” ;)

For those “pros” who are not at this league, a maxed out Mac mini M1 can do the job for your five minute videos or garage band songs that many will not see or hear or care, but you will feel like a “Pro” because you put together some sound bites and call it creating a song or feel like a director and create your B videos.. ;)

For all the “wish I could afford and have” they will always say: “Too expensive”, for those who these products are really for (and glad Apple is giving them options), they see it as a product producing expense that will pay for itself after whatever time they calculate paying it off to justify compare to their project(s) profit generation.

All consumers and pros at whatever level have a place now at Apple to go and buy and I am glad they are now going back to not blurring the lines with their products (home use, consumer to Students, semi-pro, to Pro.

My wallet and wife (not in that order) are happy when I can’t be tempted or try to figure out how to buy things I really don’t need in order to produce, but just want to have anyway “just in case I need it for something”…but that generally never happens..

So I will have to settle with a loaded M (whatever it is called) iMac probably in my future buying and call it a day..
 
$2,800*2 is not $4,600 buddy...
Are you blind?
Screen Shot 2021-08-03 at 8.30.30 PM.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: JMacHack
AVkills, I'm actually really curious what your typical production work is with cards like these. Editing? Compositing?
Well I get to play with a bunch of different stuff; but yes I do a lot of editing, some motion graphics + some 3D work; but I think the majority of use with the card will be testing playback in Millumin for driving very large LED walls for live shows (that is if we ever get to do them again...ok enough snark!) I also have the AfterBurner card in my sights, but need to see what the equipment vendors are doing. iMac Pros have worked really good; but a MacPro with a hefty GPU and an AfterBurner would be ideal. We use Barco E2s for LED/Screen management. Bromptom is the LED processor of choice we use. It would be nice to have some head room past 4 4k outputs at 59.94. We use the OWC Thunderbolt to dual DP adapters, which allow 2 4096x2160@59.94 per adapter if needed. We have used 2 adapters on iMac Pros before with good success. The AfterBurner card is more of a icing on the cake; not needed for editing, just something that can crunch a ton of ProRes files for playback, which Millumin supports.

I may dive back into Unreal again as this card will more than likely kill it for Unreal Engine 5. Going to be interesting to watch the virtual production/xR stage segment to see if people migrate to the Mac; although there are a lot of other considerations to consider also such as camera tracking and all that fun stuff. All of the virtual production workflow stuff is incredibly hard to wrap ones head around; unless you just get something turnkey. Right now I do not have time.

I also believe to get while the gettin' is good. GPUs are in short supply; I am actually amazed that Apple actually has them available this month (or they claim to at least.) Could be why AMD stock is low for the gaming cards.
 
  • Like
Reactions: amartinez1660
I’m curious about the w6900x pricing compared to everything else. Something is odd.

maybe availability/ stock is so low they priced it high to keep it manageable Logistically? 6800 will be easier to bin. Sure, it’s the fastest single card, but not significant enough to justify the price delta.

it makes the w6800x duo look like a relative bargain!
 
Same here, I just ordered the w6800x due to better integration with my system AND quieter since its fanless. Also one thing to consider, does the regular 6800 have 3 thunderbolt ports? I think not, so it kind of shows the ignorance in this thread from people who don't even own a Mac Pro.
So no fans drives the price up (LOL) and some extra thunderbolt ports makes it costs thousands make. Same chip, same drivers, just extra RAM.

Yeah, that sounds reasonable.
 
So no fans drives the price up (LOL) and some extra thunderbolt ports makes it costs thousands make. Same chip, same drivers, just extra RAM.

Yeah, that sounds reasonable.
Workstation cards are always more than gaming cards; workstation cards also have ECC RAM which is more expensive. An MPX module is going to integrate better into a MacPro than the off the shelf AMD W6800 workstation card; I really do not know how many times this needs to be said. And really if you do not own a MacPro nor plan on getting one; then your opinion is pretty much dead on arrival; we've already proven that the prices are not really out line for workstation cards.

Nvidia Quadro RTX A6000 is anywhere between $5000-$6000 and has 48GB of RAM; another workstation card; damn shame it does not work under macOS.
 
Adobe is slowly but FINALLY making their apps apple silicon native.

At the moment we have Photoshop, Lightroom, Illustrator, Audition, Premiere Pro, Indesign and Media Encoder.

Personally I can't wait for the After Effects apple silicon beta, which will come around october, when the next stable release will be made available during Adobe Max.

They took their sweet time, but I can see the whole creative cloud ecosystem 100% apple silicon native by march 2022.

Davinci Resolve and Final Cut are already apple silicon native and in the 3D world Cinema 4D and Blender are.

Once Maya, Houdini, Nuke and most DAWs will be apple silicon native, most of the software used in the media industry will be apple silicon native.
I can't wait to get the After Effects Apple silicon beta and new M1x/M2 chips later this year.
Yeah, but most AU’s are not even Big Sur compatible let alone Apple Silicon Native.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ashok.Vardhan
Well somewhat in Apple's defense, Intel charges a **** load for the W-series Xeon CPUs; the prices are way out of line compared to what else is on the market, ie AMD Epyc and Threadripper. The only conclusion I can come to is that Apple must somehow heavily rely on AVX512 or there is some BS contract between Apple and Intel. There is really no reason why Apple should not be using AMD CPUs instead.

I know most here want a Apple Tower using i7s and i9s with 2-3 PCI Slots; coming in < $3000, but that is never going to happen. What could happen is Apple Silicon coming in around those price points -- hard to say though.
Actually all I need / want is a Mac mini with a Ryzen 7 5700G, easily accessible SO-DIMM slots and a couple of M.2 NVME slots.

I currently use an i5 Space Grey mini for work at home but sometimes pop it into my bag to take to the office, which is cool because it's smaller and lighter than my laptop.

This hypothetical Ryzen mini would address all of my gripes (and negate the need for me to pack a portable SSD too), and would work today because some of my key tools don't work on Apple Silicon yet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mi7chy
Audio pros are all over it
What are you talking about? Audio unlike Video and Photo was one of the applications that so far benefit least from Apple Silicon. Obviously not talking about Logic Pro here but other DAWs and the larger VST ecosystem. For example, CPU usage is sky high in Ableton with compared to the ********* Intel.
 
Now available at prices that would make scalpers blush! :p
On the bright side, you can by a regular RX 6000 series GPU and stick it in your mac if you need one, and now that Apple has officially produced/sold MPX modules for the Mac Pro you're guaranteed a good long life-span of official support.
(That said, experimental support isn't always terrible either, Apple never released a Mac with a "Fiji" R9 Fury/Nano, but they still work fine for the most part)
 
Apple is already doing better in GPU support than they did for the last generation MacPro. I don't think they ever released a single video card upgrade option beyond what it launched with, despite the fact the whole machine was built around the idea the GPUs will do the bulk of the computing. Which was sad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JMacHack
Typically professional gear is better binned, and will have better support on the backend.
I've been into some of those Chinese factories and they use economies of scake everywhere. In the vast majority of cases they are given a spec by A.N.Other and that soec of course will differ from customer to customer but if you think they will not standardise where possible, (and in reality in LOADS of instances across a huge range of products), I have a bridge to sell you.

A lot of those factorties don't make a complete product. Some for example specialise in PCBs. A PCB for a washing machine may be made with very similar materials on a line adjacent to the one that makes PCBs for a motor car and they are two completely separate applications.

I do however agree with your statement. I'd guess though that 'better binned' applies to a very specific part or small group of parts on that product? But...better is better.
 
It may be made in the same factory as "less than professional gear" BUT these are not as mass produced as "less professional" components. So they cost significantly more to produce than mainstream stuff.

As with ANY low volume stuff in the world, cost is higher. I'm not saying that the cost is reasonable but Apple barely makes any money on these things I would assume.
Very low volume stuff yes, is typically specialist. But not usually all of it. Parts of that specialist gear are quite often mass produced.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.