Who says they’re not? Ya prob won’t see a new one til the m5Why can’t they sync the release schedules so the updated Mac Studio and Studio Display are released at the same time?
Who says they’re not? Ya prob won’t see a new one til the m5Why can’t they sync the release schedules so the updated Mac Studio and Studio Display are released at the same time?
Not so much a purist, as just genuinely asking if someone knows of a 32 inch 218 PPI monitor that doesn't break the bank, since that's what I'd prefer, but I'm not stuck on it since I haven't yet looked at a 32 inch 4K monitor in person, set to the reduced resolution I normally use for text editing, at a viewing distance of about 22 inches, which might be fine for me. You might be right that I'd be fine with 4K, since I've read many other people feel the same way, at least for some uses.ah yes the classic "retina purest" argument, do you actually sit like a foot away from the monitor and try to count each individual pixels?
i and many others went from true retina resolutions, to 4k 32inch and unless you try to zoom in and count the pixels, you won't miss it.
If they don't let you fiddle on the floor, you can always buy it, hook it up at home and try it out. Did that with my 34" widescreen for my 2012 MBP and did not have to return it.Not so much a purist, as just genuinely asking if someone knows of a 32 inch 218 PPI monitor that doesn't break the bank, since that's what I'd prefer, but I'm not stuck on it since I haven't yet looked at a 32 inch 4K monitor in person, set to the reduced resolution I normally use for text editing, at a viewing distance of about 22 inches, which might be fine for me. You might be right that I'd be fine with 4K, since I've read many other people feel the same way, at least for some uses.
I'm hoping one or more of my local stores has at least a couple of the better models on the floor where I can see them for myself, and that they'll let me connect my M1 Max Macbook Pro to them and fiddle with the settings. If text is sharp, on a nice bright background (I keep my Macbook's brightness at maximum), and contrast ratio is high (and detail crushing in dimly lit scenes low) for sometimes watching videos on it, then the rest of the graphics specs will probably be fine for me too--I don't do any higher-end photo or video work in which high resolution, color purity, etc. are important.
But when I do count pixels, I sit closer than a foot from the display, more like six inches.
Only TB5 has the bandwidth.It's 2025. Time to kick 60Hz to the curb.
Don’t think they will, I read somewhere that the TDP of the M3 Ultra is significantly more than M2 Ultra. They might have to go bigger at some point, if anything, to get the thermal capacity necessary if this trend keeps up. The copper heat sink in the current studio is already pretty massive, it takes up like 1/3 of the internal volume of the StudioI hope Apple don't shrink the Studio 🙏 because they did with the Mini. and I love the SD reader I use it most of the time. very convenient 👍
That's right. That's why need to kick these displays to the curb. Silicon inside new ASDs will have TB5.Only TB5 has the bandwidth.
Why would they keep the old model alongside the new one in their Apple Stores? That doesn’t make sense.I’m not talking about third-party discounts. The price in the Apple Store is still list price. And they’d have to lower that list price if they kept the old model around alongside the new one.
In which case there is no point buying the new Mac Studio. I’ve cancelled my order until they get their act together and release updated versions of both products together.Who says they’re not? Ya prob won’t see a new one til the m5
for print work isn't contrast more important than pixel resolution?You dont know what you are missing until it miss it. =) As 30 year print designer, there IS a difference. Been running 27" 5K since 2015. Now running 2 27" Dell 4K + 2020 27" iMac... its clear when side by side by side. 5K is crisp. others are no. OS X fault. These are Dell 2721QS. Its technically 1440 x 8000.
The ASD is $1299 on sale, often. Its 27" competitors are: Asus, $799, LG 5K, $999 -- Saumsung S9, $999, new benq 5K, $1199 -- besides the Asus which has so-so reviews, they rest are close in cost.. and cheaply made. Only the Benq comes close to build quality... with the price to match. No. No gaming. If I was s serious gamer.. buy a PC. simple.
View attachment 2490042
As others mentioned we can see the difference at a normal working distance. I have an LG4k right next to my ASD and I can clearly see the difference. I don't game and mainly work in text all day. The 5k crispness is something I don't want to give up, and until recently the ASD had almost no competition.ah yes the classic "retina purest" argument, do you actually sit like a foot away from the monitor and try to count each individual pixels?
i and many others went from true retina resolutions, to 4k 32inch and unless you try to zoom in and count the pixels, you won't miss it.
I switched to an inexpensive 32" LG Ultrafine display. there is no way I could ever go back to something smaller. a 24" iMac is a laughable toyWhere is the 30-32" Mac Studio with Nano-texture display ?
in 35 years of mac use, as a graphic designer, ive used a SD card slot maybe 10 times. And a fast card reader is cheap.
But dual screens... since my 8100... now 3 screens since my 2015 iMac. Something the mini couldnt do until the PRO, so a studio was it. =)
i work in text all day too, mainly word docs and pdf, the 5k crispness is overblown, i rather have the bigger 32inch real estates where i can see more document real estates than some margins of sharper text.As others mentioned we can see the difference at a normal working distance. I have an LG4k right next to my ASD and I can clearly see the difference. I don't game and mainly work in text all day. The 5k crispness is something I don't want to give up, and until recently the ASD had almost no competition.
Well, there is competition, which is good. Dell’s older UltraSharp 6K U3224KB starts at $2500. LG’s upcoming Thunderbolt 5 competitor for that, the UltraFine 6K 32U990A is likely to be in the same range.Not so much a purist, as just genuinely asking if someone knows of a 32 inch 218 PPI monitor that doesn't break the bank
and thats my point. There isnt a "rule" on what works for some vs others. Im not sure what mac you are referring to, but they have never "put back in" the SD slot on the mini. Was taken out on the M1... and hasnt come back. Never will. phones have nearly decimated the low end camera industry, and the need for SD slot.The missing sd card slot was so necessary to creatives and generated so much insults from reviewers that.. They put it back in.
Mag safe? That too!! 😁😁😁👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾
So your 10 times usage is someone else's 1000+ times. Some of us design art directors are photographers as well! Imagine that? Not hard to fathom. 👍🏾
Also had a dual screen setup since college... until 27inch 2023 imac nuked that need. Still works great too. And the SD CARD SLOT 😁👍🏾
Cheers all
27" 4K @ 3840 x 2160 shows the same thing as a 32" 4K @ 3840 x 2160, but the pixels are larger.i work in text all day too, mainly word docs and pdf, the 5k crispness is overblown, i rather have the bigger 32inch real estates where i can see more document real estates than some margins of sharper text.
color is, I calibrate frequently. with a spyder. However, the fact that my screen is 4 years old, with 60 hour a week use, is not lost on me...for print work isn't contrast more important than pixel resolution?
and yet OLED is much more color accurate than ASD's led...color is, I calibrate frequently. with a spyder. However, the fact that my screen is 4 years old, with 60 hour a week use, is not lost on me...
its actually not. Colors might be more "vivid", and more accurate than TN displays... but ASDs color is nearly 100% accurate in sRGB. If someone made an OLED 5K, it would be worth a look. But Id worry about burn in for my workflow. Mini LED is where I want to be. OLED blacks arent great, they give off a blue/purple cast. Reviews for ASDs always get knocks for price, ergonomics, and gaming... which are, yea, Apple and Apple and its not for gaming. I certainly don't understand the cost (although I posted earlier about the cost vs other 5K screens).and yet OLED is much more color accurate than ASD's led...
what..oled black is literally black, since the pixels are switched off entirely. you don't get more black than oled black. while ASD's black has a grey hull to it, a symptom of led backlit.OLED blacks arent great, they give off a blue/purple cast.