Squire
macrumors 68000
johnnyjibbs said:.Mac has always been pants to me - it's so OS 10.1. And every update seems to mean just a new release of Backup. Big deal.
The reason it has so few subscribers (let's face it, it has) is because there is no killer app. If Apple charged $50 a year for the web space and a decent killer non-web-based HTML editor for dummies (something I was hoping Pages would be able to handle) - something like Netscape Composer but that can produce non-proffessional but decent-looking personal websites - then I and many more Mac (and Windows) users would jump on board. Homepage is half-arsed and completely sucks and I can't afford or need Dreamweaver, etc. Know what I mean?
They need a complete overhaul and I'd part with the cash.
Good points. But where do you get the idea that .Mac has so few subscribers? Is that fact or just your guess? The reason I ask is that a month or so ago, I was reading an article about the latest version of Quicken and the Intuit developers claimed that over half the Quicken users were also .Mac subscribers. (I'm pretty sure it said that but I can't find the story now.)
I did find this article, though:
http://dotmac.info/index.html/news/130/
.Mac subscribers top 400,000 in 2003. That's up from 180,000 in 2002 and down from the 2.2 million iTools subscribers Apple had.
Squire