Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Talking about hints, I asked you why we have AMD APU hints in macOS beta and no single Hity about ARM? at least refertence to ARM's GPUs should be there, dont you think?

Why?
[automerge]1582598524[/automerge]
If ARM Macs are not coming out until some time in 2021, there's a very good chance we won't see those hints until the next major release of macOS (10.16) at WWDC 2020.
 
WWDC 2020 introduces the API's etc. to make apps work on ARM for the Mac.

December 2020 or more likely March 2021 for the product.


This. I understand Kuo is saying the product will ship in first half of 2021....

But I want to know when will it be announced? Normally Apple doesn't announce products before just before they ship... However, there are some exceptions, like when they need developers to prepare.

This is a significant change and Apple will want developers prepared by the time this product launches.

I was hoping it would be announced to developers at WWDC this year and still hope that... but that does seem a little early now.

Maybe towards the end of the year they will announce the APIs and other developer stuff.
 
I am going to get a new 16” MacBook Pro in mid-2020. If the news is true then it will be the second and the last MacBook Pro I bought with Intel processors. I agreed with someone else that Apple should maintain 2 product lines with Intel and ARM processors and have macOS capable to run on both hardware for at least 10 years. With the switch of the ARM processor, not only that we could not run Bootcamp anymore, it will also hinder people to run Windows VM using VMware Fusion, Parallels Desktop or Oracle Virtualbox. I am not so eager to see the switch of processor though.
[automerge]1582598949[/automerge]
12” MacBook making a return?
Probably not
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rednow
As an option, sure. As a replacement, it'd put a quick end to Mac use in corporate environments.

and it'd kiss gaming goodbye. Sure you might have iPad games, but the big titles would never port, and losing bootcamp would be the final fork in Mac gaming.


This is true....and I will be sad about that.

However, I think most games that run on popular game engines like Unity and Unreal Engine will actually get increased performance.

And yea there are a lot of big titles these days that run on these engines. However, many that do not, and these games will not port, and this will be sad for people like me.
 
Definitely getting the 2020 Intel MBP then. There will inevitably be a transition phase, using a "rosetta"-like translation layer for old Intel apps, and it'll be couple years or so before things are basically ironed out. The 2020 MBP will be the calm before the storm, with a hopefully improved keyboard over the 2018 model I have. That alone will make it worth it.
 
I am going to get a new 16” MacBook Pro in mid-2020. If the news is true then it will be the second and the last MacBook Pro I bought with Intel processors. I agreed with someone else that Apple should maintain 2 product lines with Intel and ARM processors and have macOS capable to run on both hardware for at least 10 years. With the switch of the ARM processor, not only that we could not run Bootcamp anymore, it will also hinder people to run Windows VM using VMware Fusion, Parallels Desktop or Oracle Virtualbox. I am not so eager to see the switch of processor though.
[automerge]1582598949[/automerge]

Probably not

10 years is a bit extreme. By then they may have moved on to SwiftOS
[automerge]1582599458[/automerge]
Definitely getting the 2020 Intel MBP then. There will inevitably be a transition phase, using a "rosetta"-like translation layer for old Intel apps, and it'll be couple years or so before things are basically ironed out. The 2020 MBP will be the calm before the storm, with a hopefully improved keyboard over the 2018 model I have. That alone will make it worth it.

yep. I’ll get one of each, probably. X86 for daily use, ARM for development and experimentation.
 
Last edited:
I am going to get a new 16” MacBook Pro in mid-2020. If the news is true then it will be the second and the last MacBook Pro I bought with Intel processors. I agreed with someone else that Apple should maintain 2 product lines with Intel and ARM processors and have macOS capable to run on both hardware for at least 10 years. With the switch of the ARM processor, not only that we could not run Bootcamp anymore, it will also hinder people to run Windows VM using VMware Fusion, Parallels Desktop or Oracle Virtualbox. I am not so eager to see the switch of processor though.
[automerge]1582598949[/automerge]

Probably not

Exactly my thinking. What are your thoughts on what the new 2020 16” mbp could have? I’m not so sure, if they will implement a mini LED display, what do you think about the camera, wifi6 etc
 
Nobody here sees the obvious? Apple is going to a cloud computing business model and access to the great CPU in the sky will require an ARM device and a subscription. You can run any software you like on VMs for Mac OS, Windows, Linux, etc.
 
Your response makes no sense. I said CISC typically uses microcode. You responded “not always.” That’s what “typically means.” Not always.

However, it has been several decades since there has been a commercial CISC processor that did NOT use microcode. Every Intel and AMD processor has for at least 25-30 years.

Not sure why you mention “gates,” but you should know that “gates” are an unreliable measure of anything. There is no agreement on what a “gate” means, so people count transistors, not gates.

As for why Intel/AMD use more, it’s because they need to - the instruction decoder, microcode ROM, complicated memory contention circuits, etc. all require it. But that doesn’t mean they aren’t using microcode. They certainly are. You can even see the microcode ROMs on die photos - they are quite visible.

I know whats microcode, even we can update it, as I said, decoding a single instruction into many RISC is not thge only way, there's no silver-bullet ingoing risc if you dont process code quicker, few ASIC so some instruction decode and process it with data loaded along in the cache, only requiring another cycle to store the result, sometimes processing may time few more cycles to propagate, but allways 1 cycle and 1 or more instrucitons processed. that's Zen, ARM just do plain old pipeline prediction.

(unless each component micro-Op happens to be scheduled simultaneously because of lack of dependency and available resources).

Thanks

You’re hilarious. Where do you get this stuff?

I'm not retired .

There have been dozens of leaks over the years. There are WIDE OPEN indications:

- apple integrating iOS frameworks and Uikit
- apple dropping the 32-bit runtime
- carbon is gone
- KEXTs are now gone
- apps must now be signed
- the OS now is in its own read-only partition
- ARM chips do more and more (T2) in macs
- ABI changes in swift
- Mac App store
- bytecode
- catalyst

Apple is taking it step by step.

All and everyone has its own justificatrion, absolutely none implies cpu platform, catalyst its both and startyegy to bring to macos ipad apps, as to buold an arm-friendly or arm-stable app ecosystem just in case they launch a dual cpu platform as MS, a solid coue would be seeing an ARM VM running iPad Binaries, but no, Apple took the time and effort to build API targeting two vastly different binaries.

I worked with Jim Keller. He was responsible for the external bus and I was responsible for the integer execution units and instruction scheduler (and at one point the floating point execution unit).

I kind of lost what you are trying to say there at the end.

By the way, I don’t intend to be snippy. It’s just weird when people try to tell me how CPUs work.
Mike Filippo, I said the same, but I cant as "Switching architectures is trivial as long as your code doesn’t contain in-line assembly, and doesn’t make assumptions about big endIan or little endIan data representation" with my experience, sound pretty blatant to assume it as TRIVIAL, try doing that with Tesselate algorithm.
 
Nobody here sees the obvious? Apple is going to a cloud computing business model and access to the great CPU in the sky will require an ARM device and a subscription. You can run any software you like on VMs for Mac OS, Windows, Linux, etc.
There's nothing stopping Intel devices from accessing cloud services.
 
I think Apple discovered a long time ago that all most users do with their Macs is web browsing and watch Youtube videos. Most users would be happy to have an iPad with a keyboard attached.

I would never by a Mac that can't run VMware or some other virtual machine software that allows a virtual Linux machine.
 
How about:

Apple custom 5nm ARM / 7 nm AMD Zen chiplet based processor. native ARM + native x86 faster than intel itself can deliver.
 
I think Apple discovered a long time ago that all most users do with their Macs is web browsing and watch Youtube videos. Most users would be happy to have an iPad with a keyboard attached.

I would never by a Mac that can't run VMware or some other virtual machine software that allows a virtual Linux machine.
Yep.
But niche consumers like you will always be able to buy the $6000 Mac Pro option. That’s who that’s aimed and priced for. The tiny niche market that likes to gripe but will most likely eventually just get the newest ARM Mac.
 
I'm intrigued about the prospect of an ARM based Mac, but I worry about the software incompatibility towards macOS based apps.
Not interested in running iOS apps on a laptop as the software is simply not up to par with macOS counterparts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cardfan and dspdoc
I'm intrigued about the prospect of an ARM based Mac, but I worry about the software incompatibility towards macOS based apps.
Not interested in running iOS apps on a laptop as the software is simply not up to par with macOS counterparts.
100% with you. Lots of conflicting arguments on this post as to how easy/hard it will be for devs to port their apps over to ARM too. No clue who to believe on this.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: Lone Deranger
Guys, is there really a point in waiting for the new 16” mbp in 2020? Will they have intel processors still? Tell me more 😩
 
What does RISC-V have to do with it? If Apple wants to customize their ARM-based instruction set, they are free to do it.
[automerge]1582573218[/automerge]

No, also in my house. My little girl is very argumentative. I get no respect :cool:

the customization means that eventhe competition will be able to compete on the bigger scale. I was not referí Nd to Apple in this regard fyi
 
Nobody here sees the obvious? Apple is going to a cloud computing business model and access to the great CPU in the sky will require an ARM device and a subscription. You can run any software you like on VMs for Mac OS, Windows, Linux, etc.
There's nothing stopping Intel devices from accessing cloud services.

The new ARM-based devices are clients that would access Apple’s cloud mega-CPU and VMs. Services available by subscription only. Bring any software you already own/license and add it to your VMs. All arguments about CPUs, OSes, etc. are moot. Pay to play.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.