Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
If they put an IR sensor back on it, I think I would sell my current one and upgrade. Without it though, I don't need any extra processing power at all. The Flash Drive is more than enough.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)

Day 1 purchase for me! Hope this is true! Please also offer 512 gigs of hard drive.
 
a while after it's been out for desktops and laptops on the other side. A shame Mac users have to wait a year for a refresh which will be old by the time it hits the shelves. Oh well.. the price you pay for being a Mac fan.

- typed this on my new sandy bridge quad core... have a nice day-
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPod; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)

I think next generation MacBook air will get 2.1 Ghz core i5 sandybridge processor with 4gb ram , may be 512gb SSD . Don't expect to see any design change .if Steve really had taken my email serious he would make keyboard in the MBA backlit
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPod; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)

if Steve really had taken my email serious he would make keyboard in the MBA backlit

lol, all hail to the mighty one, :p
 
Good. Get away from those Core 2 Duos. Completely ridiculous using those chips and charging that price.

It's an ULTRA-PORTABLE!!! What do you expect? Dual-dual-core Xeons?! Seriously, the combination of ultra-mobile Core 2 Duo (which, mind you, isn't the same CPU we see in the white MacBook, 13" MacBook Pro or Mac mini) and the GeForce 320M should be more than fast enough for anything anyone could possibly use that machine with in 2011.

I wonder how this sky will fall.

Stupidity on forums, I'd guess.

Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)

Time to sell my 1.6 4GB 11" Air, man that was quick!

Because you heard on the Interwebs that Apple would be releasing the inevitable successor to your computer?!

Does anyone have an idea of what sort of impact this will have on battery life?

If the rumor is to be believed (and I'm honestly skeptical), battery life should be greatly improved.

Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/532.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0.5 Mobile/8B117 Safari/6531.22.7)

I'm most interested in seeing a DVD-less 15" MacBook Pro come to market with Sandy Bridge.

It doesnt have to be as thin as the MBA, but they can save lots of space and weight without that near worthless internal drive.

I doubt Apple will cater to the small minority of people on these forums (you included) who don't want an optical drive on their portables.

4 GB standard memory please.

This.

That totally sucks for those of us who took the initial leap.
Apple has a lot on their plate right now, seems unlikely to come out 6 months after the initial release of the product.

MacRumors is usually is on the cutting edge of hear say and innuendo, so I'm not going to get to upset at this point.

I agree that it's probably not likely, but I don't see why that's make you upset. You bought a computer you wanted at the earlier portion of a refresh cycle (good move on your part) and you (presumably) enjoy the hell out of it. What sucks about that?

Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPod; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)

I think next generation MacBook air will get 2.1 Ghz core i5 sandybridge processor with 4gb ram , may be 512gb SSD . Don't expect to see any design change .if Steve really had taken my email serious he would make keyboard in the MBA backlit

Keep dreaming. I also wouldn't go into fortune telling if I were you. ;)
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)

Get one you won't regret it. Even with c2d they're surprisingly quick and the high res makes up for the small screen.
 
Anyone have any ideas on whether we may see a 3G macbook air at any point? It seems logical to me, though i guess it could cannibalise iPad sales.

Thoughts?
 
For those people obsessed with backlit keyboard and matte display on the MBA, you should look for the Samsung Series 9; however, it has 1.4GHz i5, 4GB DDR3 and 128GB SSD for $1600.


Anyone have any ideas on whether we may see a 3G macbook air at any point? It seems logical to me, though i guess it could cannibalise iPad sales.

Thoughts?

It probably will not happend. Especially now with so many handsets where you can already browse the web and read email plus they offer tethering and personal hotspots there is no need to add another sim card with a plan for a low connection speed to your laptop.

There is no cannibalisation between laptops and ipads, unless you are buying something that won't exceed £500 just for casual browsing. Moreover the interaction with a tablet and other regular computers with keyboard are very different and, in my opinion, have different purposes.
 
Last edited:
If the MacBook Air switches to Intel Integrated Graphics, doesn't that mean nVidia CUDA code will fail to work? This tiff is a bit silly. What's keeping them from using ATI's mobile chipsets for Stream support?
 
2011 MBA

Release date: October 4 or 11, 2011

Specs and pricing:
All models with backlit keyboard.
Resolution identical to current models.
One of the 2 USB ports replaced with Lightpeak.
No IR

MBA 11" $999
i5-2537M 1.4 GHz
4 GB
128 GB SSD

MBA 11" $1199
i5-2617M 1.5 GHz (BTO i5-2657M 1.6 for $100)
4 GB
256 GB SSD

MBA 13" $1299
i5-2629M 2.1 GHz
4 GB
256 GB SSD

MBA 13" $1599
i5-2649M 2.3 GHz
4 GB (BTO 8 GB for $200)
512 GB SSD
 
Don't think this will happen...
Apple has backed OpenCL and OpenGL in their system, allowing the GPU to do a great part of the work in a modern OS and I've read that first generation Sandy Bridge GPUs are incompatible with OpenCL (only the CPU part is compatible completely missing the point ^^), which for a low performance CPU machine like the Airs is unacceptable.

This is one of the reasons Apple keeps C2D chips in the Airs combined with Nvidia GPUs, so the GPU can run all the animation and effects from Mac OS X, but also keeping their old machines ready for the technologies that they feel will be mandatory in future software, Grand Central Dispatch (last year WWDC Apple had session explaining why dev already should use it on their iOS apps) and OpenCL.
+1

Battery life would get better. One of the reasons that Intel's graphics has lagged in performance is that lower power was higher on the design priority list than many of the features that Nvidia/ATI-AMD added to their solutions. So Intel's solution was more competitive on perf/watt than on performance alone. When matched up on chip implementation tech generation versus the others they are as "hopelessly bad" as many folks around here characterize them. ( $/perf was also has been higher on the design priority list than Nvidia/ATI . )

The performance would be a backwards slide on higher end 3D graphics though. Back to the previous MBA (mid-2009 or worse ) era of graphics. That's way waiting till a better "two chip" solution appear later in the year would be a smarter design choice for the MBA. Churning the design "just because" is very misguided. Nor would it be too surprising to see Apple milk the current C2D/Nvidia solution for another 6+ months from its launch date until May-June 2012 if nothing this Summer/Fall is has better $/perf and perf/watt ratios.
+1

The next MBP 13" could easily have discrete graphics just like the other MBP brethren if they drop the DVD drive and replace it with discrete chip and an additional fan (just like the other models). If Apple is going to declare war on DVD/CDs ( flash memory based emergency boot and OS restore device, Mac App Store , etc.) then there should be internal volume in the MBP 13" for a discrete chip, VRAM, and additional cooling.

Additionally, a MBP 13" with a discrete GPU will further differentiate that model from the MBA 13". If need more graphics performance.... buy the MBP 13". Similar to how MBP 13" differentiated from the MB 13".


In the MBA there is not because they chose to minimize volume. So there is no space to "recover" to add multiple new components.
+1

Quite good for:
Web browsing
Office
Software development

Very bad for:
Photoshop
Games
Video editing (if it uses the GPU)

The new MBA will be very good for light computing, but bad for anything that requires a large monitor.
 
about time. the air processor has been way behind.

...because it's an ultraportable. Duh! It's not like the version of the Core 2 Duo and the GeForce 320M are as substantial as their normal laptop-sized counterparts. Why do you think the previous MacBook Air's GeForce 9400M lag behind the versions found in the white MacBook, the Aluminum MacBook, the Mac mini, the iMac, or the 13" MacBook Pro? Hint: It's because it wasn't the exact same chip, it was a smaller one meant for the thermal envelope of an ultra-portable because the MacBook Air is, you guessed it, an ultra-portable! I don't understand how some people don't get this.

8GB RAM standard.

Please.


Pretty Please.






With a cherry on top?

It won't happen until it's the new minimum. We still don't even have 4GB standard on it and that's really overdue.

Quite good for:
Web browsing
Office
Software development

Very bad for:
Photoshop
Games
Video editing (if it uses the GPU)

The new MBA will be very good for light computing, but bad for anything that requires a large monitor.

Wrong, you can definitely do all of those just fine on a 13" Pro, just not as well as you would on a 15", and you can definitely do it just fine on a 13" Air provided you aren't writing as much data to disk, which I suppose you'd do a lot of with video. Meh.
 
Quite good for:
Web browsing
Office
Software development

Very bad for:
Photoshop
Games
Video editing (if it uses the GPU)

The new MBA will be very good for light computing, but bad for anything that requires a large monitor.

MBA has more pixels than the 13" MBP. It also beats the MBP in various benchmarks
 
I'm always happy to play with new hardware and upgrading my current 11.6 ultimate wouldn't necessarily be bad, but I worry about the Intel graphics.

I actually do play a couple games on it. Mostly WoW and I think it plays pretty well. Not like my maxes out PC, but when I travel it's nice to be able to play.

As a computer guy, I've had a lot of experience with built-in Intel graphics and they work fine for biz stuff but absolutely suck at games.

So if they do update, I may actually have to wait for reviews instead of being on the cutting edge.

But one thing is for sure, updating the Air on a regular basis again is a great thing!
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.