Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The Macbook and Macbook Pro are becoming one line, the Macbook air will see an upgrade and price cut to fill the Macbook void, and new to the Apple family will be the Macbook Net/Ultrabook/whatever.

The portable line will be: Macbook Netbook, Macbook Air, Macbook (basically the old MBP).

I agree that the "Pro" distinction between the MB and the MBP should disappear. I can't imagine it making a difference to a consumer considering which product to buy - hopefully, that decision comes down to features. Honestly, I'd like something akin to 13 in Macbook Pro. Very durable and portable but a speed demon with lots of storage that I can set up in a multi-monitor configuration when I want serious display capabilities.

Frankly, after thinking about it for a while, I like the "portable line" list above in the quote. Nice differentials between the three different levels. Thumbs up!
 
The new MacBook can perhaps be considered as an "13-inch MacBook Pro". So, either add the "Pro" name to the MacBook or remove the "Pro" name once and for all eternity. :)
 
i'm sorry, what's wrong with Quicken (or QuickBooks)? there's a brand new version.

don't get MYOB... if you do in few years you;ll wish you has stuck with Intuit.

anyway, your reason or whatever reason you have (it wasn't given) is silly. ask anyone. ask Mac accountants.

How can you judge my reason as silly, especially if "it wasn't given"? I'm giving iBank another try, despite my misgivings, because I don't want to spend on Windows and a virtualization app too.

In truth, I want a Quicken for Mac that is equivalent to Quicken for Windows. To me, that would be a Brick thrown right through Windows. Instead, Intuit's Mac software is lame! Microsoft must have some compromising photos of the Intuit CEO from a convention in Vegas!

While I wish the Brick was software, I believe it to be a new Mac mini.
 
The new MacBook can perhaps be considered as an "13-inch MacBook Pro". So, either add the "Pro" name to the MacBook or remove the "Pro" name once and for all eternity. :)

Long has it has a dedicated GPU with some capable power.
 
I agree that the "Pro" distinction between the MB and the MBP should disappear. I can't imagine it making a difference to a consumer considering which product to buy - hopefully, that decision comes down to features. Honestly, I'd like something akin to 13 in Macbook Pro. Very durable and portable but a speed demon with lots of storage that I can set up in a multi-monitor configuration when I want serious display capabilities.

Frankly, after thinking about it for a while, I like the "portable line" list above in the quote. Nice differentials between the three different levels. Thumbs up!
A 13 inch MBP would be a great addition IMO!
 
What about something like this?...

bricks261.jpg


You could upgrade with ease to whatever level you like. Even build a powerful server like this...

10bricks336.jpg


..Or you could join your "brick(s)" up with your friends/colleagues "brick(s)" when you want to do some multi-CPU intensive stuff.

Dude, do me a big favor......

I want you to get back to your photoshop project file and alter this picture so that not only can you add modules one on top of each other.....but also from SIDE TO SIDE!
This way, if you want a Mac module for light computing....get one unit. If you want a more powerful professional setup to mimic the power of a pro tower....then get six or seven or even ten modules stacked on top of each other.

Furthermore, and if you have the budget, if you want to run a server farm or want to really number crunch your nobel prize winning theorem, then buy dozens of modules that stack on top of each other and from side to side! Gawd I'm brilliant! :D
For practical reasons it wouldn't make much sense to keep stacking units on top of each other till you reached the moon. :p

So this can easily be illustrated by you in photoshop I'm sure. Can you do that for us? Even more so (if you have the time) can you also design some smaller units that can also attach itself to the main modules like the jigsaw puzzle I suggested? The smaller modules can be specialized for memory or storage or even processing units. That way a customer can build an incredibly powerful and near infinitely customizable system if he/she had the budget and the need. Or, one can buy one simple module....or a few....for their modest computing needs.

Chew on this for a while then get cracking with the photoshoppin! :cool:
 
Furthermore, and if you have the budget, if you want to run server farm or want to really number crunch your nobel prize winning theorem then buy dozens of modules that stack on top of each other and from side to side!

So this can easily be illustrated by you in photoshop I'm sure. Can you do that for us? Even more so (if you have the time) can you also design some smaller units that can also attach itself to the main modules like the jigsaw puzzle I suggested? The smaller modules can be specialized for memory or storage or even processing units. That way a customer can build an incredibly powerful and near infinitely customizable system if he/she had the budget and the need. Or, one can buy one simple module....or a few....for their modest computing needs.

Darn - should have seen this potential connection earlier :)
My take is that something like this could very well be useful in the HPC market, with the view that Snow Leopard ushers in the capabilities to really use this sort of discrete buildable system -
So this is a punt, but the "brick" is an analogy for how you are able to build a system with multiple bricks. Snow Leopard is known to be pushing for multi-core, multi-processor improvements (Grand Central etc.). But why stop there? Why couldn't Snow Leopard Server edition do the same over both XServes, and also Mac clusters, be it Mac minis, Mac Pros etc.

One of the puzzles i've been chewing on is that Snow Leopard, by going 64-bit, will have huge maximum potential Hard drive, Memory, and CPU/core limitations. If you really wanted to crunch numbers, potentially, the improvements upcoming could really help. The "brick" could be as a rack mountable XServe style unit. Brick does connotate physical proximity, but could just mean being able to use them together easily to form a larger system.

The concept of being able to "hive mind" multiple macs easily, for computing power is an interesting concept. Whether it would take off is another thing, but Apple might be close to the forefront next year in bringing in improvements to both business and consumers from multi-core CPUs, and multi-processor units (e.g. 2 CPU socket XServes on Nehalem lets say).

As mentioned - an Xserve would need risers, to actually even contemplate putting in a small percentage of RAM that the system could take. If there was a way to bolt on Memory, HD, graphics cards (GPU for the SL) sub components - because if Apple did want to let people rip making their own mega systems, they'd need a way to add all this kit on. A normal mainboard wouldn't cut it.
 
The way I see it..

New Macs at a very cheap price point. Building the foundations (bricks) of the future of Apples which will in turn bring people who currently have a windows machine, thus smashing the windows domination with a brick. The cheap price also ties in with what ive read about SJ telling people to be prepared for aggressive pricing.

I for one would change and had I not decided to do some proper research, I would probably have already bought a Mac Mini so now im eagerly awaiting 14th Oct..
 
Speakers

Actually... maybe it is a replacement for the iPod Hi-Fi.

BrickWall.jpg
 
:) ...I was just sitting on the crapper (only word I can think of that's understood both sides of the Atlantic), thinking about stackable mac brickies.

First of all, I'm going to have to decline requests to add more to the photoshop file. Incase you couldn't tell, I really did nothing more than spend 5 minutes copy-and-pasting squished mac minis ...Oh and I also searched google for "apple marketing typeface" (myriad).

Besides, I really like the apple-like simplicity of the mock ad...

...I can imagine an "I'm a Mac" advert where Mac (standing next to a table holding a small mac mini) asks a flustered looking PC (surrounded by componants, Fans, screwdrivers, water-cooling valves, resevoir, huge cooling radiator, soldering set and a great big jet engine-style PC case, covered in speedometers) "Hey PC, what are you doing?". PC snorts at Mac's little mini and proudly replies that he's "upgrading" ..."I'm doubling the power of my system. I've added Sli GPUs, Dual CPUs, Dual DDR modules, Dual Raided HDDs, Dual..." ...PC is then left speechless as Mac returns from off screen with a second mini, that he quietly places on top of the first. "Me too" he says.
 
Oh yeah... My idea about the "brickies" was what if snow leopard added some "in-a-box" functionality? What I mean is, one mini could be a dedicated home server in-a-box, another could be a dedicated GPU in-a-box, another an audio digitizer in-a-box, another even a specified TV upscaler in-a-box. So many CPU intensive tasks could be offloaded to dedicated hardware. ...And ANY one or more bricks can take the role of this hardware, or could be manually dedicated to that chosen sole function.

Endless possibilities?
 
The Macbook and Macbook Pro are becoming one line, the Macbook air will see an upgrade and price cut to fill the Macbook void, and new to the Apple family will be the Macbook Net/Ultrabook/whatever.

The portable line will be: Macbook Netbook, Macbook Air, Macbook (basically the old MBP).
That's an interesting thought. I really like that. It shows where notebooks are heading.

You son of a...........I hate you! :mad: You stole my idea. :D
Mine too :p, except mine was about a type of docking station attached to the bottom of a notebook.

Very good dude. In fact, my idea is even more elaborate. Imagine being able to swap out or add modules of ram or storage, etc. like a jigsaw puzzle. But even with your design imagine if your editing something in final cut and the processing of some large movie is just moving along too slowly. Just add a few more modules ON THE FLY AS THE PROGRAM IS STILL RUNNING and watch as the project is finished way faster!

:p
The extension of my above idea was to wirelessly link up spherical modules to a central computer, then watch as the app copies parts of the movie to the modules, processes them there, and copies them back to the main computer. :D Or something like that. :p
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.