Another recycled rumour. No new content compared to what we already knew 3 months ago.
On theiMac side, performance will go up to around a 980m with the RX 490m or even higher if there is a 495m.
What about tim cooks pc replacement comment
“I think if you’re looking at a PC, why would you buy a PC anymore? No really, why would you buy one?”
Yes, the iPad Pro is a replacement for a notebook or a desktop for many, many people
. -Tim Cook
LOL @ laptop grade GPUs in a desktop. Why does NOBODY call out Apple for this crap?
Probably because a lot people use their iMac for iMessage/Safari/Photos/Facebook and don't need the extra GPU sucking power.LOL @ laptop grade GPUs in a desktop. Why does NOBODY call out Apple for this crap?
The USB-C is what worries me about this otherwise great MacBook Pro update. If it only has USB-C, no less than five standards (MagSafe, USB-A, HDMI, Mini DisplayPort/Thunderbolt 2, SD card slot) are being dropped all at once. Many people (myself included) who use these Macs aren't ready for that yet.
Seems Apple is starting to move all their devices to smaller footprints, hope they push that through the entire line of products.
So is there going to be a headphone jack?
(I kid, I kid!!!)
LOL @ laptop grade GPUs in a desktop. Why does NOBODY call out Apple for this crap?
That new, rumored, touch strip is interesting. I'm not sure how well I'd like it though.
"extraordinary VR experiences" from the new low-power architecture.
It MBP could support Oculus and Vive, I would definitely get one with the high-end graphics card. If not, I will take the cheapest version and save the money for a PS VR.
It would be a huge stretch to expect a MBP to support VR properly given the extremely high GTX 970 level power requirement for smooth 90fps.
I think the article is just stating for the sake of attention. 2018 MBP maybe, 2016 no way.
My 2012 rMBP that has problems to last longer than about two hours on battery tells a different story. Initially, the battery lasted more than six hours. Aside from the first 2006 MacBook Pro (which had problematic batteries that even were recalled), no other of my Apple laptops had such a decline in battery lifetime as this one.Removable battery! are we living in 2001? These are not dell laptops here. There are zero concerns with apple laptop battery life, in fact the whole laptop industry improved after apple started getting 12 hour battery life. They actually keep their performance rather well.
…and that's not even mentioning that such a touchscreen is an ergonomic nightmare.Using a touchscreen on an OS designed for a mouse and keyboard is a step backwards in usability, not forward.
Using a touchscreen on an OS designed for a mouse and keyboard is a step backwards in usability, not forward.
I am really happy Apple didn't cater to the users who like gimmicky features.
Well, the bar was really low the last 4 years, so that won't come as a surprise. Anything other than processor, GPU, RAM, disk size and battery upgrade, which, you know, has happened regularly the last 30 years, and the article will be correct.
Maybe we should all start writing for Bloomberg!
Which still raises the question: how does that differ from the standard F-keys.The question for me, assuming it's real, is does it provide a true benefit or it is just eye candy. I guess it depends on how customizable it is. If you can put any command and any icon on it then it's a big plus.
Looks like this design would be a bit of a pain for those of us Pro users who listen to music and do a lot of programming, since a lot of IDEs (like Android Studio) tend to use the Function keys. Looks like we'd now have to swap between two different displays for using the Function keys and controlling the volume. (Notwithstanding the fact that having to press something like Cmd-F4 when one of those keys is real and the other isn't will just be weird.)
It is better;
But that's Apple's whole philosophy now with their products; make something that is GREAT and is perfectly reliable and easy to use far more than the competition but then give it a major drawback but sell it at 3X the price. It just so happens that the drawback these days is the fact that it's disposable seeing how you can't upgrade / swap any of the internal components.
- DVD drive can be removed giving you an additional bay to insert a secondary drive (2tb max storage per drive)
- Battery can be removed and replaced with ease
- screen came with a matte finish option that didn't act as a mirror like the new glossy ones
- GPU and CPU are not all that far behind in performance even after 4 years (check geekbench)
- the parts inside aren't as disposable as the new one, you can remove/replace many of the components if need be
- And most importantly, the RAM modules can be upgraded, Crucial makes single 16gb dimms, so you can get up to 32gb of RAM whereas the current MacBooks are maxed out at 16gb thanks to the soldered RAM.
Apple's essentially spitting in the face of all of it's consumers but nobody seems to mind.