The 14.2" is actually thinner and lighter than your 2012 13", while the new 16.2" is thinner (smaller in every dimension actually) and lighter than the 2012 15". The "huge and heavy" backlash is a little overstated.It is funny how everyone is up in their arms about "port xy" and magsafe being back and I have been holding onto my retina MacBook Pro from 2012 for so long that it is literally just an upgrade for that MBP for me. I never experienced missing those ports.
And yes, the 16inch looks HUGE and heavy.
Except that you’re comparing older chips to a new one.How does it look for AMD and Intel, who's main gig is designing chips, to get strong-armed (see what I did there) by Apple doing chips as a side hustle?
I wouldn’t put to much weight on a single test score. There are a lot of variables about how a test executes and is measured. You want to look at multiple runs and multiple tests as well as real app measurements. The M1 and M1 Pro/Max probably have essentially the same cores.The single core comparison is interesting in favor of the Air. Is there a definitive list of "things that are always 100% single core no matter what?"
It's not blocking the screen...That notch is a bad design. PERIOD. Please stop encouraging anything which blocks the display.
The "huge and heavy" backlash is a little overstated.
What did you expect? That a brand new M1 chip is performing worse than a 4 year old chip from the iMac Pro? In some cases, it's performing on the same level. Or do you mean GPU? That's not really Intels business, it's Nvidia's and AMD is always falling short in the category. So the strong point for the M1 is providing a SoC with low power consumption. If one is after absolute compute power, something like a Razer Blade Studio with RTX 5000 is still running circles around these new M1 SoCs. For pure mobile application, these are great though. I'd still pick something like a MBA for mobile use and then rather use a eGPU or additional desktop system with more power while working in the office or at home.How does it look for AMD and Intel, who's main gig is designing chips, to get strong-armed (see what I did there) by Apple doing chips as a side hustle?
Touch Bar was great. Pseudotech-mafia “journalists” killed it.
Because you told me not to, I’m just going to encourage it even harder.That notch is a bad design. PERIOD. Please stop encouraging anything which blocks the display.
Microsoft’s new Surface Laptop Studio only has two USB-C/Thunderbolt 4 ports, a headphone jack and proprietary power connector. NO HDMI, no SD card. Limited ports does get mentioned in reviews but not the outrage we saw with MBPs.
Apple shouldn't even be in the same conversation with Intel, AMD, and Nvidia in terms of performance. The fact you're even comparing their mobile offering to a desktop sku is crazy. How long did it take AMD to catch Intel? How long did it take ATI/AMD to get in the realm of NVIDIA? and Apple shows up in one year and makes a solid statement of belonging...and chips aren't even their day job.What did you expect? That a brand new M1 chip is performing worse than a 4 year old chip from the iMac Pro? In some cases, it's performing on the same level. Or do you mean GPU? That's not really Intels business, it's Nvidia's and AMD is always falling short in the category. So the strong point for the M1 is providing a SoC with low power consumption. If one is after absolute compute power, something like a Razer Blade Studio with RTX 5000 is still running circles around these new M1 SoCs. For pure mobile application, these are great though. I'd still pick something like a MBA for mobile use and then rather use a eGPU or additional desktop system with more power while working in the office or at home.
How thick is the iPad vs the thickness of the laptop lid to package the camera components?Maybe people expect more from Apple?
And this is an Apple-focused forum. Perhaps there's some outrage in something called SurfaceRumors.com or equivalent, filled with passionate Microsoft-is-always-right and Microsoft-is-always-wrong people?
Else, how come <competitor> gets away with it redirection is never effective rationalization. Again, see first point. We Apple people expect the most from Apple. There is so much "most" in these new MBpros, it practically blows our collective minds (the minds of both extremist camps here and those who are towards the middle).
And then there's the notch and this perception of "thick" despite looking at the hard numbers.
Step back a bit. Imagine a MBpro sans notch by putting the iPad Mini's 1080p FaceTime camera in an iPad Mini sized bezel... and shifting the whole screen (including the "extra" we get with notch) DOWN the few millimeters it would take to make that work.
That would deliver all of the incredible greatness of these MBpros minus the notch but still with the FaceTime camera upgrade... AND the "extra screen" being spun trying to rationalize the notch... AND the extra screen that is covered by the notch too. Menu bar doesn't have to thicken. Menus with many menus won't have to do whatever we're going to see they do when a menu item overlaps the notch.
Who is griping then? All that would be left is the "too thick" crowd which seems likely to come around once they get around to seeing them in person and facing the realities of numbers showing that that is mostly a visual illusion.
Who is griping then? Seems we would be hearing crickets.
I did. And it was a WONDERFUL review.Who would, in sane mind, watch that crap?
the Notch serves to make the MBP recognizable.. it is a design choiceMaybe people expect more from Apple?
And this is an Apple-focused forum. Perhaps there's some outrage in something called SurfaceRumors.com or equivalent, filled with passionate Microsoft-is-always-right and Microsoft-is-always-wrong people?
Else, how come <competitor> gets away with it redirection is never effective rationalization. Again, see first point. We Apple people expect the most from Apple. There is so much "most" in these new MBpros, it practically blows our collective minds (the minds of both extremist camps here and those who are towards the middle).
And then there's the notch and this perception of "thick" despite looking at the hard numbers.
Step back a bit. Imagine a MBpro sans notch by putting the iPad Mini's 1080p FaceTime camera in an iPad Mini sized bezel... and shifting the whole screen (including the "extra" we get with notch) DOWN the few millimeters it would take to make that work.
That would deliver all of the incredible greatness of these MBpros minus the notch but still with the FaceTime camera upgrade... AND the "extra screen" being spun trying to rationalize the notch... AND the extra screen that is covered by the notch too. Menu bar doesn't have to thicken. Menu bars with many menus won't have to do whatever we're going to see they do when a menu bumps into the notch.
Who is griping then? All that would be left is the "too thick" crowd which seems likely to come around once they can see them in person and face the realities of numbers showing that that is mostly a visual illusion.
Who is griping then? Seems we would be hearing crickets... or the cha-ching of Apple cash registers ringing even faster than they are now.
It's crushing everything based on what, "leaked" benchmarks? Let's talk when it's actually released and tested properly...Except that you’re comparing older chips to a new one.
Alder Lake mobile is already benchmarked as beating the M1 Pro/Max.
Desktop Alder Lake is absolutely crushing everything out there. 30% faster single core than Ryzen 5000.
You’re also comparing chips with absolute freedom of use (any OS, any task), vs chips that are heavily locked down and purpose built. ASICS are always going to perform better at the tasks they were designed specifically for.