Nobody expecting it from PRO machines.So.. not the 20+ hours everyone was expecting with this revolution in efficiency. Still in the same teens as everyone else.
Nobody expecting it from PRO machines.So.. not the 20+ hours everyone was expecting with this revolution in efficiency. Still in the same teens as everyone else.
14" Max is 97 vs Air M1 which is 170 for iZotope - the 14" Max is almost twice as fast... so not sure what you mean.It's kind of disturbing that the M1 MacBook Air is besting the maxed out 14" MBP on many tasks including iZotope Denoise! What's up with that?
Inferior battery life compared to the 13.After seeing the base 14" on iJustine ?. I'm sold on the base model...
Well, Apple never made a iMac Pro with laptop chips. You have to go to Lenovo or Dell and run the benchmarks again.I was talking about the comparison to the iMac Pro.
Of course no one is doing it, as there's no point doing it unless you want a locked down eco-system, which is exactly what Apple wants. They don't sell their hardware to anyone else and they don't want their software to run on any other system.Making a chip for a cell phone good enough to be used in a laptop, let alone be beastly in a laptop is a monumental feat. No one but Apple is doing that.
and superior in everything elseInferior battery life compared to the 13.
I did not find it so bad. At least she shows the new laptops a lot, which is quite useful. I have seen some video reviews which focus on the reviewer and show only a little of the products. Why do a video if not to show how the real thing looks like?iJustine got the base model and they do some 8k video editing on it.
@ 11.30ish
Yes it's painful to watch her.
I carry a 100w PD Power bank with me for all my devices now. So no worries here. Thanks for the reminder though.Inferior battery life compared to the 13.
She's one of youtube's most important social media influencers. She is the gold standard for reviewing new Macs.iJustine is the worst and most annoying reviewer!
It's designed and optimized for YouTubers, photographers and musicians.Designed for Geekbench enthusiasts. You can't play recent AAA games on it though!
And to the M1 Max having twice the memory bandwidth of the M1 Pro.Both the 14-inch and 16-inch MacBook Pro can be configured with either the M1 Pro or M1 Max, with both chips featuring a 10-core CPU. The difference between the chips comes down to graphics, with the M1 Pro available with up to a 16-core GPU and the M1 Max available with up to a 32-core GPU.
Anyone else notice that NONE of these early review(er)s got a base 14" model with the M1 Pro 8c/14gpu????
I'm suspicious...
Not much of a choice. You want powerful? Sacrifice portability. Wan't portability, get 1-year old or older tech.
Can still play using Geforce Now especially on a RTX 3080 node. Really it's just the matter of choice.Designed for Geekbench enthusiasts. You can't play recent AAA games on it though!
You can use logic to come to assumptions.In the spirit of your earlier post:
It's literally a CPU with less cores. EVERY CPU manufacturer does this between their smaller and bigger models (apple included).
What makes you think the 8 core and 10 core have the same performance?
No review needed. Just pure common sense and logic.
?
Jokes apart - of course the early reviewers will have been told by Apple to not compare the 8C with the 10C. Or the 14" vs the 16". Just wait for the detailed comparisons in two weeks time. If you cannot wait then have a look at https://www.anandtech.com/show/17024/apple-m1-max-performance-review/5. Andrei tested using SPEC and found the M1 Max on SPEC2017-Rate did 53.8/81.07 in a 8P+2E config and 48.57/75.67 in the 8P+0E config. Keeping things linear, the 6C+2E model should get ~ 41 for SPECInt which means a 22% difference in performance terms when it comes to multi-threaded tasks. For single threaded tasks, the graphs on https://www.anandtech.com/show/17024/apple-m1-max-performance-review/4 show that there won't be much difference between the 8C and the 10C CPU. All this assumes the 8C CPU is actually 6P and 2E cores
IMO, the bigger issue is that it wasn't implemented optimally.I enjoyed it because I could set specific 'buttons' on it for specific apps, beginning with Finder, and that would save me trackpad clicks. After a short while, everything became muscle memory. I would have New File/Folder, Delete, Duplicate buttons for Finder and for Transmit, especially. I would have some settings for Pages and Word, too, I think. Ulysses as well, if memory serves. I used it in other apps as well, but do not remember particulars of my use now. It was a great addition to my workflow, because I was not a developer needing the tactile feedback of function keys. Also, I just tend to adapt quickly and well.
It was great for what it was - a dynamic panel that could be customised for your requirements. And I did just that.
In fact, I started using the top bar (Touch Bar) more than I ever did the top bar (function bar) on my older MacBook Pro due to customisations available to me. I can see how a lot of people went bonkers about it, but for a lot of others, it was a nice addition.
Problem is that the ones who hated it tend to look down upon the ones who liked it, and do that contemptuously as if they are lesser humans to appreciate that Touch Bar for their uses. That is a problem. It points to the basic, banal human tendency that we just can't seem to culture ourselves out of.
I’m really not doing that. I’m not some Apple fanboy forgiving Apple for anything they do. Would I rather there be no notch? Oh, goodness, yes! However, in the big scheme of things, it seems like a relatively small thing in practice.People are contorting themselves into acceptance. It can be "ignored". It's not "that bad". I heard similar for the butterfly keyboard and touch bar.
The notch aesthetics are undeniably bad and for all the talk of extra screen space, it is essentially a dead area in what most people consider the display. It changes software behavior and it looks goofy, even if you can eventually learn to ignore it.
If Apple had stuck with a slightly thicker bezel and no notch, the view of the new MBP would be almost universally positive. They are addicted to throwing some controversial oddity into every design.
Cause he’s testing it with a “Windows” app that’s designed around Nividia cards. Wait until reviews start testing it with Resolve which is runs great on Windows and Macs.Dave2D said it’s like a NVIDIA 3060 that’s bad for that price and specs it’s not even a 3080 like they said
IMO, the bigger issue is that it wasn't implemented optimally.
The stuff the Verge covers today is mind boggling. I use to like them when they were a tech site.The Verge annoys me more than any other “tech” site. If they aren’t all up into politics, they are writing (badly) about movies and pop culture. However, when they do cover tech, they usually do a great job. Dieter Bohn has become my go-to reviewer for a lot of Apple stuff. But this “review” was annoying. There is no reason they couldn’t give us something more. It just seems like they were busy last week and decided, “eh, we’ll get to it eventually”.
She is only successful due to her looks. Sorry to say. Her reviews are annoying and so shallow. I don't get her popularity after the initial feast for your eyes. loliJustine is the worst and most annoying reviewer!