Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
RTFA yourself. People are complaining they didn't get the "10 hours" of battery life Apple Promised them. Apple didn't promise them 10 hours doing whatever they want. .. nor did they promise "10 hours of doing the same thing your old machine did". They promised 10 hours of battery life under the conditions of use they advertised which did not include using Chrome which sucks... or driving a external displaying.... while on Battery (seriously why would anybody even need to do that anyway?

The one example of long battery life was someone who had 92% left and is referencing the estimated life. I'm sure we've all seen the rosy estimates on our devices only to have the battery life decline in a non-linear fashion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Demo Kit
I'm so glad I don't need to upgrade my MBP.
This version of MBP is not only a limited,compromised machine but also plagued with bugs and problems.
I hope Apple learns from this failure and make the next version of MBP a good product.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Demo Kit
Before the battery died (spilled coffee on the thing) in my 2013 13" rMBP I routinely got 10-13 hours out of the battery. It worked as advertised.

I'd consider replacing the battery, but I wonder if it's worth it now, since I think Apple will obsolete it in 2 years.

(Anyone know if that's a stupid worry or not?)

Wow , that's great! I never got more that 5 hrs on a similar vintage 15" rMBP.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RMD68
No.

Why would I use safari? They said 10 hours of wireless web browsing, not 10 hours of wireless web browsing only if you use safari.

It is beyond obvious safari does not have all the plugins I need to browse the internet. Can I only expect apple hardware to work properly if I exclusively use Apple software?

Same goes for Final Cut. Using premiere with the exact same workload is choppy, and yet for Final Cut it's buttery smooth. See here:

Why doesn't apple fixate itself less on its anorexia and more in actually bringing the computers to appropriate specs that can run all software properly and not only Apple's? God damn, shave another gram from the computer at cost of functionality and I don't understand how people keep falling for this crap.
Apple doesn't test every single third party application to check if it meets their battery life expectations. Even if they did, they are in no position to tell the developer(s) of that app (Especially Google for that matter) that their App is a resource hog.
Same goes for other PCs. Have you tried iTunes on Windows 10? It's terrible in terms of battery life and performance but that's not Microsoft's or the Manufacturer's problem.
 
Thank goodness it's only a "subset" of users and merely "claims." Macrumors is turning in Mac-mouthpeice.
 
What a fiasco. Glad I returned mine and got a SP4.

That emoji bar is adorable. Touch/pen is far superior, the end. Apple is wrong here.

I wish I could do the same but mine is a 15-inch BTO and it's likely already inbound. Sadly, this is the first Mac purchase since many of you were born that I'm regretting before it even arrives.:confused:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Demo Kit
You can more easily just buy an external battery. Small thin and easy to carry. What's the point of swapping them in and out of your computer. Plus external battery gives you lots of charging options. But an external battery is good solution to a problem that shouldn't exist.

I did that once. It lasted about a year and a half before one of the cells failed and it started providing only a few minutes of battery life on a charge. And the battery pack was glued to the interior of the case in a way that made it completely unserviceable. And in that year and a half, I went through three or four power cords because they provided crappy first-generation MacBook Air MagSafe cords.

Not to mention that being tethered to a five-pound external brick isn't much better than being tethered to an outlet.
 
I wish I could do the same but mine is a 15-inch BTO and it's likely already inbound. Sadly, this is my first Mac purchase since many of you were born that I'm regretting before it even arrives.

You have till early January to return it under apples extended holiday return policy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: deany
Mine is giving out around 7 hours on a charge (with 10-12% remaining). Using Safari, Spotify, Slack, Word and Outlook, with 1h30 of a Ubuntu VM running on Parallels.

All this on around 50% brightness. So if it gives me 8 hours without using the VM it's fine by me, because it's all the time I spend out of the house working, and that way I don't need to take the charger with me.

Oh, btw, mine is the 15'' with the 2.7Ghz CPU and Radeon Pro 460.

PS: Running any VM or connecting a monitor will automaticly activate the Radeon, so for folks that are complaining about low battery life with monitors connected, there's your reason.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ImaxGuy
My bad... I didn't fully read the article. Those seeing short battery life are "claiming;" those reporting advertised life are "reporting." Heil Macbooks!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Demo Kit
I'm so glad I don't need to upgrade my MBP.
This version of MBP is not only a limited,comprised machine but also plagued with bugs and problems.
I hope Apple learns from this failure and make the next version of MBP a hood product.

I'm sort of feeling the same right now, which is a shame because I would've upgraded otherwise.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 544263
No.

Why would I use safari? They said 10 hours of wireless web browsing, not 10 hours of wireless web browsing only if you use safari.

Cool. By that logic, I'll program a lemon of an internet browser that maxes out the CPU and GPU just when idling. You'll get about 30 mins battery just keeping it running on the background. But sure, it's Apple's fault if I can't code/optimise for toffee. :rolleyes:

Yet you're not arguing the nMBP works fine with Safari. You're also not disputing that FCPX works smoother compared to Premiere, under the same workload. So most of your gripes come down to applications.

You're citing examples of software from Adobe and Google which are documented as being battery-hogging. Using this as proof that the MBP has poor battery life is ludicrous.

And finally, Apple say 'up to' 10 hours. Not guaranteed. If you're still unsatisfied, then let me assure you other OEMs are far more liberal with their estimates.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TMRJIJ
Apple hardware and software are closely knit and work efficiently, so their claimed battery life is probably right if you stick with that combination, else expect a hit. Reckon this will improve once third party software gets updated
but could be completely wrong!
 
What a fiasco. Glad I returned mine and got a SP4.

That emoji bar is adorable. Touch/pen is far superior, the end. Apple is wrong here.
SP4 is a total POS. We had 2 at work and they were not usable. Constant freezing up. Pure junk.
Love the people on here just trashing Apple. I have the 13 MBP TB and it works flawless. Battery life has not been an issue. There are so many factors to battery life and everyone knows that.
 
If only they didn't make the new one so thin, if only...

So much compromised. Battery life is the next thing down the tubes cause they went with a smaller battery.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 544263
LOL my late 2008 MBP can run up to 3 hours. Glad my trusty old MBP can keep up with the new one.

My retina 2012 MacBook Pro can still easily get about 4-5 hours, and that's with it being plugged in 90 percent of the time since I use it as a desktop mainly
 
personally I have never seen anyone use an external display while on battery power with a laptop.

Anyone know if this is a software or hardware issue? I personally never take manufacture claims at face value. Did anyone here ask "10 hours of doing what?" before buying their MBP?
 
No wonder. They cut the battery size by roughly 25-30% depending on the model you get. I know they say the processor uses less power but I doubt it's that much less plus you have a touch bar that draws power which they didn't have before and the screen is a lot brighter so that is probably drawing more power. With the issues they are having it's seriously making me wonder if they actually did any in-house testing of the laptops once they had the finished product.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MegaSai and Xi Xone
So just to sum up the new MacBook Pro:

- it doesn't connect to any devices easily (anything that is ahead of its time is not easily talk backward with older tech)
-it costs £400 more than previous versions (it wasn't meant as a bargained product, get over it. There're plenty bargained product out there)
-the Speakers explode (free replacement. small amount of defective products, not majority. This is not new for any product from any company)
-The graphics go crazy after 2 weeks (small amount of defective products, not majority. This is not new for any product from any company and free replacement as well)
-The battery life is nonsense. (Personal usage is different. You just choose to listen to the whiners only)

Pros:
-emojis to express your disappointment. (Once again, showing your bias and ignorance of the touch bar and its potentials)
 
  • Like
Reactions: e1me5
I thought people were complaining about the lack of power. Now complaining about battery life...
MacBook Pro 15 inch spec says 76 watt hour battery. CPU's TDP is 45 watt and Radeon pro consumes about the same energy. Do a math. The machine can potentially drain all power in less than an hour if fully used. 10 hour usage is a advertisement tem for consumers in genera.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.