So why didn’t you get a model where you could do that 🤷♂️Not allowing the lid to be open when prior macbook pro's could is the stupidest design decision. Also dropping ports on both sides and calling it pro is trash.
I am SO unhappy with the Macbook Pro M3 and if I didn't have to have it for work I would have waited. Can't wait to sell it and move on.
They already can when you pick the model with suitable graphics. 🤷♂️ Or just use a thunderbolt dock, nice to charge and connect just one cable. The iVanky is a great dock but others are available.Will the new MacBook Pro support what an Intel 2018 MacBook Pro can, namely run 2 daisy chains with 2 LG 4K monitors?
Ultra wide 5120x1440 displays have been supported on Macs for years.Does anyone know if the new MacBook Pros will support ultra wide displays like 5120x1440?
Exactly my LG is 5120x2160, my MBP M1 no problem. And also my daughters MBA M3 no problem. Simply one cable connection via USBC. Great monitor for productivity.Ultra wide 5120x1440 displays have been supported on Macs for years.
So HDMI isn't supported for ultra wide but using USB-C works just fine?Exactly my LG is 5120x2160, my MBP M1 no problem. And also my daughters MBA M3 no problem. Simply one cable connection via USBC. Great monitor for productivity.
No idea about HDMI. That is for TV and home cinema. Not great for computers. The USBC or Thunderbolt connection is much better as it allows for higher refresh rates and charges the laptop at the same time. Also no need to use dongles on a MacBook Air.So HDMI isn't supported for ultra wide but using USB-C works just fine?
Then you turn on optimized battery charging so it stays around 80% of charge most of the time and doesn’t stress the battery.Isn't it a bad idea to connect a laptop 2 external monitors and use it as a desktop machine always plugged in? Surely the battery will act up and in this use case a desktop machine like Mac Studio is a better option.
Apple's existing M3 14-inch MacBook Pro comes with two Thunderbolt 3 USB-C ports, not three Thunderbolt 4 ports like the 14-inch and 16-inch MacBook Pro models powered by M3 Pro and M3 Max chips.
Apart from fewer USB-C ports, the lack of Thunderbolt 4 support on the 14-inch MacBook Pro with the base M3 chip means it only supports one display with up to 6K resolution at 60Hz (or one display with up to 4K resolution at 120Hz over HDMI) when the lid is open. Currently the only way to support to two external displays simultaneously is with the lid closed, based on the resolution (up to 6K) and refresh rate (up to 60Hz) of each external display.
Interesting that you get so many thumbs down from an obvious, simple, factual statement... but yeah, for some Apple has never and can never do any wrong.Finally. My wife’s Intel MacBook Air from early 2020 can support 2 external 4k monitors and its own.
Its not really acceptable that it has taken until q4 2024 for Arm based Mac’s to catch up 🫤
Perhaps it has something to do with that the ARM Macbook Pro's always were able to do that, but, just like with intel boards, only if you actually order one with a chipset that can do thatInteresting that you get so many thumbs down from an obvious, simple, factual statement... but yeah, for some Apple has never and can never do any wrong.
You're right that the physical issue is in the number of display controllers, but the Thunderbolt stuff is an important clue - support for dual displays via TB/USB-C is required for the ports to be specified as "Thunderbolt 4" rather than "Thunderbolt 3/USB4" as on current base-M1/2/3 laptops.I don’t think all this talk about Thunderbolt is relevant.
True. But we know from Apple that the M4 has a "new display engine" - and the display support on the M1/M2 has come in for criticism - so it is quite feasible that it does now have three controllers.For the M4 to support all three displays, it would either need a third display controller, or for this architecture to change significantly.
This is one of those "you're probably right but it's not proven yet" arguments.If they didn’t get 2 displays in clamshell mode certified as TB4 for M3, they wouldn’t get that for M4 either.
True. But we know from Apple that the M4 has a "new display engine" - and the display support on the M1/M2 has come in for criticism - so it is quite feasible that it does now have three controllers.
Even if these leaks are faked (very easy, these days), the claims made are all highly plausible.
However, ISTR that the M3 MacBook Pro launched without dual displays-in-clamshell enabled and the feature only came along in a later OS update
Indeed, but not Airs... basically downgrading features to drive you to a Pro... thing is the modern Apple artificially constrains functional capabilities in the service of larger margins and at the cost of user experience than they did in the past... before they put more of a premium on the user (you can see it in several areas, and a complaint even from inside Apple long timers)... sure AAPL shareholders are thrilled, but this trend can eventually burn your butt (maybe have forgotten or did not experience the 90s Apple... it was grim... of now of course they have a galactic amount of cash that will let them continue down a potentially bad path for decades... it's why I'd say as someone who's been a Apple fan since the 1st West Coast Computer Faire and bleeding in 6 colors a healthy critical eye towards Apple is being a true fanboy.Perhaps it has something to do with that the ARM Macbook Pro's always were able to do that, but, just like with intel boards, only if you actually order one with a chipset that can do that![]()
Well, yes not an air with two dual screens and the internal screen. But the comments were made in context of the Pro and that is definitely possible. I've got to say my daughter has an M3 Macbook Air and it works brilliantly with my 5K LG screen and her internal screen through that single cable. But as I've got an iVanky dock as well, all the other screens work on her Air as well. All great. Ultimately it is an Air, great machines but for a purpose.Indeed, but not Airs... basically downgrading features to drive you to a Pro... thing is the modern Apple artificially constrains functional capabilities in the service of larger margins and at the cost of user experience than they did in the past... before they put more of a premium on the user (you can see it in several areas, and a complaint even from inside Apple long timers)... sure AAPL shareholders are thrilled, but this trend can eventually burn your butt (maybe have forgotten or did not experience the 90s Apple... it was grim... of now of course they have a galactic amount of cash that will let them continue down a potentially bad path for decades... it's why I'd say as someone who's been a Apple fan since the 1st West Coast Computer Faire and bleeding in 6 colors a healthy critical eye towards Apple is being a true fanboy.
The "crossbar" - assuming it is part of the SoC - must have been there at least since the M2 because the M2 Mini can support two displays over Thunderbolt - and its ports are billed as TB4.Yes. The Air immediately had it; the Pro got it in a later firmware update (which shipped as part of the OS). Which suggests that all M3s ship with a suitable crossbar.
The "crossbar" - assuming it is part of the SoC - must have been there at least since the M2 because the M2 Mini can support two displays over Thunderbolt - and its ports are billed as TB4.
it's clear that what the SoC can technically do and what MacOS actually allows are two different things, so who knows?
Then you turn on optimized battery charging so it stays around 80% of charge most of the time and doesn’t stress the battery.
Not at all. I used it at home plugged in with the external monitor or dock which powers the laptop. And use it in the office with a dock that powers the laptop. It’s a none issue.are you sure this does not affect the battery? i have a feeling that those lithium-ions will deteriorate faster when they are constantly connected to a power source. So after 1 year of 70% of the time being plugged in they won't last as long.
Plus, does it cause extra heat?
For someone who upgrades like once every 3 years. its people who plan to keep it for longer periods.
are you sure this does not affect the battery? i have a feeling that those lithium-ions will deteriorate faster when they are constantly connected to a power source. So after 1 year of 70% of the time being plugged in they won't last as long.
Plus, does it cause extra heat?
For someone who upgrades like once every 3 years. its people who plan to keep it for longer periods.