Gatezone said:
Didn't you just post the answer to this? I can well understand not wanting to believe some of this stuff. Nothing worse than having the money but not wanting to spend it on the available product.
That doesn't answer the question. There are plenty of apps that don't list machines as supported but still work fine. I'd like to hear a report from someone who has actually tried running the app.
Leemo said:
Erm, it's more graphics intensive than WoW or other games that have been discussed on here. It requires a good graphics card.
Has anyone tried Sims 2 on one of these? It IS a graphically intensive game. Is it playable? Can you turn down the settings?
ManchesterTrix said:
It won't run Motion and FCP isn't supported.
What's your source on Motion? What happens when you try to run it? I know FCP isn't supported, but I don't care as long as it runs (and it does).
Gatezone said:
Problem is not solved. Problem is repositioned and a state of denial is established. One could ask why the true believers keep wearing their panties over their eyes
What I could care less about was the yellow nissan and the other exploitive coolness taxes on other products.
WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? You insist that you don't care about the color pricing. And yet you insist it's still a problem? Make up your mind. Denial? True believers? Do you really have anything to say about this machine, or are you going to sit in your little sandbox and call people names?
The black is more expensive. If you don't like that, DON'T BUY THE BLACK.
No denial there. No "true believing". Seriously, what's so horrible about the notion of simply not taking advantage of the ***option*** of paying more for a different color? You still haven't given a reason for why it causes you to have such a hissy fit beyond It's Just Evil.
As for the weight, my response is simple. Show me a PC laptop with these features, at this price point, that weighs less. Until then, you're just wasting time with your mindless trolling (such as the rest of your post, which is too nonsensical to even bother responding to).
Gatezone said:
Uh oh... does this mean dick is right?

Oops, Netdog has a balanced and reasoned answer that supercedes the screen shots.
Wow, you're not letting your bias show or anything. Actually, if you read the posts, netdog doesn't really describe how the program runs, or say what problems he's having with performance. His post basically runs through a list of specs, which seems odd to me considering some of the specs he considers inadequate are the same as the MP pro, which has beaten dual G5's in some FCS benchmarks.
Netdog, I'd appreciate some specific details on what you are seeing in terms of performance. As well as any other reports on these apps from other users.