Gatezone said:
And straight tapping to select would be a godsend.
Tapping left clicks. What more do you want?
Not lightweight. Nope, sorry, that one you need to come to grips with. But I'm happy to hear about the tensile strenth. The case feels good to me, but it doesn't seem to be where the weight is coming from.
The battery is no cloud, to be sure. 5.2 pounds, though, is definitely below the median for a notebook computer.
This is no surprise coming from a party line guy, and it not making sense to me won't surprise you

. They sell more hardware, they introduce their software because it will be the initial default. Where's the down side? People keep buying Mac's and running windows on it? Gee that would be terrible.
I'm not a party line guy. It's rather irksome that people make that conclusion just because this is an Apple forum...I've made hundreds of posts (literally) pointing out problems with Apple, just as I have supporting them.
The problem is that they can't become a Windows OEM. Yes, they would sell more units, but that's not the issue. They need to sell OS X in order to maintain distinction as a company, not just sneak it in under the radar. If market share shrinks of OS X, it poses a substantial financial threat to Apple. Without going into the long and boring details, it comes to this: market share of Apple is measured by OS X, not by the number of Macs...they can't improve their market share by selling Windows-running Macs.
A little dumb maybe but I don't see them losing money on the deal if they are not losing money selling their systems without it? It isn't as if I'm suggesting they sell Mac hardware **without** Mac OS.
It's not that direct. If people don't run OS X, Apple doesn't gain anything. As a boutique PC manufacturer only differing in design from other PC vendors, they're doomed as a company. Just look at the market. Not one PC manufacturer is profitable, aside from Dell, and they've recently admitted that they're missing their growth targets. Apple's the only one not breaking even or in the red, and it's because of OS X.
I'm not sure I'm following the threat of a double-negative above... Can you help me parse out that one again? If relevant.
Well, it's not a double negative, so maybe just read it until it make sense.
Well this might explain what you were saying. I probably agree, although if Mac OS ran as easily on Intel non-Apple boxes as Windows runs on Mac hardware and Dell OEM'ed it (as Michael Dell has suggested) I don't think it would really matter what the hackers did.
It wouldn't. But that's outside reality, as you admit.
I'm just suggesting that there is very little to lose and a lot to gain by pre-installing or providing it as a BTO option on new Macs.
An erroneous and dangerous assertion, and I'm not saying that because Apple is involved. It's happened with other companies in similar situations, and it's never worked for them, and they weren't tackling a 90% market share giant with their strategy.