It's too bad that my mid-2010 iMac—which still runs as well as the day I got it—will not be able to run Mojave. Fair, though; the thing is nearly eight years old.
For those whose devices will not run Mojave: do not fret; this is not the "end of the road" for your computers! Indeed, so long as Apple continues to support High Sierra (likely for two more years) your device ought not to be considered obsolete.
EDIT: and yes, while my iMac was indeed ~$2,500 back in 2010, the reality is that I have had no problems with it in eight years; absolutely none. That to me is worth the Apple price premium. I'll gladly buy another iMac a couple years down the line.
Me, I want that dark mode for finder, Safari and iTunes.This is sure to make some mad.
Unless you need the latest version of Safari, Xcode or any other Apple apps for work.Whew, my 2013 MacBook Pro sighed in relief.
For those with unsupported Macs, it’s not like your Macs suddenly stop working. In fact, Apple always support the latest and -1 releases of macOS. So your machines will still be running like they are today, nothing’s changed.
Yeah. My late 2011 13" MBP is upgraded with 16 GB of RAM, a core I7 processor, and an 512 GB SSD. It should be able to accommodate Mojave, and yet, it will not. it's too bad they go by model, and not capabilities.End of the road for my late 2011 13" MBP then. Sigh.
I know, right?Dropping support for seven year old macs? Outrage!
I just hope our MacBooks will still function in 2 years as today, were safari, Flickr.com and other websites still run the same speed and reliability.It’s fair to end suppport for my 8 year old Air. But why the hell not provide a fair replacement device?
I surely won’t spend more than a 1000€ for a 10 year old design a second time again. Also, the current MacBook with a 480p(!) FT camera and the butterfly keyboard are a rather ridiculous option if you consider the price point. For me the Back to the Mac campaign was a promise that Tim Cook actually never delivered.
Right there with ya, pal.End of the road for my late 2011 13" MBP then. Sigh.
Really? That’s common with tech products and consumer goods is it?This is a bit ridiculous. At the price of these machines, Apple should at least support them for 10 years.
Damn. End of the road for my 2011 iMac then. Then again, I can't even install High Sierra because the hard drive died and it won't allow me to install it on an external SSD (something about "invalid firmware" which can't be updated).
I also have a 2011 MacBook Air which would have made a great machine to install the beta on. Sigh.
Ah well... My 2011 MBP is officially old now and this makes me reconsider buying a Windows machine to replace it instead of a new Mac... If that's not planned obsolescence I don't know what it is. Longevity is one of the big advantages of owning a Mac but sadly it seems that they'd rather have a dark mode and a bunch of users forced to upgrade -> $$$.
Yeah. My late 2011 13" MBP is upgraded with 16 GB of RAM, a core I7 processor, and an 512 GB SSD. It should be able to accommodate Mojave, and yet, it will not. it's too bad they go by model, and not capabilities.
And you cannot afford even a 2012 Mac? Let’s be serious.Unless you need the latest version of Safari, Xcode or any other Apple apps for work.
Windows 10 requirements:Really? That’s common with tech products and consumer goods is it?
You still own great computer, just pretend Mojave never happenedDamn. End of the road for my 2011 iMac then. Then again, I can't even install High Sierra because the hard drive died and it won't allow me to install it on an external SSD (something about "invalid firmware" which can't be updated).
I also have a 2011 MacBook Air which would have made a great machine to install the beta on. Sigh.