iOS on Android devices please
That makes even less sense than macOS on non Apple hardware.
iOS on Android devices please
You can’t airplay to an ipad. Also you can’t use the pencil with an airplayed display.Call me ignorant, but what is the difference between this and Airplay?
The report claims Apple is also working on options that will allow windows to be easily snapped to one side of the screen.
Do you mean the discussion in April 2017 (two years ago)? If so, I don’t think Craig said that, at least not in so many words. In response to the idea of making a Surface Studio-like Mac—he and Phil did say drawing is better on the iPad and that Mac and iPad should stay separate. Craig then added that people should feel free to use both, and that Apple is focused on making them work well together. His added remark could have been a foreshadow to this rumored feature, but then it also could have just been a general statement that we also know to be true.Craig mentioned something like this during the April Mac Pro roundtable last year. At least being able to use your iPad as a Wacom-style device. This must be what he is talking about.
That is what I thinking. It was more of a "be nice" instead of "its' coming" but it got my attention.Do you mean the discussion in April 2017 (two years ago)? If so, I don’t think Craig said that, at least not in so many words. In response to the idea of making a Surface Studio-like Mac—he and Phil did say drawing is better on the iPad and that Mac and iPad should stay separate. Craig then added that people should feel free to use both, and that Apple is focused on making them work well together. His added remark could have been a foreshadow to this rumored feature, but then it also could have just been a general statement that we also know to be true.
I was thinking about buying a Wacom. This news might save me money. But honestly I don’t have confidence that Apple would deliver user experience at par with Wacom. Apple updates have been buggy recently.Yeah I was thinking about that too. Would be awesome to use the pencil for whiteboarding during video conferences. I actually bought a small wacom tablet only for that.
It’s puzzling why Apple has delayed this feature for so long. Anyway it’s welcomed. I hope there are more cross integrations in their pipeline.I remember giving feedback to Apple once telling them that we should be able to use our iPads a drawing tablet for Mac. Guess they finally listened![]()
Users with an iPad that supports Apple Pencil will be able to draw with the Pencil when the iPad is being used as an external display for the Mac, effectively "turning the iPad into a Wacom-like tablet," according to the report.
Harness the power of USB-C connection for ultra solid connection instead of flaky wireless.
Mini 2018 + iPad Pro 12 2018 looks good combo.
There are also indications (stroughton smith) that you’ll be able to combine with handoff-like functionality. In other words, when working with an app on the mac, send it to your iPad, and it can actually launch the ipad version of the app and populate it with the app state so you can keep working on your ipad without being anywhere near the mac. With marzipan, many ipad apps will be identical code to their mac versions, which will make this much easier for developers to support.
I am not criticizing this feature, but I am curious as to why it would be needed. Why not just either only own a laptop or only own an iPad? Isn't a given project easily done on either one?
Don't get me wrong: such a feature would facilitate the owning and using of two different computers; however, regardless, it's still simpler to own and operate one machine than to have two separate machines. Up until very recently, I daily-drove a 2009 Mac Pro and a 2012 rMBP. Now that I have temporarily set the Mac Pro aside and have been docking the MacBook Pro on a Tb display, I've enjoyed having my desktop at home be the same exact portable that I have with me while I am on-the-go. My workflow has been sped up quite a bit because I don't have to replicate on my desktop what I had done during the day on my laptop.
I feel as though, now, I could only vouch for using more than one machine if both machines were to share the exact same desktop as one another—all my preferences, files, etc. It would have to be completely seamless, as though I had cloned one drive to the other.
[doublepost=1555524648][/doublepost]This is pretty good! Split View's functionality is awful; I hope that these new features make 3rd-party window-management programs obsolete!
Eh? Sure, it would be ideal if we all could get by with one device, but people have a myriad of different needs, and one device can’t meet them all. For some maybe. For others it’s either impossible or possible but would be a significantly worse experience than having multiple devices that are designed to work together as seamlessly as possible.I am not criticizing this feature, but I am curious as to why it would be needed. Why not just either only own a laptop or only own an iPad? Isn't a given project easily done on either one?
Don't get me wrong: such a feature would facilitate the owning and using of two different computers; however, regardless, it's still simpler to own and operate one machine than to have two separate machines. Up until very recently, I daily-drove a 2009 Mac Pro and a 2012 rMBP. Now that I have temporarily set the Mac Pro aside and have been docking the MacBook Pro on a Tb display, I've enjoyed having my desktop at home be the same exact portable that I have with me while I am on-the-go. My workflow has been sped up quite a bit because I don't have to replicate on my desktop what I had done during the day on my laptop.
I feel as though, now, I could only vouch for using more than one machine if both machines were to share the exact same desktop as one another—all my preferences, files, etc. It would have to be completely seamless, as though I had cloned one drive to the other.
If this can be remoted while away from your home wifi network it would be solid. There would be less of a requirement to run macOS natively on iOS, other than possibly speed (unless it will be a non-issue).
Eh? Sure, it would be ideal if we all could get by with one device, but people have a myriad of different needs, and one device can’t meet them all. For some maybe. For others it’s either impossible or possible but would be a significantly worse experience than having multiple devices that are designed to work together as seamlessly as possible.
Well, what would be the reason for owning both an iPad and a MacBook Pro?
Again, there are a myriad of different reasons for different people, but the most basic reason is probably power vs portability. Some people need the power of a 15” MacBook Pro on one day (running heavy duty programs that don’t exist on ios, multiple monitors, time machine incremental backups, etc.), and the portability of an 11” iPad Pro the next day (lightweight device on the go, able to use while standing, writing notes, drawings, etc).Well, what would be the reason for owning both an iPad and a MacBook Pro?
There are also indications (stroughton smith) that you’ll be able to combine with handoff-like functionality. In other words, when working with an app on the mac, send it to your iPad, and it can actually launch the ipad version of the app and populate it with the app state so you can keep working on your ipad without being anywhere near the mac. With marzipan, many ipad apps will be identical code to their mac versions, which will make this much easier for developers to support.
Well, what would be the reason for owning both an iPad and a MacBook Pro?
I use Duet Display, but I use it with an iPad 2 that runs whatever old version of iOS, so assuming that wont work with this - but duet display has been great (and works on windows)
damn. hope this is true, have been dreaming of a native solution, tried Astropad, Duet, YamPad, and they are nice but neither takes advantage of the USB 3.1 GEN2 Speeds ...