M1 Macs appeared in the 29th October beta of Big Sur. They were announced 10th November.Does anyone know what kind of delay there usually is between a software clue like this and a hardware release?
I suspect second week of April for the new iMac.
M1 Macs appeared in the 29th October beta of Big Sur. They were announced 10th November.Does anyone know what kind of delay there usually is between a software clue like this and a hardware release?
Nope! As cool as that would be, event invites are traditionally sent 7-9 days in advance. All rumors are pointing to an April event, though.I might be missing something, but doesnt this sound a lot like there’ll be an Apple Event on Tuesday 30 March?
But it is weird that there are no rumors from supply chain that usually confirm new product on the way. It could show that production has not been far away or that they may stick with original design. As it was with Mac mini that nobody announced. Just my speculations.I doubt it because the 21.5" and 27" iMac designs are from 2012.
With the MacBook Air and Pro, it was expected and understandable because they're relatively new and had been incrementally updated with modern display components and keyboard designs.
It'll keep runningBut do you wait til the 2nd gen if no face recognition with the 1st gen .... I’ve got a 27” iMac first gen and it is still going strong! Now I’ve gone and said that ....![]()
I wonder if they will do the same form factor for this first Apple silicon iMac release, similar to the laptops, to have a faster release cycle and for lower cost market. Then have the redesign for the next release.
I have good faith the new iMac is gonna rock in performance much more than expected by most.I really hope they can do better though, twice as fast would just be equal to an Intel i9 9900X (2018) or a Ryzen 3800X (2019).
MBP 16" was found in Catalina Beta Oct 18 2019 and was introduced Nov 13.Does anyone know what kind of delay there usually is between a software clue like this and a hardware release?
Did you go from a 4k 24” to a 5k 27”. No, because there wasn’t a 4k.I would love a G4 style iMac with a configurable display, but don’t think that will happen unfortunately. Apple has had a 27” model for many years and I don’t see the future model shrinking. I had a 24” iMac, and later a 27”. The difference is brilliant. I wouldn’t want to go smaller again, and I expect that it true of many other owners.
Granted it was 15 years ago, but:Nope, they won't. The reason why the laptops etc. look the same is because the design team was busy designing the iMacs. You have to spread the work and not have nothing and then overload them.
So, this is exactly what Apple has done. Redesign iMac so the Mac Mini and MBP are still in the same factors and when the iMac is out the team is ready to tackle those.
They’ll remove the power cord, keyboard, and trackpad.I wonder if they will do the same form factor for this first Apple silicon iMac release, similar to the laptops, to have a faster release cycle and for lower cost market. Then have the redesign for the next release.
I still could see a rocket lake 27” iMac and M1X 24” model this year, with a new iMac design language for the M2 next year.Don’t count out a final iMac CPU-only update for the current model to Rocket Lake. Seems unlikely, but the PCH is already RL-compatible and it would a relatively minor swap out. Perhaps making the 5500XT the default GPU as well. Seems far fetched, but never say never.
Seriously?!The wait is killing me!
Hurry up Apple!!!
A 24" 4k display is a downgrade from both the 21.5" 4k display and 27" 5k display.Did you go from a 4k 24” to a 5k 27”. No, because there wasn’t a 4k.
A 4k 24” will seem “brilliant” when compared to a much more expensive 5k 27” for most AIO buyers. And that’s what Apple has to market to.
Right on! What do you think the price will be for the entry level? $3k?not that i can likely afford it, but i’d be interested in a high powered apple silicon 32”
32" !!I’d love a 30“ iMac that runs silent
A sensible Mac user. Upgrading the boot drive to SSD...although some do not seem to think that makes much of a difference! Did you have an external HD with it?We've got an early 2009 20" iMac that's still going strong on Catalina (upgrading the boot drive to SSD and maxing out the RAM made it useable). Despite its general web-surfing, chat and excel/word usability, it fails to run Webex so it now really is time to go for a new machine. Should be quite the upgrade coming from iMac 9,x to iMac 21,x. Also, this is the first time that I realized that the iMac numbers correspond with the year of their release - is this intentional? As an aside, does anyone know why all product codes have a comma and not a period? Is it a hold-over from Jobs' design-thinking?
True, a 23.5” 4k monitor is not quite 200 dpi, so is it “retina” anymore? The 21.5” is a non-standard 4k panel (higher rez) to reach 220dpi, but would Apple want the cost of a custom panel to reach 220dpi? 4450x2500 4.5k? It would allow full 4k editing with pallets and controls open, though they would be smaller pallets than a 5k display.A 24" 4k display is a downgrade from both the 21.5" 4k display and 27" 5k display.
I don't see how that's going to work.