Is it because it is connected with Firewire? In that case you could move the disk over to a USB enclosure.All my important files are on a mechanical Hard Drive I've used forever.
Is it because it is connected with Firewire? In that case you could move the disk over to a USB enclosure.All my important files are on a mechanical Hard Drive I've used forever.
My expectations are low since the battery is old and I don't plan to replace it - I only maintain the laptop for fun (no serious use cases). I won't be testing anything beyond the ability to login and capture an "About This Mac" screenshot until OCLP post-install patches are available for Tahoe.How is battery life?
It is my understanding that Tahoe does not support mechanical HD's. Sequoia does. Also Tahoe does not support vintage bluetooth Keyboards like the Apple A1016, which in my opinion is the most substantial bluetooth keyboard Apple made. However, I think, support actually left with Monterey. Doesn't make sense.Is it because it is connected with Firewire? In that case you could move the disk over to a USB enclosure.
Mechanical HDs work in Tahoe. "Fusion" drives (HDD+SSD combo) do not.It is my understanding that Tahoe does not support mechanical HD's. Sequoia does.
I have several "mechanical HD's" that works via USB on Tahoe.It is my understanding that Tahoe does not support mechanical HD's. Sequoia does. Also Tahoe does not support vintage bluetooth Keyboards like the Apple A1016, which in my opinion is the most substantial bluetooth keyboard Apple made. However, I think, support actually left with Monterey. Doesn't make sense.
Great news! Keeping my 2012 up to date is something I have been enjoying more than I thought I wouldMacs with very promising initial patches (not available to the public, tested only by the devs):
Mid 2012 MacBook Pro 15-inch
Which one? 9,1 or 10,1? Both?Great news! Keeping my 2012 up to date is something I have been enjoying more than I thought I wouldI even let someone borrow it last week to get their work accounts fixed while traveling.
Sorry, it is a 9,1. Love it as a piece of "old tech" that is fully loaded (2.7 GHz, matte screen, updated BT/Wifi, blu-ray player, 4TB 860 Pro), still okay to use despite being blown away in performance from newer models. The only problem I noticed, had it connected to a 34 inch ultrawide 3440x1440, and while the MBP could drive the display, the fans were ALWAYS on. It works much better just as a laptopWhich one? 9,1 or 10,1? Both?
That is my machine. Unfortunately this "very promising initial patch" announce was published in june, and nothing happened since.Sorry, it is a 9,1. Love it as a piece of "old tech" that is fully loaded (2.7 GHz, matte screen, updated BT/Wifi, blu-ray player, 4TB 860 Pro), still okay to use despite being blown away in performance from newer models. The only problem I noticed, had it connected to a 34 inch ultrawide 3440x1440, and while the MBP could drive the display, the fans were ALWAYS on. It works much better just as a laptop![]()
Because the devs aren't going to release anything until there's a final release, unless you're in the actual test farm. And as with every release of the patcher, they're not going to release it piecemeal. When they're confident they have a comprehensive list of computers supported, that's comprised of all the models they realistically hope to support, that's when we'll see a patcher.That is my machine. Unfortunately this "very promising initial patch" announce was published in june, and nothing happened since.
With each release of the final version, like 26.0 or now the upcoming 26.1 after the first RC version, it will take longer and longer until an OCLP version for macOS 26 is released. As I suspected from the beginning, it won't happen until next year, when they are sure they have a comprehensive list of supported computers that includes all the models they realistically want to support.Because the devs aren't going to release anything until there's a final release, unless you're in the actual test farm. And as with every release of the patcher, they're not going to release it piecemeal. When they're confident they have a comprehensive list of computers supported, that's comprised of all the models they realistically hope to support, that's when we'll see a patcher.
As has been mentioned elsewhere on this thread, the devs who have been doing the majority of the technical work on OCLP for the past couple of years are still active. There is no need to worry, support will be released when it is ready.I highly doubt that work is being done on a new position since the
most important man is already gone.
While we have faith in the Devs, hearing that is always reassuring.There is no need to worry
OTA: Over-the-air. A web-search like Google returns lots of explanations and examples."Easy update to Tahoe 26.1 RC via OTA."
Excuse my ignorance, but:
1. What is OTA?
2. How did you do that?
But do it patiently.wait for OCLP 3.0.0
Recently had a private exchange with one of the remaining devs. He mentioned that there is some good progress (especially cMP relevant) but until a first release of a (3.0.0 ?) OCLP for Tahoe still a lot of issues have to be solved.That is my machine. Unfortunately this "very promising initial patch" announce was published in june, and nothing happened since.
Progress has been shown earlier in this very thread too, me first by permission of Edu and later Edu themself.Recently had a private exchange with one of the remaining devs. He mentioned that there is some good progress (especially cMP relevant) but until a first release of a (3.0.0 ?) OCLP for Tahoe still a lot of issues have to be solved.
For me that´s a good sign and also a reminder to be patient...