Notice how 'bugs should be squashed' is said first (ritual acknowledgement), and then we immediately pivot to 'opinions are opinions', which quietly flattens functional regression into aesthetic preference so nothing specific has to be addressed.
It’s a very clean maneuver: agree in principle, dismiss in practice. Everything becomes equally valid, which sounds fair until you realize it makes evidence, reproducibility, screenshots, and workarounds irrelevant. That’s how you end up with a forum that’s excellent at tone-policing and mediocre at troubleshooting.
And with that, a discussion about whether a feature works gets downgraded into a discussion about feelings. It’s a neat way to sound reasonable while ensuring nothing gets discussed.
It’s a very clean maneuver: agree in principle, dismiss in practice. Everything becomes equally valid, which sounds fair until you realize it makes evidence, reproducibility, screenshots, and workarounds irrelevant. That’s how you end up with a forum that’s excellent at tone-policing and mediocre at troubleshooting.
And with that, a discussion about whether a feature works gets downgraded into a discussion about feelings. It’s a neat way to sound reasonable while ensuring nothing gets discussed.
Last edited by a moderator: