Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The rainbows aren’t because Cook is making a political statement, but because the “rainbow apple” was the logo from 1977-1999 and is still beloved inside the company and among Apple enthusiasts.

View attachment 2623985
While yes, that was the old logo, the rainbow with Apple has nothing to do with the Apple brand now; it's a gay pride movement these days, and Apple certainly doesn't hide that fact every time we get new rainbow watch bands or wallpaper forced onto my devices.
 
While yes, that was the old logo, the rainbow with Apple has nothing to do with the Apple brand now; it's a gay pride movement these days, and Apple certainly doesn't hide that fact every time we get new rainbow watch bands or wallpaper forced onto my devices.

Nothing to do with the Apple brand now? They have giant rainbow stage in the middle of the campus, and use in the promo material all the time. Apple also (currently) has an openly gay CEO.

I say if it doesn't physically hurt you, don't worry about it.
 
Tim also removed a lot of the little things that made Apple, well, Apple, and just made it another generic mega-corp that cares about only profit but not the actual experience the way Steve did.
I disagree with the above.
It was only due to the massive user revolt that they managed to bring MagSafe back,
So we are measuring how well the ceo did by every perceived misstep? Steve doesn’t really look too good if that’s the case.
so where was the revolt when skeuomorphism,
Good call to get rid of skeuomorphism.
the glowing logo, breathing light, and various other bits that got gutted when we needed it?
Things change, they always change. A glowing logo is not the heart and soul of Apple.
If we yell loud enough, eventually even a mega-corp has to listen.
Not sure who we is? Apple listens to its customers. Maybe not the vocal minority in MR, but the do listen.
However, I would prefer a Jobs-like CEO myself. Until then, I'll stick true to my Steve-approved Apple devices from years ago. The still 'just work'.
My Apple produced devices all work properly as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jz0309
  • iMac The Knife - Hip hip hooray! Cook ended up being the worst possible choice to succeed Steve Jobs as Apple's CEO - at least in terms of product design, user experience, and genuine innovation.
No innovation is a weird take when Tim Cook greenlit Apple Watch (now the #1 watch in the world), AirPods (basically created the modern earbud category), and turned Apple Silicon into a performance per watt monster that made Intel-era Macs look ancient. 🤦‍♂️
That's it? To be fair, the Apple Watch was in the tech pipeline at Apple while Jobs was still at Apple. Anyway, I could list all the remarkable innovations under Jobs, but I think we all know that list is far longer. Compared to the innovation under Jobs in the same 14 year period, it's not even close.
 
That's it? To be fair, the Apple Watch was in the tech pipeline at Apple while Jobs was still at Apple. Anyway, I could list all the remarkable innovations under Jobs, but I think we all know that list is far longer. Compared to the innovation under Jobs in the same 14 year period, it's not even close.

I think that has a lot more to do with where we are at in the trajectory of personal technology development than anything else
 
Wow, this is really rather Meta

An article talking about commenters who commented on other articles?

I do take issue with being flatly labeled a critic of Tim Cook.

He has done many things I very much like and many things I do not like.

It’s much more on a spectrum as opposed to the binary that is being laid out here.
Yes, and we are now commenting about comments....

Ive never really understood the hate for Tim. Hate? really?

Hes objectively done great things for the business of Apple - and profits are the literal bottom line and the company has more than thrived under him.

For people that bemoan innovation? Cook took over when the iPhone and iPad were on the rise. You cant argue that they havent continued to do well.
You also cant argue the Apple Watch hasn't been a huge success under Tim.
People seem to think that Tim is somehow responsible for the inevitable plateau of design and form. Until the fold appears theres been nowhere else to go with iPhones apart from power and cameras and thinness.... were people expecting Tim to oversee the first triangular shaped phone perhaps?

John will have his work cut out for him if some of the Tim moaners dont have more realistic expectations from a tech company thats there primarily to make a profit.
Like it or not, under John the iPhone will continue to be a rectangular slab.... hes not suddenly going to come out with holographic 3D displays that interface with your brain via neural links....
Technology will continue to iterate and occasionally innovate but Apple will always want to appeal to the masses.
John must be careful not to make things too expensive - the fold will probably be out of many peoples reach as has been well and truly proven with the Vision Pro. it doesnt matter how good something is even if the use case is rather thin ... if people cant afford it they wont buy it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: surferfb
You’d have to ask Apple; I would assume because it doesn’t fit with modern design tastes and just because a company supports a cause doesn’t mean they need to change their logo to reflect their support.

The original logo was a rainbow to differentiate Apple from companies making business PCs and to highlight that the Apple II could display colors unlike most (all?) other PCs of the time. Neither of which is needed today.
Maybe my memories of the Apple II were different from yours, but the II, //e and IIc were monochrome out of the box. I don't remember seeing colour until they put a daughter card in and attached a Color II monitor to the //e. It was more common to see colour from a IIGS (which was a very high tech looking machine compared to the more 1970s-looking II and //e.) I remember being blown away by the IIGS.

Which brings me to another point that I miss about Steve running Apple. He ENCOURAGED you to take them apart. In fact, he put great effort (and busted a lot of heads!) to ensure that when you saw the inside of the machine, it was PERFECT. He was anal about that type of thing. Today? We got soldered-in RAM for no reason. Machine gets bad corrupt RAM? Toss it in the bin and buy another! Gee, that's being environmentally responsible, Apple, or should I say, Tim.

I will NEVER understand the idea of soldered on RAM (or glued in batteries) except for the intention of making a machine disposable. That's not a great way to promote reduce, reuse, recycle folks.
 
Last edited:
All y’all who think this multi-trillion dollar juggernaut is totally controlled by one man. 🤣

I guarantee you with the next misstep or whatever, we’ll see a wealth of absurd takes about how Ternus is "ruining Apple”.
Agreed. As if the MR commentariat could do better. Same thing applies to pro athletes, etc..
 
  • Like
Reactions: ignatius345
Wow... talk about being put in the spotlight and categorized. MR posters, pls note moving forward that your comments are being scanned and beamed up by the administration for large scale exposure. It's 1984 all over again..... we're being watched!!
 
  • Haha
Reactions: RMMediccc
Bowblax is a drama YouTuber whose videos entirely comprise of him reading random tweets and Reddit comments of people reacting to a specific event

Basically imagine this article but read by someone with a mild speech impediment and the habit of reading “lmaoooo” as “laughing my *** ooooooff”
 
Tim Cook was always a logistics person, he got the materials needed for production where they needed to go, and when he assumed the position of CEO he managed the sprawling Apple Empire to unprecedented levels of value which was both good and bad. Good because it put Apple on the firmest footing it ever had as a company, bad because he didn't understand how awful a lot of the things he signed off on were. Tim's biggest failure is without a doubt Mac OS X 26 Tahoe which is plagued with issues and should never have been foisted on us. Bad as well because Apple has gotten so big and powerful that they just shrug off disasters like Tahoe and keep on going.
 
Maybe my memories of the Apple II were different from yours, but the II, //e and IIc were monochrome out of the box. I don't remember seeing colour until they put a daughter card in and attached a Color II monitor to the //e. It was more common to see colour from a IIGS (which was a very high tech looking machine compared to the more 1970s-looking II and //e.) I remember being blown away by the IIGS.

You may be right, I never had an Apple II (Mac Classic was my first), I was just going off this interview with the logo's designer.

And the rainbow colors had to do with the USP of this product. The Apple computer was the only one that could show images in color.

Happy to be corrected if I am wrong!
 
Wow, this is really rather Meta

An article talking about commenters who commented on other articles?

I do take issue with being flatly labeled a critic of Tim Cook.

He has done many things I very much like and many things I do not like.

It’s much more on a spectrum as opposed to the binary that is being laid out here.
Just wait until someone writes an article about commenters commenting on articles about commenters commenting on comments. 😅
 
  • Haha
Reactions: turbineseaplane
That's it? To be fair, the Apple Watch was in the tech pipeline at Apple while Jobs was still at Apple. Anyway, I could list all the remarkable innovations under Jobs, but I think we all know that list is far longer. Compared to the innovation under Jobs in the same 14 year period, it's not even close.
Saying the Watch doesn’t count because it was in the pipeline under Jobs is like giving zero credit to the guy who actually executed, scaled it into the #1 watch in the world, and built the ecosystem around it. By that logic, nobody gets credit for anything.

Jobs was a once in a generation product visionary, no one’s debating that. But Cook turned Apple into a $3T machine, optimized the supply chain into an unfair advantage, and delivered arguably the biggest architectural shift Macs have ever seen with Apple Silicon. Different skill set, same elite impact. Not even close just tells me you’re judging vibes, not results.
 
Kind of a sad day. Tim was the last direct connection to Steve Jobs—handpicked by him as his successor. It feels like the true-end of Job’s era. Enjoy your semi-retirement, Mr. Tim Cook.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.