Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Macworld 2009: iPhone 32GB
- Thread starter nickspohn
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
drakeshipway
macrumors 6502
my 16GB is getting there,
but the battery isn't..
i think i'll stick with my 16GB, and just get an ipod (when they update the classic) say next september? i really do miss the scroll wheel.
but the battery isn't..
i think i'll stick with my 16GB, and just get an ipod (when they update the classic) say next september? i really do miss the scroll wheel.
Compile 'em all
macrumors 601
Luke1robb
macrumors 6502a
Please don't bring this ridiculousness into this thread. Let the iphone nano go to bed. It's not happening anytime soon.
juanster
macrumors 68020
GoCubsGo
macrumors Nehalem
Honestly, the OP can't know any more than anyone else. Posts like these are just speculation without any solid proof of the fact. The 32GB iPhone is an easy assumption due in part to the release of the 32GB iPod Touch. It's not like this is insider info.
A 32GB would be nice, I would consider it if I weren't looking to move to verizon.
A 32GB would be nice, I would consider it if I weren't looking to move to verizon.
No, that is incorrect. The impending 32GB iPhone assumption is due largely in part to the recent mass production of new 32GB NAND chips. A 32GB iPod Touch would have NOTHING to do with a 32GB iPhone. The iPod Touch has two NAND slots, and the iPhone has one. If anything, the only thing a 32GB iPod Touch would signify would be the release of a 16GB iPhone and, well... We've already got one.
