macworld is a mass-market show
And the way to reach the mass market is to be in NYC, clearly.
I believe apple backed out of boston, because it would be a complete, utter waste of money to have a show there. Let's look at all the arguments:
(1)
"Boston is nice, and New York is a pain in the ass, and expensive, and blah blah blah". Yeah, no ****; NYC *is* a pain in the ass. (Those of us who live here know that.) So, this argument would seem to be a better one for showgoers, and exhibitors. Well, I don't see why the showgoers matter; it isn't their expo. I'll accept that *maybe* there would be a slightly bigger exhibitor presence at Boston *now*, but Apple's trying to *expand* market share, not display to the world that they can't handle New York (running to a second-tier American city).
(2)
"Boston would put on a much better show...they care about it, etc. and so on". So what? Explain how this translates into more money for apple? Seems to me, the press that Apple gets from the NYC show FAR outweighs any possible negatives w/r/t how important the show is to New York. And let me tell you...this show isn't important to New York; it's important to Apple.
(3)
"Boston has a lot of universities and blah blah" Umm...Apple doesn't have Macworld Expo so they can sell to local businesses. That's what local sales reps and the Apple Stores are for. The Macworld Expos are NATIONAL events. Therefore, it makes sense to be where you will get the most press.
It seems to be it's a no-brainer. Name one (just one) major media outlet in Boston.
Explain to me how Apple will get post keynote interviews on CNBC, CNNfn, and other networks in Boston. Explain to me how they will get coverage in the New York Times, and Wall Street Journal. Explain to me how many international news outlets have bases in Boston.
The point of these shows is for Apple to make the maxiumum possible splash; they are the only times when people will stop and look at Apple; the only soapbox Apple has to stand on, to capture everybody's attention.
Whether the local show itself is more convenient, or more visited, or more expensive, is really unimportant compared to what kind of press and buzz the show itself will generate.
And, sorry...no Boston show ever generated anywhere near the buzz that the NYC Macworlds have.
Think of it another way...If you were going to create a show in...say...China, would you put it in Canton? No, you'd put it in Shanghai! Would you go to France and have an expo in Marseille? Of course not; you have it in Paris.
San Francisco is the center of the computing world, and New York is the l;argest, and most influential city in the country. Those are the logical best locations for these shows (if they continue to exist).