Huh!?!?! What do they put in the Nebraska water?
jlewis2k1 said:
im not a very happy camper. as far as im concern apple can kiss me away cause im not going to waste my time with their products anymore. anyone know if 10.4.4 will work for non-apple-expensive-computers?
The Pentium M - Yonah's predeccesor - was built on 90nm technology (same as the G5). Even then, a Pentium M in (about) the 2GHz range was (roughly) as fast/efficient as a 3.4GHz (+ or -) Pentium 4... Think about that for a second. And Yonah is built on the 65nm process. That's why they can fit 2 cores on a piece of silicone that's about the same size as the older Pentium M.
Also, NEC, Dell & other PC makers already announced their first laptops with Yonah - all of which ship around the same time as Apple's MacBook Pro. And for the most part they are comparable in price & performance. But they're not putting Yonah dual-cores in their "bargain basement" consumer laptops, because the dual-core Yonah is a "high-end" chip. The single-core versions of Yonah are geared towards "consumer" laptops & desktops, it is the replacement/successor to the Pentium M, and will be released around March or so...
I, for one, never understood all these posters on MacRumors, or the "experts" around the Mac rumor web, who believed Apple could miraculously afford to put a high-end, dual-core chip like Yonah in either the iBook or the mini... In all honesty, the "target market" for both those machines did not need the extreme power that a dual-core Yonah would bring. If they needed it, then they should buy the iMac or MacBook Pro.
The iBook will get the single-core Yonah later this Spring. It may get a dual-core Yonah down the line, but not before the 64bit, dual-core Merom debuts around September (in a MacBook Pro)... And, no, the iBook does not need the Merom!
The MacBook Pro - I know, that name's something hard to get used to - is not an evolutionary step, like some have stated. It is easily 4 times faster than the G4. That "struggling" 1.67GHz G4 on its 167MHz bus is paleolithic compared to the dual-core-G5 equivalent dual-core Yonah, even the "paltry" 1.67GHz in the base model... There's nothing paltry about it.
As for Rosetta running "legacy" pro apps... How much slower will Photoshop run on a 1.83GHz dual-core Yonah MacBook Pro (CPU equivalent of a high-end dual-core G5 or P4) that is performance-pound-for-pound 4x faster than the 1.67GHz G4 of the PowerBook? I don't think there will be that much of a performance hit, if at all (in certain operations)... Who knows, it may even be faster in some tasks.
So, if you want to buy a Vaio, by all means, do it... Have fun with security issues... Hope that it will run Vista - whenever it eventually ships... Deal with "Plug & Pray" and "Prays for Sure" everytime you add new hardware or software...