Disappointing. Wish I knew before I bought 2.
Simply return them if you're not happy.
Disappointing. Wish I knew before I bought 2.
The guy in the video said it’s because the 20 watt has the Fast Charge "Profile".Why wouldn’t the higher watt like MacBook 96w one charger slower I would think that would be more than enough to charge at 15w can someone explain why the 20w chargers faster than a 96w charger
No test with Ankers new 20watt charger??
Apple also removed earpods. Wet finger in the air, not shipping 80 million or so chargers and pods will reduce the impact of e-waste, smaller and light boxes reduce shipping costs and carbon footprint. So the claim by Apple is good claim.
- Apple removed the charger from the box
- Apple claims this was all for environmental reasons
Apple also did not raise the price of the lineup from lowest to highest.
- Apple did not drop the price to match the cost savings to Apple
Apple ensures that your phone is safe when using 15 watt charging.
- Apple introduces MagSafe wireless charging
- Apple ensures MagSafe only works full speed if you run out and buy its new, specific charger
Apple didn't lie about anything.
- Apple is a lying liar.
I don't really care.
The idea of plugging a charger into the wall, then plugging a very short cable into that charger, then connecting the end to the iPhone, and calling the whole thing "wireless", ignoring the two wires connecting the phone to the wall, seems just absurd to me. If you then consider that this so-called "wireless" contraption will charge with at most 15 Watt, but quite possible with less than 10 Watt, while inserting a good old Lightning cable gives you 20 Watt, then this must be the worst possible purchase that you could make.
It's part of the USB-C standards that any two USB devices should be capable of negotiating precisely how much power should be surplied. If their "signalling is not comparable", then someone has messed up. If both are Apple products, then Apple has messed up.
Excuse me, but you are saying you are going to buy MagSafe and then not use it? What's the logic behind that?
Clearly you haven’t seen the box. It is way, way, way smaller.Its laughable that anyone actually thought it was about saving the planet and not about profits.
I charge my iPad Pro with my 96w charger for my MacBook would it charge faster with the 20w one?
- Apple did not drop the price to match the cost savings to Apple
- Apple ensures MagSafe only works full speed if you run out and buy its new, specific charger
- Apple is a lying liar.
Nevermind, I found it.
![]()
So it runs 20W at 9V/2.22A. So that's the key thing - if the power adapter doesn't support 9V at that current, it's not going to be able to properly power the Magsafe 15W charger.
seems like a matter of PD 3.0 vs PD 2.0 chargers, if Apple hasn’t already announced a new version of PD. This will come to light at the latest when they allow manufacturers to certify for the new PD version.
and won’t be around much longer.Gee, just use that friggin' Lightning cable to charge your phone! Cheaper, faster, more energy-efficient.
Yeah, it’s hardly surprising that the $19 power adapter gives the spec’ed 15W charging.Par for the course.
I was curious about the output in regards to the 18watt charger from last year and had this nagging thought in the back in my mind that Anker and other third party chargers may not charge at the full 15w output. I hope Apple opens this up to more third party MFI chargers moving forward. I want to say they are being conservative in regards to the overheating potential but this would be a total bummer if only the 20watt adapter from Apple was the way to go.Anyone feels like this is a rip off?
Decided to look up PD 3.0 v 2.0 - the supposed difference is just that more information is exchanged. I guess it's possible that the MagSafe charger requires communication to regulate heat output before it's willing to charge at 15W?
Butt hurt much? Don’t use MagSafe if you don’t want to.
- Apple removed the charger from the box
- Apple claims this was all for environmental reasons
- Apple did not drop the price to match the cost savings to Apple
- Apple introduces MagSafe wireless charging
- Apple ensures MagSafe only works full speed if you run out and buy its new, specific charger
- Apple is a lying liar.
The 18 W charges it at 13 W. I’m gonna say that that’s not that bad. The difference between 13 W wireless charging and 15 W wireless charging can’t be that much. What, my phone gets to 50% a minute and a half later than it would?I was curious about the output in regards to the 18watt charger from last year and had this nagging thought in the back in my mind that Anker and other third party chargers may not charge at the full 15w output. I hope Apple opens this up to more third party MFI chargers moving forward. I want to say they are being conservative in regards to the overheating potential but this would be a total bummer if only the 20watt adapter from Apple was the way to go.
From my perspective, it would be a total physical bummer, if you could reach 15W charging capabilities with a 18 W adapter, if you charge inductive.this would be a total bummer if only the 20watt adapter from Apple was the way to go.
The charger is communicating with the device and I guess that newer charger just support the new MagSafe. By the way it prolongs the life of the device if temperature is kept down while charging.Why wouldn’t the higher watt like MacBook 96w one charger slower I would think that would be more than enough to charge at 15w can someone explain why the 20w chargers faster than a 96w charger
The 96W charger supports 9V at upto 3A, but still doesn’t hit the full speed per this article. So seems like there’s something else going on.Nevermind, I found it.
![]()
So it runs 20W at 9V/2.22A. So that's the key thing - if the power adapter doesn't support 9V at that current, it's not going to be able to properly power the Magsafe 15W charger.