Just a coincidence, seriously? Are we supposed to believe that two separate people happened to use the exact same wording/phrases/punctuation as well as examples. There is no way that this could be the case and there is not point in arguing against the evidence. It is so patently obivous I can't see why anyone is denying it...
As of right now, there is no proof that you can look at it as any more than a coincidence. I am believing that two people wrote nearly the same thing, as there is no connection between
hdm42's report posts online, and
greenmymac's thread here. It is not like
greenmymac could have found this on a website and just copy/pasted it,
hdm42 never posted this on a public page that
greenmymac would have had access to.
And how am I arguing against the evidence? There is no evidence of how
greenmymac would have got the report posts submitted by
hdm42, and until there is, there is no evidence against him, and I will stick to my side on this. Now if somebody were to provide an explanation as to how
greenmymac could have found
hdm42's wording, and if it were to be completely valid and believable, then I would accept that I would have been arguing a false side and that I was wrong, but until that happens, I will continue to defend
greenmymac on this issue, as he is being accused of doing something, while there is no possible way that he could have done it.