Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I stopped nearly 100% using WhatsApp since Facebook buy them. Only 1 person once in while send me message WhatsApp and everyone else use iMessages. Lucky nearly everyone have iPhone. I was 1st one my friends and family use iPhone 3GS and I slowly convert everyone to iPhone one by one.
 
At this point I’d jump off if I could but it only works if everyone you care about talking to does it with you. It’s too popular here in U.K. to do that.

If only BBM had moved cross platform earlier, they could have had this market.. I’d prefer that to be the standard over using something owned by Facebook.

I didn’t actually mind when it was 99p a year as a paid service sometime before the buyout!
 
In 2014, the EU Commission said that Facebook told it that there was no possibility to establish “reliable automated matching between Facebook users’ accounts and WhatsApp users’ accounts.” But in 2016, Facebook released an update to its terms of service that raised the possibility of linking accounts from both platforms.

The Commission said that contrary to Facebook’s statements in 2014 saying it wasn’t able to link accounts, the U.S. firm was aware that such a possibility existed.

Result:

Facebook fined €110 million ($122 million)

Facebook's response:

We’ve acted in good faith since our very first interactions with the Commission and we’ve sought to provide accurate information at every turn. The errors we made in our 2014 filings were not intentional and the Commission has confirmed that they did not impact the outcome of the merger review. Today’s announcement brings this matter to a close.

So having been fined in 2017 for merely having the capability whilst denying that it did, Facebook has now escalated matters by implementing the very merger of data and systems that the EU Commission had warned against.

So Facebook lied, got caught in a lie, paid a fine and now implements its previous lie as a formal policy in a move that runs contrary to EU law and explicitly against its prior submissions to the EU courts, the regulator and the EU Commission.

One can only presume that the EU is ready to enforce the law on a company that brazenly commits the criminal act of contempt of court and such an egregious regulatory breach.

Another fine is a given but we may see a more draconian action such as suspending the ability of FaceBook to trade in the EU until it divests itself of WhatsApp and convinces the regulator that it can make the strategic leadership changes in order to be trusted to operate within the law. Sadly I do not expect any criminal convictions for contempt of court, as much as I would wish it upon them.
 
That’s because their carriers have price-gouged them for SMS messages and they’ve had to outsource their message infrastructure to an app that Facebook provides “free” (aka in exchange for an all you can eat buffet of data).

Fortunately, US carriers never quite got around to making SMS super expensive so we don’t have to do that.
Another case of "since we're the land of the free I'm just going to assume a narrative that we are number one"? Like seriously, the whole damn world has pretty much moved on from regular SMS whenever they got the chance to do so; no matter if we get SMS for free for not (and many of us do; free sms and free calls, basically we're just paying for the amount of data that we want).
 
Result:



Facebook's response:



So having been fined in 2017 for merely having the capability whilst denying that it did, Facebook has now escalated matters by implementing the very merger of data and systems that the EU Commission had warned against.

So Facebook lied, got caught in a lie, paid a fine and now implements its previous lie as a formal policy in a move that runs contrary to EU law and explicitly against its prior submissions to the EU courts, the regulator and the EU Commission.

One can only presume that the EU is ready to enforce the law on a company that brazenly commits the criminal act of contempt of court and such an egregious regulatory breach.

Another fine is a given but we may see a more draconian action such as suspending the ability of FaceBook to trade in the EU until it divests itself of WhatsApp and convinces the regulator that it can make the strategic leadership changes in order to be trusted to operate within the law. Sadly I do not expect any criminal convictions for contempt of court, as much as I would wish it upon them.
A fine doesn't really mean that it was illegal, only that the one doing it had to pay a little bit extra; a calculated cost of doing business.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mabhatter
I will. I’ve used WhatsApp since day one. I was on the fence of leaving when FB bought them, but stayed. This is the end of the line for me. A shame, since WhatsApp is a great multi platform service. So long and thanks for all the fish.
Exactly the same for me. It's a good app and everyone I know uses it over any other messaging service. It's a pain but time to find something else. Signal?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jovijoker
Result:



Facebook's response:



So having been fined in 2017 for merely having the capability whilst denying that it did, Facebook has now escalated matters by implementing the very merger of data and systems that the EU Commission had warned against.

So Facebook lied, got caught in a lie, paid a fine and now implements its previous lie as a formal policy in a move that runs contrary to EU law and explicitly against its prior submissions to the EU courts, the regulator and the EU Commission.

One can only presume that the EU is ready to enforce the law on a company that brazenly commits the criminal act of contempt of court and such an egregious regulatory breach.

Another fine is a given but we may see a more draconian action such as suspending the ability of FaceBook to trade in the EU until it divests itself of WhatsApp and convinces the regulator that it can make the strategic leadership changes in order to be trusted to operate within the law. Sadly I do not expect any criminal convictions for contempt of court, as much as I would wish it upon them.
They recovered all that money in about 5 minutes. It’s why they don’t care. Government has to fine them a large percentage of their bottom line for the fines to mean anything.
 
I doubt many here who are already using WhatsApp will discontinue use, even though the privacy terms are terrible. You might as well give Facebook admin rights on your computer and allow them to remote access anything they want using TeamViewer.

I will never ever use this app or Facebook.

Too many people around me use WhatsApp, and I have only been able to migrate a small number of friends and colleagues onto telegram. We are stuck with it effectively.
 
That’s because their carriers have price-gouged them for SMS messages and they’ve had to outsource their message infrastructure to an app that Facebook provides “free” (aka in exchange for an all you can eat buffet of data).

Fortunately, US carriers never quite got around to making SMS super expensive so we don’t have to do that.

SMS is free, pretty much everywhere. People use WhatsApp because it provides so much more functionality over SMS - similar to iMessage - except platform agnostic.

I'm not sure how I feel about this. At every turn, users are being pillaged for data to sell us Ads. If you run an adblocker this is largely wasted. Even if a company like FB or Google got a perfect profile on my spending/usage habits, it impacts my life zero. If I started getting calls, emails, people coming to my house to sell things or any other nuisance, then I'd shut down these apps immediately.
 
When it comes to cellular services US (or NA for that matter) was always behind. SMS is old and limited which is not the same as other data centric platforms like whatsapp etc.
This new rule sucks so I guess a lot will move to telegram etc.
Or iMessage but that is limited to iOS which not everyone has. We shall see

That’s because their carriers have price-gouged them for SMS messages and they’ve had to outsource their message infrastructure to an app that Facebook provides “free” (aka in exchange for an all you can eat buffet of data).

Fortunately, US carriers never quite got around to making SMS super expensive so we don’t have to do that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mhnd
Whats App is owned by Facebook.

What do you expect? lol. You should expect this more on apps/products that will be developed/owned by them.
 
WhatsApp publicly protested Apple's requirement that developers submit information about what user data they collect for privacy labels on the App Store, saying that it could give its messaging app a competitive disadvantage.
These guys... being sneaky and sleazy, start like one type of service (which I paid by the way on iOS many years ago when it wasn’t free) and change along the way to something else IS what will give it a competitive disadvantage.

It's a great time to opt out of Facebook.

I don't know wtf Whatsapp is, but if they're related to Facebook you should opt out of that too.
It’s a messaging app, like any other but always tied to a phone number. It has end-to-end encryption by default like what Facebook secret conversations do (except facebook’s is kinda more hidden to start it), so it gave some sense of privacy... not anymore I guess.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FightTheFuture
I doubt many here who are already using WhatsApp will discontinue use, even though the privacy terms are terrible. You might as well give Facebook admin rights on your computer and allow them to remote access anything they want using TeamViewer.

I will never ever use this app or Facebook.
The problem I run into, and many people in similar situation, is that social groups I'm involved with all use WhatsApp....it's not an easy decision, otherwise I don't use it.
 
That’s because their carriers have price-gouged them for SMS messages and they’ve had to outsource their message infrastructure to an app that Facebook provides “free” (aka in exchange for an all you can eat buffet of data).

Fortunately, US carriers never quite got around to making SMS super expensive so we don’t have to do that.
Sorry what?? More insular American rubbish being spouted here. In Europe we have had unlimited texts (as in 10,000 per MONTH) for YEARS.

It's a big old world out there.
 
Time to do an experiment to see how important you are to your friend group…? ;)

All my work-related chat groups are on whatsapp as well. When I headed the maths department last year, I floated the idea of having everyone communicate via telegram. There was a lot of resistance to needing to download another app. In the end, I decided not to push it.

This is one fight I cannot win, and I am not going to stake my career on it.
 
Sorry what?? More insular American rubbish being spouted here. In Europe we have had unlimited texts (as in 10,000 per MONTH) for YEARS.

It's a big old world out there.
So 10k is unlimited? I am not arguing that the US system costs less, but we have had unlimited talk and text for many years, meaning unlimited, not high limit. 10k sounds a lot, but for heavy texters, people involved in groups and such, that’s fewer than 1 text (in or out) per 2 minutes in a 12 hour day. Factor in spamming, and it adds up fast.
 
Hasn't this already been happening? I have never once entered my phone number into Facebook but any time I open messenger its asking me to confirm my phone number and its showing it correctly. Just assumed they got it from WhatsApp.
 
I thought the EU only allowed the purchase of WhatsApp back in the day if they kept the two business separate with no data sharing whatsoever???
This is how modern businesses work as well as politics. You make small steps to the direction you want to go.
In government, it's the erosion of privacy. In business it's the merging.

Look at how the bells are merging back together with government permission after being broken apart.

This is how it works all over the world until the government has to step in and go "ok, you've gone too far, roll it back".
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.