Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
All I know is that every time I’ve traveled every single European or South American I’ve talked to has wanted to use WhatsApp and I thought, “gross, why the hell do you do this?” I get that SMS is not great, but neither is outsourcing all your communications to Facebook.
SMS is not an alternative worth pursuing. It‘s archaic, not even encrypted in transit. Might as well return to sending pigeons with letters around, has the same effect.
 
  • Like
Reactions: svanstrom
If the WhatsApp chat is end to end Encrypted, what privacy is everyone worried about?
Chat messages might be encrypted, meta data and everything else is not (your contacts, your profile, who you talk with, message frequency etc). That alone is valuable info for FB.
 
  • Like
Reactions: svanstrom
That’s because their carriers have price-gouged them for SMS messages and they’ve had to outsource their message infrastructure to an app that Facebook provides “free” (aka in exchange for an all you can eat buffet of data).

Fortunately, US carriers never quite got around to making SMS super expensive so we don’t have to do that.
Unlimited messaging has been a core part of UK price plans for years now. It’s not about the cost its about richness of features vs. SMS - group chats, calls, gifs, etc....
 
  • Like
Reactions: ignatius345
Chat messages might be encrypted, meta data and everything else is not (your contacts, your profile, who you talk with, message frequency etc). That alone is valuable info for FB.
but WhatsApp contacts is your phone list which every other app on your phone already has and thus Facebook even from outside has access to. WhatsApp doesn't have "profiles" and who you talk to is redundant as that's part of end to end encryption.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: 708692
but WhatsApp contacts is your phone list which every other app on your phone already has and thus Facebook even from outside has access to. WhatsApp doesn't have "profiles" and who you talk to is redundant as that's part of end to end encryption.
No. E2EE only covers a messages content (e.g. image, text). It does NOT cover when that message was sent, to whom, read state etc. WhatsApp absolutely knows that you sent 300 texts to your friend last night and the average time between texts was 10 seconds, with your friend talking to 3 more people at the same time and sharing 10 of your messages to them. They also know how often you open a chat conversation of your crush without sending a message.

Meta-data is power and as valuable as the content of a chat message.
 
I wonder if this is connected to Facebooks attack on apple's privacy-centric updates?

You know, that wounded animal Facebook was making themselves out to be.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Madhava
Unlimited messaging has been a core part of UK price plans for years now. It’s not about the cost its about richness of features vs. SMS - group chats, calls, gifs, etc....
Fair point. I had always heard that high SMS fees originally pushed a lot of worldwide users onto WhatsApp — or that WhatsApp swooped in just at the moment when SMS messages were bumping into their big limitations.

Given all that we know about Facebook at this point though, I’m always a bit shocked that people continue to advocate for using it.
 
I wonder if this is connected to Facebooks attack on apple's privacy-centric updates?

You know, that wounded animal Facebook was making themselves out to be.
This is most likely related to the shower thought of Zuckerberg from 2019, where he revealed that they'd eventually merge all 3 platforms (FB Messenger, WhatsApp and Instagram) to be one big messaging ecosystem. That way you can text someone using Instagram from your WhatsApp.
 
No. E2EE only covers a messages content (e.g. image, text). It does NOT cover when that message was sent, to whom, read state etc. WhatsApp absolutely knows that you sent 300 texts to your friend last night and the average time between texts was 10 seconds, with your friend talking to 3 more people at the same time and sharing 10 of your messages to them. They also know how often you open a chat conversation of your crush without sending a message.

Meta-data is power and as valuable as the content of a chat message.
but do most users even care unless its the CONTENT? day to day users use apps which share more than meta and even their content for ads like gmail for example. 90% of folks who complain about Facebook and ads use Hotmail or Gmail both of which have their content ready for adverts
 
Gah! I will stop using WhatsApp and delete my Facebook profile! Just to be sure I will smash my phone with a hammer! Also I will be sending a very angry e-mail to Mister Zuckerberg using Gmail and then order a new phone from Amazon. Noone's getting my data! Noone! HAHAHA!
 
I do not know why can't Apple ensure that apps require user consent for such collection as browser history! Why would Apple even allow browser history data be available to other apps in the first place? Entities like Facebook are only taking what Apple provides them means to take. Just as no app can access battery data and such other data on the iPhone, so could apps be restricted to access anything else they do not need access to for providing the user functionality they say they provide. I could be wrong, here.
 
Since WhatsApp's account is based on your phone number, but Facebook is an unrelated email-based account, are the two now going to be linked? And if so, what is the point in WhatsApp as it is basically the same as Facebook Messenger apart from the account?
 
but do most users even care unless its the CONTENT? day to day users use apps which share more than meta and even their content for ads like gmail for example.
Most users don't even care about any form of encryption as evident by the US with their iMessage / SMS duo. People in my country are heavily "anti-Facebook" yet they don't care that WhatsApp has been in FBs possession for over half a decade already.

Chances are, the majority of their target audience doesn't understand what meta-data is anyways so no, barely anyone cares. The few that do have either switched over to Signal or still drags along WhatsApp cause there barrier of entry for a new texting app / ecosystem is too big.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ignatius345
Since WhatsApp's account is based on your phone number, but Facebook is an unrelated email-based account, are the two now going to be linked? And if so, what is the point in WhatsApp as it is basically the same as Facebook Messenger apart from the account?
Chances are they already have a map of your phone number to your FB account anyways. Don't underestimate a crowd-sourced user database with all the contact lists they get pushed daily. Only requires a handful of users with your details to create a full profile to trace you.

That's also why I never really advise that you should delete your Facebook account. They've introduced a privacy tool a while ago, that lets you check out the info they collected on you from websites etc. (e.g. the ones that have a like button script) and request "deletion". If you delete your account, they create a shadow profile of you that you have no control of (you gift them your data essentially, with no way of checking it out or requesting removal, cause it's a shadow profile).
 
A shame, since WhatsApp is a great multi platform service. So long and thanks for all the fish.
WhatsApp is a terrible multi-platform service! The iPad app is abysmal, and the macOS app not much better. Having to reconnect via QR code all the time is a much worse experience than Facebook Messenger or Telegram, for example.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jovijoker
Gah! I will stop using WhatsApp and delete my Facebook profile! Just to be sure I will smash my phone with a hammer! Also I will be sending a very angry e-mail to Mister Zuckerberg using Gmail and then order a new phone from Amazon. Noone's getting my data! Noone! HAHAHA!

Thanks.
 
Well, SMS can't send picture. It can only carry 160 characters (these days they dissect it and rebuild it on the receiver phone so I think you can do up to 1600 chars). Regardless, SMS is ancient. Forget pictures, videos, voice messages etc. Its only text. So I'm sure you WOULD give a crap if you had just that.

Honestly, I could give a crap about SMS’s limitations. All I know is I have one app (Messages) which I can use to communicate to everyone and I don’t need to touch Facebook.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mhnd
WhatsApp is a terrible multi-platform service! The iPad app is abysmal, and the macOS app not much better. Having to reconnect via QR code all the time is a much worse experience than Facebook Messenger or Telegram, for example.
Heads up: There is no iPad app, you're using a 3rd party app that may or may not do malicious things with your data.

That being said, they're soon starting a beta test for their new multi-device system (use WhatsApp on other devices, independent of your phone), starting with WhatsApp web. Once they got that rolled out, they'll probably release the official iPad app they've had in development for a few years already.
 
WhatsApp is very popular messaging outside the US. The US is considered retrograde for using SMS.

Whatsapp has replaced SMS in most countries, even phone calls, as call quality is usually superior... this just gives the antitrust lawsuit more arguments on why FB should be splitted apart...
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.