That is exactly how I feel about 4K. Different strokes for different folks.As far as 8K goes: Give me a break. 8K is a solution in search of a problem which doesn't really exist.
That is exactly how I feel about 4K. Different strokes for different folks.As far as 8K goes: Give me a break. 8K is a solution in search of a problem which doesn't really exist.
Well, but why wouldn't they just wait to pull the old encoding until after they finished the new one? Why have an "outage" in the interim?
What?Samsung stopped making 4K Blu Ray players. That's gonna suck when I have to replace mine. I don't buy movies anymore but they make for the best streaming video players.
The home screen is just a simple, no BS, home screen. I just have the streaming services I subscribe to and nothing else. Unlike all the other streaming devices I've tried which clutter up the home screen with a bunch of ads for services I don't want or features I don't need. Most of which are non-removable. The worst being Amazon's Firestick then the Apple TV. Then ROKU putting ads as permanent buttons on the remote.
Exactly. Unless you can hold it in your hand, you are just leasing it with a one-time fee.And THIS is why you should still buy movies on disc -- no one can downgrade your 4K UHD Blu-ray disc.
How were they clear about that?
As much as I love Apple, I despise the iTunes digital movies and music term and agreements. The term and agreement of digital purchases do not protect customers from the content providers taking away customer purchases. Apple puts the burden of purchase protection to customers by having their customers backing up to he purchases themselves to the customer devices. Apple digital customers are vulnerable of losing their digital purchases anytime the content providers deciding no longer allowing Apple digital buyers have their purchased contents and Apple does not protects their digital media customers by letting this happen.
In my opinion, Apple could do better jobs on protecting their customer purchases by backing up all customer digital purchases in their servers since they are the seller so the customers are protected from losing their purchases and are still able to access their purchases even after the content providers remove their items and if they truly care about their customers.
It was all explained during the keynote and supplemental interviews with press and media.
Over the course of the last week or so, multiple Warner Bros movies that were previously available in 4K have reverted to HD, a change that applies to new purchases from iTunes as well as previously purchased movies.
There are complaints about the change both on Twitter and on the Blu-ray forums, as highlighted by 9to5Mac this afternoon. There are quite a few titles that have reverted from 4K to HD, including all of the Harry Potter movies.
![]()
A Blu-ray forums user compiled a list of the known titles that have recently been downgraded from 4K to HD.
[*]22 Jump Street (2014)
[*]About Last Night
[*]Aloha (2015)
[*]American Sniper
[*]Annie (2014)
[*]Batman vs. Superman
[*]The Brothers Grimsby (2016)
[*]The Equalizer (2014)
[*]Fast & Furious 6 (2013)
[*]Ghostbusters II (1989)
[*]Goosebumps (2015)
[*]Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Part 2 (2011)
[*]Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets (2002)
[*]Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Part 1 (2010)
[*]Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (2005)
[*]Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (2009)
[*]Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (2007)
[*]Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone (2001)
[*]Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban (2004)
[*]Hercules (2014)
[*]Hitch (2005)
[*]Hotel Deluxe (2013)
[*]Matrix Reloaded
[*]The Matrix Revolutions (2003)
[*]Risen (2016)
[*]Spaceballs (1987)
[*]Taxi Driver (1976)
[*]Unforgiven (1993)
[*]The Walk (2015)
[*]X-Men: Days of Future Past (2014)
It's not clear why these movies are no longer available in 4K, but there have been instances where movies are downgraded to HD and then are later made available again in 4K, so we'll need to wait to see if that's the case here.
![]()
One Apple support representative said that the downgrade was due to changes implemented by Warner Bros, which could potentially be accurate as that's often a reason why 4K availability shifts, but Apple support representatives don't always have the most up to date information.
Apple has been offering 4K movie titles from a range of different movie studios since the launch of the Apple TV 4K.
Update: This issue may be resolved as it appears many of the movies that were downgraded to HD are once again available in 4K.
Article Link: Many Warner Bros Movies Have Reverted to HD Instead of 4K on iTunes and in User Movie Libraries [Update]
I’m warning you, WB....I’m American....You touch my Harry Potter or X-MenOFP movies and I’ll sue.
So you were being sarcastic that it was sufficient for a POS TOS.
Not at all.
When Apple announced the Apple TV 4K and the ability to rent and purchase 4K movies, they noted that "iTunes users will get automatic upgrades of HD titles in their existing iTunes library to 4K HDR versions when they become available".
https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2017/09/apple-tv-4k-brings-home-the-magic-of-cinema-with-4k-and-hdr/
Apple Media Services Terms and Conditions make no mention (that I can find via a search) of you being guaranteed any specific resolution for the content you purchase or rent:
https://www.apple.com/legal/internet-services/itunes/us/terms.html
Spider Man Homecoming was originally marked as 4k. Mind you as noted here is wasn't actually but now it isn't even marked as such. Perhaps this was just Apple cleaning up but it's worth noting this isn't the first time Apple has made these adjustments, just the most high profile.
https://www.imore.com/many-4k-itunes-movies-upscaled-lower-resolutions
Depends. Most times, 1080p Blu Ray still looks better than iTunes 4K. Most consumers just tend to buy into the hype.Dark scenes and scenes involving snow really show up the weaknesses of 4K streaming with macro-blocking and/or banding which you just don't see on Blu Ray.
The H.265 codec uses a compression algorithm whereby a colour/shade is replaced with one of its nearest neighbours. This is called dithering. Sometimes its so aggressive that you get macro-blocking and banding. Other times, it's less noticeable but still there. I can usually tell by looking at the fabric of clothes - it usually looks a tad sharper on 1080p Blu Ray as opposed to 4K streams.
Think about it this way, a film compressed to a quarter of its original file size would indicate that overall, a 4-pixel cluster containing different shades would be replaced with a single shade. That is the equivalent of taking a 1080p film and upsampling it on a 4K screen whereby each individual pixel is now represented by 4 pixels...
For instance, Aquaman was one of the first 4K iTunes films to be cracked. It had a bitrate of 14.2 Mb/s with the H.265 codec. To convert that to the codec as used by Blu Ray (H.264), it would likely double its size and a tad more. Let's be generous and say that it's the equivalent of 35 to 40 Mb/s. Now if you were to go look at the bitrates for ripped Blu Ray remuxes (1:1 conversions), they tend to be 35 to 45 Mb/s.
TLDR: A bit-starved 4K stream is kind of like taking a 1080p Blu Ray and upsampling it on a UHD screen. Even though both pictures are still represented by 3840x2160 pixels, it doesn't really mean they are real 4K...
If you hadn't read the article, you probably would not have known about this problem, which persisted for only a few hours. So stop reading MacRumors-- it's bad for your blood pressure.
Or alternatively, keep reading MacRumors, but develop patience.
Well, but why wouldn't they just wait to pull the old encoding until after they finished the new one? Why have an "outage" in the interim?
This is Apple, when have they done any web services correctly. Amazon, Google, etc would have probably done it the way you mentioned, Apple on the other hand well, Thank Different (aka, we are stilling figuring out how to do web services right).![]()
Half of those titles don't benefit from 4K because the master copy even from the 35mm print is too soft to benefit.
Only those who want to examine the tiny difference perhaps "visible" to close inspection on overpriced kit will miss 4K. My 27" monitor is 2.5k and more than enough.
has anyone seen any more updates on this? I still have a few that are showing as HD and not 4k when they were 4K last week: Hunger Games being one, as well as Fast and Furious. Most of the ones named in the original list are all showing as 4K again...
There's a lot more to 4K than just the resolution.
That's obvious. But "Ghostbusters" won't benefit from a 4K remaster or a HDR re-edit. In some cases doing that to an older movie makes it visually worse.