Become a MacRumors Supporter for $25/year with no ads, private forums, and more!

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
52,095
13,713


Apple and Facebook have been in a very public spat over the course of the last few months as Apple dials up its pro-privacy stance. The two companies have long had tension, but more recently, Facebook is taking shots at an upcoming iOS and iPadOS feature that will require apps and data companies such as Facebook to ask for users' permission before tracking them across other sites and websites.

tim-cook-mark-zuckerberg.jpg

While for the most part, the war of words between the tech titans has remained professional, Mark Zuckerberg and Tim Cook have also shared a barrage of attacks toward each other. During a 2018 interview in the midst of Facebook's notorious Cambridge Analytica scandal, Cook was asked how he would lead Apple if it were to face a similar crisis. Cook responded by ruling the hypothetical situation out of the question, saying Apple would not be in the situation Facebook was in, thanks to its differing stance on privacy and user data. Zuckerberg shot back, calling Cook's comments on TV "extremely glib" and "not at all aligned with the truth."

Zuckerberg, outraged by Cook's comments and public influence on Facebook's reputation, reportedly told internal aides and team members that Facebook needs to "inflict pain" on Apple, according to sources who spoke on anonymity to The Wall Street Journal. Last month, during the company's earnings call, Zuckerberg called Apple an increasingly bigger threat to Facebook and accused the Cupertino tech giant of using its platforms to interfere with how Facebook operates its own apps.

The day after the public comments, Cook responded indirectly in a speech during the Computers, Privacy, and Data Protection conference where he condemned Facebook and implied that its business model of maximizing engagement leads to division and violence. During the same speech, Cook censured Facebook's potential role in the January 6 U.S. Capitol riot, blaming the social media company's algorithms for spreading conspiracy theories.

In December, Facebook ran full-page ads attacking Apple's up-and-coming App Tracking Transparency (ATT) requirement that will force apps to ask for users' permission before tracking them across apps and the internet. Facebook is attacking Apple from the standpoint that ATT will hurt small businesses that rely on personalized ads derived from effective tracking. In response, Cook directly weighed in on Twitter, stating that Apple simply wants to give users a choice about whether they wish to be tracked or not.

Despite the personal jabs and attacks, in a statement given to The Wall Street Journal, Facebook spokeswoman Dani Lever refuted the idea that the tension between the companies is personal, suggesting instead that it was "about the future of the free internet." Facebook states that choosing between tracking users for personalized ads and protecting their privacy is a "false-trade off," claiming that it believes it can provide both. The spokeswoman reiterated past remarks by Facebook stating that Apple's privacy features are not meant to preserve user privacy, but are instead about increasing profit, and that Facebook will join others to highlight Apple's "self-preferencing, anticompetitive behavior."

Apple declined to comment on the report.

Facebook is reportedly planning to take its disapproval with Apple to court, as it's allegedly been preparing to file an antitrust lawsuit against the Cupertino-based tech company over its "unfair" approach to privacy with ATT and iMessage. As part of its lawsuit, Facebook is considering partnering with other companies such as Epic Games, which is already embroiled in a massive legal battle with Apple, to propel its antitrust case forward. Facebook may, however, scrap its plans to bring forward any form of legal action against Apple.

Senator Mike Lee of Utah, who leads the Republicans' effort in the Senate antitrust subcommittee, told The Wall Street Journal that the feud between Apple and Facebook sits at the "nexus of privacy and antitrust," and that he doesn't want to "impose regulation that just ends up protecting incumbents and entrenching monopolies."

Apple has committed to launching ATT with iOS and iPadOS 14.5 in the "early spring" and Facebook has seemingly admitted defeat in its failed attempt to stop the new requirement from going into action. Apps have the freedom to customize the prompt that users will receive asking for their permission to be tracked across other apps and the web, and screenshots of Facebook's prompt for its iOS app show that it pleads with users to opt in to tracking in order to receive "a better ads experience."

Article Link: Mark Zuckerberg Reportedly Told Staff Facebook Needs to 'Inflict Pain' on Apple Over Privacy Dispute
 
Last edited:

Freeangel1

macrumors 6502
Jan 13, 2020
441
382
Comment

betterbegood

macrumors regular
May 21, 2014
231
374
San Lonkong
As much as I despise any person who is following any company like a religion (some users on forum included), Facebook really is the tech scum of the earth. The amount of data versus what they give people is such an insane ratio in their favor that I wish their company would walk the same fields as Myspace very soon.
 
Comment

svanstrom

macrumors 6502a
Feb 8, 2002
787
1,721
🇸🇪
Poor Facebook, maybe if they weren't such an evil corporation, Apple wouldn't have to do this.
We, the people, still need this, though.

Essentially this whole mess is a result of the technology being developed for it's functionality, at a time where there were no privacy worries of this kind. So tech just needs to catch up with the needs of the people.

The abusers of the lack of tech privacy will continue to cry out about this, but will ultimately find themselves having been on the wrong side of history. So the tech rich people will one day sit there when they are old getting interviewed about their awaking, and how they are now such good people donating a fraction of their illegitimate gains to causes slightly undoing the mess they made.
 
Comment

Cmdrx3

macrumors regular
Apr 5, 2013
110
83
I'm not a huge Facebook use anyway so if it's a choice between having my iPhone without Facebook or an android with, I'm sorry Facebook but you'll be relegated to PC use only. Not that I dislike android, I still use an android tablet (occasionally) I just dislike it for my phone.
 
Comment

Rob_2811

macrumors 68030
Mar 18, 2016
2,566
4,252
United Kingdom
We, the people, still need this, though.

Essentially this whole mess is a result of the technology being developed for it's functionality, at a time where there were no privacy worries of this kind. So tech just needs to catch up with the needs of the people.

The abusers of the lack of tech privacy will continue to cry out about this, but will ultimately find themselves having been on the wrong side of history. So the tech rich people will one day sit there when they are old getting interviewed about their awaking, and how they are now such good people donating a fraction of their illegitimate gains to causes slightly undoing the mess they made.

Does this include China where Apple aid the surveillance state?
 
Comment

Pangalactic

macrumors 6502
Nov 28, 2016
486
1,322
The spokeswoman reiterated past remarks by Facebook stating that Apple's privacy features are not meant to preserve user privacy, but are instead about increasing profit, and that Facebook will join others to highlight Apple's "self-preferencing, anticompetitive behavior."

Apple declined to comment on the report.

Oh no! A for-profit corporation is making money by selling privacy-focused technology that is actually good! What a shocker! :rolleyes: Looking forward to Facebook switching its status to a non-profit charity this year.
 
Comment
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.