Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Radium: If you like listening to radio stations this little app is pretty cool and sits in the menu bar with a simple drop down and search for most digital radian stations.

----------


I suppose most people missed the genius humour with that comment, I for one was in stitches when I read it! :D
 
Skitch - Honestly, I haven't used this at all yet, but I've read really good reviews about how this lets you grab screenshots or images and modify them. It's no Photoshop but it's free, so I thought I'd check it out.

I use Skitch all the time. I use it mostly for quick screenshots (whole or part of the screen) and one-click sharing to a variety of services. But, you can do some simple image editing with it, too.

Alfred - The new "Quicksilver", from what I'm told. Basically, Alfred will take inventory of everything on your computer. Assign it to a hotkey and with the click of a couple buttons, you can start typing anything and it'll pull up whatever it is you're looking for. You can even search text within documents!

I never used Quicksilver, nor did I ever much use Spotlight, so I can't compare, but Alfred is really, really good and I believe does much more.

I hesitate to get into the whole "iPhoto vs. Picasa" issue, but depending on how you want to use/organize/share your photos, you can find tons of discussions just by Googling. iPhoto has a lot to offer, and if you're only going to use other Apple devices, you probably just want to stick with it. But I happen to be a Picasa fan, especially since my phone is Android and I don't have an iPad/iPod to coordinate with. So I'll throw that out there for new Mac owners, since many of them might have come from Picasa on Windows anyway. You can still use it on Mac OS, if that's what you're used to and you want to keep using it. Both programs are very good, but different. It just depends on what suits you better.
 
In most cases, app removal software doesn't do a thorough job of finding and removing files/folders related to deleted apps.
What those apps do is what your last link is describing: doing a quick search using Spotlight and then offering the results to the user who can confirm to delete them or not. Your guide is a fine guide but it requires some level of experience with the OS which some people do not have. Those app removal software fills in that blank and offers a much more simplistic approach. It is simply a bit more userfriendly than your guide is.

As always one does need to do a bit of research before installing such apps. There are some apps that can wreak havoc and cause all sorts of problems. It is best to avoid those. This applies to all applications though (and even to all tweaks like the "defaults write..." stuff!).

Btw, if you are into commandline stuff than iTerm2 is a big recommendation. It is much better than Terminal, especially when combined with the special tmux build (which in the future should not be needed any more; iTerm2 is collaborating with the tmux team).
I also like tools like nmap, TextWrangler, iStumbler, kismac, mercurial, sourcetree, macirssi/irssi, macports and tmux but I'm more into the UNIX part of the system. What apps are good sort of depends on what kind of user you are. I think the above apps work nicely on a small notebook like the Air because they are great for troubleshooting which is what I'm going to use it for (as for many other things).
 
I use Skitch all the time. I use it mostly for quick screenshots (whole or part of the screen) and one-click sharing to a variety of services. But, you can do some simple image editing with it, too.



I never used Quicksilver, nor did I ever much use Spotlight, so I can't compare, but Alfred is really, really good and I believe does much more.

I hesitate to get into the whole "iPhoto vs. Picasa" issue, but depending on how you want to use/organize/share your photos, you can find tons of discussions just by Googling. iPhoto has a lot to offer, and if you're only going to use other Apple devices, you probably just want to stick with it. But I happen to be a Picasa fan, especially since my phone is Android and I don't have an iPad/iPod to coordinate with. So I'll throw that out there for new Mac owners, since many of them might have come from Picasa on Windows anyway. You can still use it on Mac OS, if that's what you're used to and you want to keep using it. Both programs are very good, but different. It just depends on what suits you better.

fastest way to get a screen shot is cmd-shift-3 :)
 
What those apps do is what your last link is describing: doing a quick search using Spotlight and then offering the results to the user who can confirm to delete them or not.
The problem is that their search is not thorough. Spotlight doesn't show search results from library folders. Finder does.

Your guide is a fine guide but it requires some level of experience with the OS which some people do not have.
Not so much experience with the OS as an ability to use Finder and follow a few simple steps.
Those app removal software fills in that blank and offers a much more simplistic approach.
In that simplicity lies some problems. Some of those apps delete files without asking first. Some delete smaller files and leave much larger ones behind.

If simplicity is the goal, just drag the .app file to the Trash. That's simpler than any of those apps.

If freeing up drive space and completely removing apps is the goal, follow the Finder instructions. That's more effective than any of those apps.
 
- Safari 6 Beta for browsing (Mac native, Chrome-esque omnibar, etc.)
- Sparrow for email
- Messages Beta for iMessage/IM
- Twitter for Mac (or Osfoora)
- Omnifocus for GTD
- Fantastical for calendaring/scheduling
- Reeder for RSS
- VLC for video
- Pages for word processing
- iA Writer for cloud-centric writing
- Coda for HTML/CSS
- iPhoto
- LittleSnapper for screenshots
- Alfred for productivity
- Droplr for link shortening
- Dropbox for syncing

There are plenty of options, but I'm particularly partial to these. All are available from the Mac App Store aside from VLC and Messages Beta.
 
The problem is that their search is not thorough. Spotlight doesn't show search results from library folders. Finder does.
What you mean with "Spotlight" is the icon in the menubar, what I mean is the actual system that you manipulate with tools like mdutil and is used by that icon, Finder and has it's own cli tool (=mdfind). It is only the Spotlight icon in the menubar that doesn't search through system files such as the library, everything else (and thus the entire search system known as Spotlight) does. Applications can perfectly use the underlaying system to do their searches.

In that simplicity lies some problems. Some of those apps delete files without asking first. Some delete smaller files and leave much larger ones behind.
The same applies to your guide: you always need to have some kind of knowledge because you always run the risk of deleting too much. Files can be shared among other applications from the same software maker. It doesn't matter if the user selects everything and deletes them or some application automatically does this for them. In both cases the files will be deleted and it is this action that can cause problems.

If simplicity is the goal, just drag the .app file to the Trash. That's simpler than any of those apps.
At the cost of leaving all those files like preferences and even data which then need to be deleted by hand. Not so much "simplicity".

If freeing up drive space and completely removing apps is the goal, follow the Finder instructions. That's more effective than any of those apps.
No it isn't because freeing up drive space and deleting apps are 2 completely different goals/functions! The Finder instructions are only useful for the first, it is useless for the second as the user needs to know exactly what to look for and what to delete. If you want to free up disk space you first want to know what is taking up the most space and then if you can delete it or not. Software such as OmniDiskSweeper or Grandperspective (both are freeware) are great for mapping what data is the biggest. With this information you can then go look for it and delete it (if you want).
 
Disk Inventory X. Not on the app store, but free. Best way to see where your disk space is going, which is a critical activity with the smaller SSDs.
 
Disk Inventory X. Not on the app store, but free. Best way to see where your disk space is going, which is a critical activity with the smaller SSDs.

A good suggestion but I prefer Omnidisksweeper its also free but I like how it reports the diskspace, its a little easier to see the folders/files.
 
At the cost of leaving all those files like preferences and even data which then need to be deleted by hand.
If a user just wants the app deleted and doesn't worry about drive space, simply dragging the app to the trash is all that's required. You don't need to delete plists and other data to have the app uninstalled.
No it isn't because freeing up drive space and deleting apps are 2 completely different goals/functions! The Finder instructions are only useful for the first, it is useless for the second as the user needs to know exactly what to look for and what to delete.
I'm referring only to the disk space consumed by apps you want to delete, not other things that may occupy disk space. The point is this: in most cases you can run any of those uninstall apps and then use the Finder method to find app-related files/folders that those apps failed to identify or delete. I'm referring to files that have the app's name in the file name.

Those apps are not completely effective in removing all app components. The Finder method is more thorough, even if the user only deletes files that have the app's name. If you took the time to read the links I've posted, you'd see the tests that prove this. I don't know why you're being obtuse about this, when there are documented facts proving those apps are not as effective as the Finder method.
 
In that case you fail to understand what Spotlight is and does exactly. If you have ever really used the other search methods such as mdfind you'd know that this is completely different from what the search in Finder and the Spotlight window do. In Finder you need to tell it to search for system files and folders whereas mdfind does this already by default. When an application uses this method to search it will find as much or more than the Finder search will. This can also be combined with other UNIX tools to broaden the search a bit.

You also completely fail to provide any proof at all that clearly shows that app deletion programs are not good at their job. You only give some figures and only link to you posting those figures. I nor anybody else is able to reproduce because it is unclear where you got the data from and how you got it. For all I know you may as well have sucked it right out of your thumb. When going through information on the internet one has to account for things like this.

To give an example of what I mean: One of the things that is missing are the locations of the files in the search results. When you've installed something like Macports and you install Opera as well you'll see quite a lot of duplicates: some of them belonging to Macports (which you do not want to delete nor is it necessary to do so) and some of them belonging to the installed Opera. If you made a backup, copied it elsewhere, etc. this will also show up.

So yes I did read your posts but flagged them as unusable due to the enormous lack of proof and inability to reproduce it myself. Not to mention that posts about these apps made in late 2010 and early 2011 are quite outdated when we are halfway through 2012. Some people actually think about what they read, not everybody simply assumes something is true ;)
 
You also completely fail to provide any proof at all that clearly shows that app deletion programs are not good at their job. You only give some figures and only link to you posting those figures. I nor anybody else is able to reproduce because it is unclear where you got the data from and how you got it.
That is false. You obviously haven't read the tests or looked at the screen captures.
To give an example of what I mean: One of the things that is missing are the locations of the files in the search results. When you've installed something like Macports and you install Opera as well you'll see quite a lot of duplicates: some of them belonging to Macports (which you do not want to delete nor is it necessary to do so) and some of them belonging to the installed Opera. If you made a backup, copied it elsewhere, etc. this will also show up.
Anyone can reproduce the tests for themselves. Clicking on any of the files in the search results will show the location in the status bar, proving they're not copies or backups.
Not to mention that posts about these apps made in late 2010 and early 2011 are quite outdated when we are halfway through 2012.
As I suspected, you haven't read all the links, including the test results from March 23, 2012.

Anyone who is sensible and not trying to be argumentative will read my posts and test for themselves to prove that my statements are 100% factual. There have been countless examples through this forum where someone used the Finder method after using one of those apps, only to find additional files the app left behind. If you don't want to use the Finder method, then don't. Use any or all of those apps, if you wish. I guarantee they're leaving files behind, but if that doesn't matter to you, that's fine. I don't care what you do, but many have used the method I posted and found results superior to using any of those apps.

Some people actually think about what they read, not everybody simply assumes something is true ;)
So don't assume anything. Run the tests for yourself and you'll find that my posts are accurate.
 
For my purposes:

Dropbox
Evernote
Scrivener
curio core
Caffeine
Alfred
DevonThink
Circus Ponies Notebook
iPhoto
MO Office
 
thank you all for the responses. I will get my new mac on the 28th of July. Thanks again
 
Of the above lists, I 2nd that you should not use any "cleaner" or "uninstaller" tools. As for media player, I prefer MPlayer X (not extended). Also I want to add:

- Carbon Copy Cloner instead of Time Machine. CCC makes bootable backups, which is much more useful that time machine backups which can be a bit unpredictable.
- Fantastical. Awesome iCal helper which takes natural language input to add and manage events.



Apart from what comes standard, I recommend:
Evernote (but this could be obsolete soon given the changes in Mountain Lion)

How is Mountain Lion going to obsolete Evernote?
 
That is false. You obviously haven't read the tests or looked at the screen captures.
In that case you are the one who hasn't read the tests nor looked at the screen captures or are simply denying it as if your life depends on it.

You only mention you ran "some tests" with certain apps and provided "some figures". Nowhere did you specify what you tested exactly, how you tested, the exact locations of the files, etc. so there is no way somebody else can reproduce the tests. If you think otherwise then provide the test plan shown in the 3 links you gave. The screen captures do not cover this either. If you look closely at the screen captures you immediately see why they are not very usable. The mere fact that installer is considered part of an app is very strange. Do explain.

Anyone who is sensible and not trying to be argumentative will read my posts and test for themselves to prove that my statements are 100% factual.
Anyone who is sensible will see the faults in your 3 links and tell you that your statements are definitely not 100% factual. There is a major difference between thinking they are and actually being factual. Since you wrote it you need to rely on others to tell the difference. There is nobody in the world who is able to objectively judge his own work. The problem here is that one needs to value other people's judgements and not immediately dismiss them as being false, incorrect, etc. as you are doing now. This is considered to be childish and stupid. If you actually listen you are showing that you are mature and want a higher quality.

There have been countless examples through this forum where someone used the Finder method after using one of those apps, only to find additional files the app left behind.
Which, upon closer inspection, are almost always topics asking about a better way of removing an app completely because manually removing it from /Applications leaves some files. They did not use your Finder method nor did they use any app removal tools.

If you don't want to use the Finder method, then don't. Use any or all of those apps, if you wish. I guarantee they're leaving files behind, but if that doesn't matter to you, that's fine. I don't care what you do, but many have used the method I posted and found results superior to using any of those apps.
Except for the fact that you simply have no proper proof that this is the case. There is other proof that shows that you are incorrect in this regard (all you are doing is a filename search which any app can do). That is all I'm saying.

So don't assume anything. Run the tests for yourself and you'll find that my posts are accurate.
You are making the assumptions of me not reading stuff, etc. for the mere fact that I simply disagree with your information and how you tested it. Instead of denying and trying to defend yourself it would be a lot better if you simply told us how you tested exactly so people can actually mimic your tests. The way it is now is definitely not helpful.

It would help if you would listen to people who critique your information instead of defending it as if your life depends on it and accusing them of all sorts of things. The first would be considered "mature", the latter would be considered "childish". It also stops you from providing incorrect information to somebody which does the opposite of helping them. That prevents people from becoming angry with you because the information you provided wasn't correct and it broke something. It is in your very own interest to stop this childish behaviour of "I wrote it and therefore it is correct!".
 
If anyone thinks one of those app-removal tools is more effective or as effective as the Finder method, they can simply run a test for themselves, as I have done many times with many such tools. They can select an app for deletion and let the tool of their choice identify what files it can. Then they can perform the Finder search as described and see if it finds more app-related files than the tool they're evaluating. It's so simple, even a cave man can do it.

It appears you're unwilling to do such a test for yourself, choosing instead to make vain attempts to discredit a solution that has worked extremely well for many users over the years. If you can demonstrate that any such app-removal tool can identify as many app-related files as Finder, please do so. I've provided my evidence. You've provided none.

I'm not going to continue debating with you, as you appear to only want to argue for the sake of arguing. Until you can provide some documented evidence that any of these app-removal tools are more effective than the Finder method, you're just making noise. If you respond again without providing such evidence, you'll prove my point.
 
Here is my personal list of must-have apps!

*Note: I am a University student

Google Chrome - I use gmail as my main email address so I have bookmarks synced onto my account. I also like how it has it's own flash player, unlike Firefox/Safari/Opera.

Sparrow - Great Looking email client. Syncs with all 3 gmail accounts (2 personal, 1 university) flawlessly.

Reeder - Great Looking RSS feeder. Also syncs with my google account. It looks nice and is very organized.

Pixelmator - Cheaper alternative to Photoshop. I like this over photoshop because I find it easier to use.

Microsoft Office 2011 - A MUST HAVE if you want to survive university/college.

iTunes - It's iTunes.

Steam - If you are a hardcore or casual gamer, you need to get this. The Mac library is growing bigger every month.

The Unarchiever - Unzips many file types.

MPlayer OS X Extended - Plays every file I've thrown at it. I use it mainly to watch .mkv (720p and 1080p supported) with subtitles.

OPTIONAL

iStat Menu 3 - Good for checking stats of your computer, like temp and ram usage. The Clock and Battery menu items are much better than the default counterparts.

VMWare Fusion 4 - Not really a must-have, but I'm too lazy to dual boot (bootcamp) and I only want windows to play visual novels.

Growl - Hit or Miss. But it rocks when it works.

Hyperdock - Makes your dock look nice and feel nice!

Xee - Good alternative to Preview.

KopyPasta - Remembers what you copied on clipboard. Good for programming or organizing essays.



Hyperdock is a great app it's what I use all the time has window snapping included too.
 
Does hyperdock show chrome tabs for window preview?

Also is apple adding any of hyperdocks features in mountain lion?
 
The problem is that their search is not thorough. Spotlight doesn't show search results from library folders. Finder does.


Not so much experience with the OS as an ability to use Finder and follow a few simple steps.

In that simplicity lies some problems. Some of those apps delete files without asking first. Some delete smaller files and leave much larger ones behind.

If simplicity is the goal, just drag the .app file to the Trash. That's simpler than any of those apps.

If freeing up drive space and completely removing apps is the goal, follow the Finder instructions. That's more effective than any of those apps.

doesn't spotlight in ML now search through library and other folders?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.