SNIP
Matte has the advantage of being "all-terrain", better resistant to fingerprints and look more "professional", however, glossy has better viewing angles, sharper images and look more modern.
SNIP
FMD replied to this:
I have to disagree with you on the "viewing angles" You can view a matte screen from any angle where as the glossy you have to find the right angle to view at due to the disturbance of reflections and glares from light.
SNIP
There are two different factors when one considers the
viewing angle of an LCD panel.
Technically, "viewing angle" refers to the angular degree of deviation from "dead center" (i.e. zero degrees X and Y; a line segment from your nose to the screen creates a perpendicular angle with the plane of the screen). Within the good "viewing angle," the screen appears to be the same gamma (brightness/contrast) and color as it appears when viewed from "dead center." The panels with the best viewing angles on the market can be viewed from almost 170 degrees to the side and still appear the same as from the front, in terms of color and brightness. Meanwhile, displays with shallow (read: crappy) viewing angles will undergo shifts in gamma and color when they are tilted. I believe this definition is what Tanegashima meant in the quote above.
Meanwhile, FMD means something entirely different by "viewing angle." He refers to a situationally-dependent probability that, in any given lighting condition, the glare on the screen will restrict some particular viewing angles of the screen. However this is not a property of the LCD panel itself, but rather, this is a property of the glass in front of the LCD.
I think we all know that the glass (read: "glossy") screens have more reflection. OK.
But the question is, is there a difference in the viewing angle of the LCD itself between the "glossy" and the "matte" MacBook Pro? Tanegashima seems to think that the former has a panel with a better viewing angle. Is this really true?
I am currently typing on the 15" matte display, and I can tell you, it is a very beautiful display, but any slight tilt of the display will lead to a shift in gamma. So if you were to use it for photo editing (as I do), then you are going to have problems if you accidentally slouch in your seat without realizing it, and make your picture too bright to compensate for the screen's limited viewing angle causing the image to appear darker than it should.
Now, I don't care about the viewing angle because I know about this problem, and therefore I am not going to accidentally slouch in my seat. Plus I will always use my external screens on my Mac Pro for any serious color matching work. Moreover I'm just happy that the MBP display panel is a high-gamut panel.
But I'm still curious if the glossy displays have a better viewing angle, for the sake of argument. Anybody?