You don't need a pedometer if you don't have legs.
You don't need a pedometer if you don't have legs.
Yup. I was a heavy Facebook user back then, especially in utilizing the photo album features. And back then, Facebook was useful in keeping track what friends are posting.Back when Facebook was growing it seemed like he had a number of pillars to fall back on
- Games/Social apps - everything from scrabble through to FarmVille and other casual games ran on the Facebook platform and got people playing with each other. What happened to this? Why wasn't his built on, expanded, made more premium, better experience etc.
- Photo curation - albums, tags, friends etc. - for a while it was one of the few places you could organise your photo library and if you understood it, could share photos with friends etc. Now people are less keen on this. Photos are sent privately in WhatsApp, or shared using google photos or apple photos etc. What happened to this? why wasn't this built on? It kept people on the platform
- Commerce - people would tag their interests and therefore make it easy to serve up adverts, Facebook could have pushed this hard and become a customisable shopping platform.... but instead they relied on the adverts only which would then capture information to sell to customers, rather than keeping people on the Facebook website or in the app, doing the buying and selling inside Facebook.
Look how 'sticky' sites like Reddit are, or even twitter. People are so engaged, looking, checking etc. So much of that with Facebook is dead or dying. They've just let it rot as Zuck has been obsessed with the vapourware that is 'the meta verse' which sounds like something Adam Neumann would dream up as part of his latest scam.
In any normal company, Zuck would be booted out, and Facebook would have a 'Satya Nadella' moment. Facebook is wildly successful but they definitely need a new chief to take them to the next level, just as Microsoft did.
I hope they consulted some actual wheelchair users on that language: “walking” and “running” pace?
Which has never worked anywhere in the world at any point in history, so what is the point..... In an imaginary economic system where the workers have more power, they might have ousted him. Instead, with Meta, it's the shareholders who can oust him, not the staff.
It doesn't measure steps but that's not exactly what I meant...
Zuck trying desperately to pivot to something else, as you might expect. Sometimes people really do have only one 'big idea' which makes them rich and which they can do well. An option for him would be to double down on Facebook and just focus on making the experience richer, better, more personal, with more options for commerce, business etc.
But instead Facebook are determined to go down a hardware route.
Facebook really stopped being 'cool' (if they ever were) a decade ago. So what have they got? a social media platform for those who are 30+ years old. They own the Oculus VR headsets which are good enough and have a niche.
Who would ever want a Facebook watch?
One failure after the other. Truly exquisite business.
Excuse me what? A failure after the other? Bad at scaling? We're talking about one of the biggest companies not only in the US, but in the entire world. Facebook is in the 1%.“Zuckerberg said the layoffs were the combined result of his own poor decisions, macroeconomic downturn, increased competition, and ads signal loss, all of which resulted in lower-than-expected revenue…”
But mostly his own bad decisions.
Given how Zuck isn’t very good at scalability and sustainability of anything original, and Google is more or less the place where acquisitions go to die, I have new found respect for Apple which not only successfully scales new ideas, but successfully integrates it’s acquisitions.
And worse and with less features etcRight and googles approach was literally "take the Apple Watch and make it round". Let's see how that will turn out ...
Excuse me what? A failure after the other? Bad at scaling? We're talking about one of the biggest companies not only in the US, but in the entire world. Facebook is in the 1%.
Only good thing I can ever thing of with insane tracking is needing an alibiOh this is a big loss to everyone who wants to collect copious personal data from Facebook users and utilise it in a nefarious manner.
I am convinced most people don’t care. I believe you and I are in a tiny minority. Our philosophy on the matter is so logical and so fundamental to freedom, it’s hard to comprehend not caring. But most people don’t.This is a good move for Meta. The fact that they thought anyone would want a watch from them is the question. I would never buy a hardware product from a company known for tracking users every way they can.
In any normal company, Zuck would be booted out, and Facebook would have a 'Satya Nadella' moment. Facebook is wildly successful but they definitely need a new chief to take them to the next level, just as Microsoft did.
Cue the shareholder rights lawyers and fasten your seatbelts. This could get bumpy.Impossible for shareholders to oust him, Zuckerberg has 54.4% of Class B stock which has 10x the voting power of a regular share. The house always wins... unless it burns down.