Whatever Meta aspires to be, right now the Quest is a gaming console. And the Vision Pro is a device for running iPad apps.Meta and Apple have a different goal in mind for their products:
Meta: Metaverse as a social universe. Their source of revenue is not based on selling devices but services that can help them with their data mining. That’s why they are angry at Apple for pushing hard towards user privacy.
Apple: AR/VR device as a productivity tool with app consumption and as an entertainment device. Social interactions needed for data mining are not in their plans, except for regular communications that don’t compromise user privacy. In plain words, Apple is not pushing for a “metaverse-like” environment.
That’s why comparing both products don’t make much sense. Each has its main purpose.
That’s why we never heard of surgeons using Quests to operate on patients, or engineers designing high precision machinery using a Quest.
Two products aimed at different markets.
The more things change the more they stay the same?Then dystopia happens a long time ago.
View attachment 2370974
At some point when the tech is cheap enough Nintendo will make a ViiR with Z3lDa and Super mARio, after suing Meta because their avatars look like Miis.Now we're in a three-way race for standalone VR/AR: Meta, Apple, and (at some point, probably this year) Samsung/Google.
What stops your big genius to make a life like app meeting and publish on the Meta Store?A mediocre operative system that is focused on the wrong thing (gaming and VR controllers) while trying to push cartoonish avatars into business meetings. I don't know Mark...
Yes, just like All of Apple's OSes (IOS, MacOS, ...) are "just a layer over BSD UNIX."Isn't this just a layer on top of Android?
Kind of like saying macOS is just a layer on top of BSD.Isn't this just a layer on top of Android?
Facebook parent company Meta today announced the upcoming expansion of Meta Horizon OS, a virtual and augmented reality operating system that will be available to third-party hardware manufacturers that want to design their own headsets.
I guess he can dream.Zuckerberg has been clear that he wants his company to be a more open platform than Apple’s. Here, he’s firmly positioning Meta’s Horizon OS as the Android alternative to Apple’s Vision Pro. Given how Android was more of a reaction to the iPhone, an analogy he’d probably prefer is how Microsoft built the early PC market by licensing Windows.
While Apple will close all the doors to others but use the front door to gather all the user data and deny it to others in the name of privacy.Meta will have back door to all those devices
Whatever Meta aspires to be, right now the Quest is a gaming console. And the Vision Pro is a device for running iPad apps.
Surgeons and engineers are better off with a headset connected to a PC.
... and Microsoft is very late in the game. Windows Mobile (Pocket PC) lost to Android because Microsoft couldn't get its act together in mobile. Now Microsoft is late in VR/AR.We have IOS and android, Mac and Windows: if VR/AR is the future like these companies want us to believe, a platform war between Apple’s traditional walled garden approach and a more ‘open’/licensable alternative makes sense.
Just like visionOS is a layer on top of iOS/iPadOS... and macOS is a layer on Darwin....Isn't this just a layer on top of Android?
Yes, I was being a bit reductive and glib. When I say iPad apps, I mean more that they are iPad-class apps. For the most part they have the same limitations as iPad apps, and it looks like very few of them take advantage of the unique abilities afforded by VR.The AVP does more than just let you run iPad apps. The majority of the apps I use frequently are native apps but even for apps that are iPad compatible being able to open multiple apps and position them where ever I want to in the 3D space around me, including in another room, is super cool and lets me be more productive than I can be on just an iPad by itself.
Being able to control an advanced user interface just by looking at it and pressing your finger and thumb together is like nothing else I’ve ever used. I rarely ever use my iPad since I brought home the AVP so yes, it does let you run iPad apps, but you can run them in a way you simply can’t on the iPad itself, the number of native apps is growing and that will only improve when they finally start selling it in markets outside the USA and when it comes to media consumption there’s absolutely nothing like it that I’ve seen outside of seeing a movie in IMAX with the upside of being able to do it from my couch without anyone else in an actual IMAX theater being obnoxious.
For professional use cases where the 3D aspect is important, such as architectural or automotive visualization, a VR headset connected to a high-powered GPU will almost always be a better option.
A mediocre operative system that is focused on the wrong thing (gaming and VR controllers) while trying to push cartoonish avatars into business meetings. I don't know Mark...